diff mbox series

arm64: dts: ls1028a: fix optee node

Message ID 20210318083438.26536-1-michael@walle.cc
State New
Headers show
Series arm64: dts: ls1028a: fix optee node | expand

Commit Message

Michael Walle March 18, 2021, 8:34 a.m. UTC
Don't enable the optee node in the SoC include. It is an optional
component and actually, if enabled, breaks boards which doesn't have it.

This reverts commit 48787485f8de ("arm64: dts: ls1028a: enable optee
node") and enables the node per board, assuming the intend of the
original author was to enable OPTEE for the LS1028A-RDB and the
LS1028A-QDS.

Fixes: 48787485f8de ("arm64: dts: ls1028a: enable optee node")
Reported-by: Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@collabora.com>
Reported-by: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@kernelci.org>
Tested-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-qds.dts | 4 ++++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts | 4 ++++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi    | 3 ++-
 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Leo Li March 22, 2021, 11:12 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 3:36 AM Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc> wrote:
>

> Don't enable the optee node in the SoC include. It is an optional

> component and actually, if enabled, breaks boards which doesn't have it.


Hi Shawn,

Shall we make this a general rule?  I see quite a few SoC dtsi files
are having the optee node enabled by default.

Regards,
Leo

>

> This reverts commit 48787485f8de ("arm64: dts: ls1028a: enable optee

> node") and enables the node per board, assuming the intend of the

> original author was to enable OPTEE for the LS1028A-RDB and the

> LS1028A-QDS.

>

> Fixes: 48787485f8de ("arm64: dts: ls1028a: enable optee node")

> Reported-by: Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@collabora.com>

> Reported-by: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@kernelci.org>

> Tested-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>

> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>

> ---

>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-qds.dts | 4 ++++

>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts | 4 ++++

>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi    | 3 ++-

>  3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

>

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-qds.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-qds.dts

> index fbcba9cb8503..060d3c79244d 100644

> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-qds.dts

> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-qds.dts

> @@ -327,6 +327,10 @@

>         status = "okay";

>  };

>

> +&optee {

> +       status = "okay";

> +};

> +

>  &sai1 {

>         status = "okay";

>  };

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts

> index 41ae6e7675ba..1bdf0104d492 100644

> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts

> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts

> @@ -274,6 +274,10 @@

>         status = "okay";

>  };

>

> +&optee {

> +       status = "okay";

> +};

> +

>  &sai4 {

>         status = "okay";

>  };

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi

> index 50d277eb2a54..e2007ebacd69 100644

> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi

> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi

> @@ -92,9 +92,10 @@

>         };

>

>         firmware {

> -               optee {

> +               optee: optee {

>                         compatible = "linaro,optee-tz";

>                         method = "smc";

> +                       status = "disabled";

>                 };

>         };

>

> --

> 2.20.1

>
Shawn Guo March 29, 2021, 12:38 a.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 06:12:06PM -0500, Li Yang wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 3:36 AM Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc> wrote:

> >

> > Don't enable the optee node in the SoC include. It is an optional

> > component and actually, if enabled, breaks boards which doesn't have it.

> 

> Hi Shawn,

> 

> Shall we make this a general rule?  I see quite a few SoC dtsi files

> are having the optee node enabled by default.



Yeah, we should probably make it a general rule considering the issue
reported here.  I thought that optee driver is smart enough to stop
probing if there is no optee os/firmware support found on given platform.

Shawn
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-qds.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-qds.dts
index fbcba9cb8503..060d3c79244d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-qds.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-qds.dts
@@ -327,6 +327,10 @@ 
 	status = "okay";
 };
 
+&optee {
+	status = "okay";
+};
+
 &sai1 {
 	status = "okay";
 };
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts
index 41ae6e7675ba..1bdf0104d492 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts
@@ -274,6 +274,10 @@ 
 	status = "okay";
 };
 
+&optee {
+	status = "okay";
+};
+
 &sai4 {
 	status = "okay";
 };
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
index 50d277eb2a54..e2007ebacd69 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
@@ -92,9 +92,10 @@ 
 	};
 
 	firmware {
-		optee {
+		optee: optee {
 			compatible = "linaro,optee-tz";
 			method = "smc";
+			status = "disabled";
 		};
 	};