| Message ID | 20210416155535.1694714-3-idosch@idosch.org |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | nexthop: Support large scale nexthop flushing | expand |
On 4/16/21 8:55 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote: > From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> > > Test that all the nexthops are flushed when a multi-part nexthop dump is > required for the flushing. > > Without previous patch: > > # ./fib_nexthops.sh > TEST: Large scale nexthop flushing [FAIL] > > With previous patch: > > # ./fib_nexthops.sh > TEST: Large scale nexthop flushing [ OK ] > > Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> > Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com> > --- > tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_nexthops.sh | 15 +++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) > Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_nexthops.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_nexthops.sh index 56dd0c6f2e96..49774a8a7736 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_nexthops.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_nexthops.sh @@ -1933,6 +1933,21 @@ basic() log_test $? 2 "Nexthop group and blackhole" $IP nexthop flush >/dev/null 2>&1 + + # Test to ensure that flushing with a multi-part nexthop dump works as + # expected. + local batch_file=$(mktemp) + + for i in $(seq 1 $((64 * 1024))); do + echo "nexthop add id $i blackhole" >> $batch_file + done + + $IP -b $batch_file + $IP nexthop flush >/dev/null 2>&1 + [[ $($IP nexthop | wc -l) -eq 0 ]] + log_test $? 0 "Large scale nexthop flushing" + + rm $batch_file } check_nexthop_buckets_balance()