@@ -84,11 +84,25 @@ int __weak arch_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type)
return 0;
}
+static struct irq_domain *pci_msi_get_domain(struct pci_dev *dev)
+{
+ struct irq_domain *domain = NULL;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
+ if (dev->bus->msi)
+ domain = dev->bus->msi->domain;
+#endif
+ if (!domain)
+ domain = arch_get_pci_msi_domain(dev);
+
+ return domain;
+}
+
static int pci_msi_setup_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec, int type)
{
struct irq_domain *domain;
- domain = arch_get_pci_msi_domain(dev);
+ domain = pci_msi_get_domain(dev);
if (domain)
return pci_msi_domain_alloc_irqs(domain, type, dev);
@@ -89,6 +89,9 @@ struct msi_chip {
struct device *dev;
struct device_node *of_node;
struct list_head list;
+#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
+ struct irq_domain *domain;
+#endif
int (*setup_irq)(struct msi_chip *chip, struct pci_dev *dev,
struct msi_desc *desc);
With the new stacked irq domains, it becomes pretty tempting to allocate an MSI domain per PCI bus, which would remove the requirement of either relying on arch-specific code, or a default PCI MSI domain. By allowing the msi_chip structure to carry a pointer to an irq_domain, we can easily use this in pci_msi_setup_msi_irqs. The existing code can still be used as a fallback if the MSI driver does not populate the domain field. Tested on arm64 with the GICv3 ITS driver. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> --- drivers/pci/msi.c | 16 +++++++++++++++- include/linux/msi.h | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)