diff mbox

[SMS] Minor misc. fixes

Message ID CAHz1=dU=ksEEuxsH_r4EWaWg9A9U6FehOQzbRCTB7viuX6VdLw@mail.gmail.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Revital Eres Sept. 12, 2011, 11:41 a.m. UTC 
Hello,

> OK.
> While we're at it, an alternative would be to have
> remove_node_from_ps() assert its own (parameters and) return value.
> That is, replace "if (c) return false" by "assert (!c)" and have it
> return void if successful. There's not much you can do if it returns
> false. That would check its other invocation too.

OK, that's indeed seems reasonable.
The attached patch implements it.
Will commit it after re-testing completes if there is not objection.

Thanks,
Revital

Changelog:

       modulo-sched.c (remove_node_from_ps): Return void instead of bool.
        (optimize_sc): Adjust call to remove_node_from_ps.
        (sms_schedule): Add print info.
diff mbox

Patch

Index: modulo-sched.c
===================================================================
--- modulo-sched.c	(revision 178755)
+++ modulo-sched.c	(working copy)
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@  static int get_sched_window (partial_sch
 static bool try_scheduling_node_in_cycle (partial_schedule_ptr, ddg_node_ptr,
 					  int, int, sbitmap, int *, sbitmap,
 					  sbitmap);
-static bool remove_node_from_ps (partial_schedule_ptr, ps_insn_ptr);
+static void remove_node_from_ps (partial_schedule_ptr, ps_insn_ptr);
 
 #define SCHED_ASAP(x) (((node_sched_params_ptr)(x)->aux.info)->asap)
 #define SCHED_TIME(x) (((node_sched_params_ptr)(x)->aux.info)->time)
@@ -834,8 +834,7 @@  optimize_sc (partial_schedule_ptr ps, dd
 	if (next_ps_i->node->cuid == g->closing_branch->cuid)
 	  break;
 
-      gcc_assert (next_ps_i);
-      gcc_assert (remove_node_from_ps (ps, next_ps_i));
+      remove_node_from_ps (ps, next_ps_i);
       success =
 	try_scheduling_node_in_cycle (ps, g->closing_branch,
 				      g->closing_branch->cuid, c,
@@ -1485,8 +1484,8 @@  sms_schedule (void)
           if (dump_file)
             {
 	      fprintf (dump_file,
-		       "SMS succeeded %d %d (with ii, sc)\n", ps->ii,
-		       stage_count);
+		       "%s:%d SMS succeeded %d %d (with ii, sc)\n",
+		       insn_file (tail), insn_line (tail), ps->ii, stage_count);
 	      print_partial_schedule (ps, dump_file);
 	    }
  
@@ -2719,22 +2718,18 @@  create_ps_insn (ddg_node_ptr node, int c
 }
 
 
-/* Removes the given PS_INSN from the partial schedule.  Returns false if the
-   node is not found in the partial schedule, else returns true.  */
-static bool
+/* Removes the given PS_INSN from the partial schedule.  */  
+static void 
 remove_node_from_ps (partial_schedule_ptr ps, ps_insn_ptr ps_i)
 {
   int row;
 
-  if (!ps || !ps_i)
-    return false;
-
+  gcc_assert (ps && ps_i);
+  
   row = SMODULO (ps_i->cycle, ps->ii);
   if (! ps_i->prev_in_row)
     {
-      if (ps_i != ps->rows[row])
-	return false;
-
+      gcc_assert (ps_i == ps->rows[row]);
       ps->rows[row] = ps_i->next_in_row;
       if (ps->rows[row])
 	ps->rows[row]->prev_in_row = NULL;
@@ -2748,7 +2743,7 @@  remove_node_from_ps (partial_schedule_pt
    
   ps->rows_length[row] -= 1; 
   free (ps_i);
-  return true;
+  return;
 }
 
 /* Unlike what literature describes for modulo scheduling (which focuses