diff mbox series

[5.10,156/221] net: check all name nodes in __dev_alloc_name

Message ID 20210329075634.365237903@linuxfoundation.org
State New
Headers show
Series None | expand

Commit Message

Greg Kroah-Hartman March 29, 2021, 7:58 a.m. UTC 
From: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>

[ Upstream commit 6c015a2256801597fadcbc11d287774c9c512fa5 ]

__dev_alloc_name(), when supplied with a name containing '%d',
will search for the first available device number to generate a
unique device name.

Since commit ff92741270bf8b6e78aa885f166b68c7a67ab13a ("net:
introduce name_node struct to be used in hashlist") network
devices may have alternate names.  __dev_alloc_name() does take
these alternate names into account, possibly generating a name
that is already taken and failing with -ENFILE as a result.

This demonstrates the bug:

    # rmmod dummy 2>/dev/null
    # ip link property add dev lo altname dummy0
    # modprobe dummy numdummies=1
    modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'dummy': Too many open files in system

Instead of creating a device named dummy1, modprobe fails.

Fix this by checking all the names in the d->name_node list, not just d->name.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>
Fixes: ff92741270bf ("net: introduce name_node struct to be used in hashlist")
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 net/core/dev.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 75ca6c6d01d6..dbc286fd2047 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -1195,6 +1195,18 @@  static int __dev_alloc_name(struct net *net, const char *name, char *buf)
 			return -ENOMEM;
 
 		for_each_netdev(net, d) {
+			struct netdev_name_node *name_node;
+			list_for_each_entry(name_node, &d->name_node->list, list) {
+				if (!sscanf(name_node->name, name, &i))
+					continue;
+				if (i < 0 || i >= max_netdevices)
+					continue;
+
+				/*  avoid cases where sscanf is not exact inverse of printf */
+				snprintf(buf, IFNAMSIZ, name, i);
+				if (!strncmp(buf, name_node->name, IFNAMSIZ))
+					set_bit(i, inuse);
+			}
 			if (!sscanf(d->name, name, &i))
 				continue;
 			if (i < 0 || i >= max_netdevices)