@@ -316,11 +316,6 @@ static int cpufreq_thermal_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
&cpufreq_dev->allowed_cpus))
continue;
- if (!cpufreq_dev->cpufreq_val)
- cpufreq_dev->cpufreq_val = get_cpu_frequency(
- cpumask_any(&cpufreq_dev->allowed_cpus),
- cpufreq_dev->cpufreq_state);
-
max_freq = cpufreq_dev->cpufreq_val;
if (policy->max != max_freq)
@@ -444,6 +439,13 @@ __cpufreq_cooling_register(struct device_node *np,
if (!cpufreq_dev)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+ cpufreq_dev->cpufreq_val = get_cpu_frequency(cpumask_any(clip_cpus), 0);
+ if (!cpufreq_dev->cpufreq_val) {
+ pr_err("%s: Failed to get frequency", __func__);
+ cool_dev = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+ goto free_cdev;
+ }
+
cpumask_copy(&cpufreq_dev->allowed_cpus, clip_cpus);
ret = get_idr(&cpufreq_idr, &cpufreq_dev->id);
There is no point checking for validity of 'cpufreq_val' from cpufreq_thermal_notifier() every time the routine is called. Its guaranteed to be 0 on the first call but will be valid otherwise. Lets update it once while the device registers. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> --- drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c | 12 +++++++----- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)