diff mbox

[testsuite] avoid test when compile options is conflict with default mthumb

Message ID CADf_BoVJUXR9Lkx1iZwqNrboj8M6FCO74xOFixrTZGG67Ys5ZQ@mail.gmail.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Wang Deqiang Oct. 31, 2014, 1:38 a.m. UTC
This is a ping for

https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg01049.html


---------- Original message ----------
From: Wang Deqiang <wang.deqiang@linaro.org>
Date: 11 October 2014 11:27
Subject: [testsuite patch] avoid test when compile options is conflict
with default mthumb
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org


When testing arm-linux-gnueabihf triple with configure options
--with-mode=thumb(that makes -mthumb option default).
some testcase is failed with error message "sorry, unimplemented:
Thumb-1 hard-float VFP ABI".
I found gcc compiler show this error message when :
1. -mthumb is used with -march=armv6 (or armv5e) and -mcpu=xscale
2. the test source have function body.

And when -mthumb is the default option of compiler, the dg-skip-if
functions can not detect it,
There is no xscale check function in target-supports.exp in. so we
need to add it .
And there are only macros in the test program in
check_effective_target_arm* function . no function body, we need to
add it too.

Here is my patch:

2014-10-08  Wangdeqiang  <Wangdeqiang@linaro.org>
    * lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_arm_
xscale_ok): New function.
    (check_effective_target_arm_arch_FUNC_ok): Add test function body.
    * gcc.target/arm/pr40887.c (dg-require-effective-target): add
arm_arch_v5te_ok check
    * gcc.target/arm/scd42-1.c (dg-require-effective-target): add
arm_xscale_ok check
    * gcc.target/arm/scd42-2.c : Likewise
    * gcc.target/arm/scd42-3.c : Likewise
    * gcc.target/arm/g2.c : Likewise
    * gcc.target/arm/xor-and.c (dg-require-effective-target): add
arm_arch_v6_ok check
diff mbox

Patch

Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr40887.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr40887.c      (revision 216115)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr40887.c      (working copy)
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ 
 /* { dg-skip-if "need at least armv5" { *-*-* } { "-march=armv[234]*"
} { "" } } */
 /* { dg-options "-O2 -march=armv5te" }  */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "blx" } } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_arch_v5te_ok } */

 int (*indirect_func)(int x);

Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/scd42-2.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/scd42-2.c      (revision 216115)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/scd42-2.c      (working copy)
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ 
 /* { dg-skip-if "Test is specific to the Xscale" { arm*-*-* } {
"-mcpu=*" } { "-mcpu=xscale" } } */
 /* { dg-skip-if "Test is specific to ARM mode" { arm*-*-* } {
"-mthumb" } { "" } } */
 /* { dg-require-effective-target arm32 } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_xscale_ok } */

 unsigned load2(void) __attribute__ ((naked));
 unsigned load2(void)
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/scd42-3.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/scd42-3.c      (revision 216115)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/scd42-3.c      (working copy)
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ 
 /* { dg-skip-if "Test is specific to Xscale" { arm*-*-* } {
"-march=*" } { "-march=xscale" } } */
 /* { dg-skip-if "Test is specific to Xscale" { arm*-*-* } { "-mcpu=*"
} { "-mcpu=xscale" } } */
 /* { dg-options "-mcpu=xscale -O" } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_xscale_ok } */

 unsigned load4(void) __attribute__ ((naked));
 unsigned load4(void)
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/g2.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/g2.c   (revision 216115)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/g2.c   (working copy)
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ 
 /* { dg-skip-if "Test is specific to the Xscale" { arm*-*-* } {
"-mcpu=*" } { "-mcpu=xscale" } } */
 /* { dg-skip-if "Test is specific to ARM mode" { arm*-*-* } {
"-mthumb" } { "" } } */
 /* { dg-require-effective-target arm32 } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_xscale_ok } */

 /* Brett Gaines' test case. */
 unsigned BCPL(unsigned) __attribute__ ((naked));
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/xor-and.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/xor-and.c      (revision 216115)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/xor-and.c      (working copy)
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ 
 /* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O -march=armv6" } */
 /* { dg-prune-output "switch .* conflicts with" } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_arch_v6_ok } */

 unsigned short foo (unsigned short x)
 {
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/scd42-1.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/scd42-1.c      (revision 216115)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/scd42-1.c      (working copy)
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ 
 /* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-skip-if "incompatible options" { arm*-*-* } { "-march=*" } { "" } } */
 /* { dg-options "-mcpu=xscale -O" } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_xscale_ok } */

 unsigned load1(void) __attribute__ ((naked));
 unsigned load1(void)
Index: gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp       (revision 216115)
+++ gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp       (working copy)
@@ -2721,6 +2721,11 @@  foreach { armfunc armflag armdef } { v4
                #if !defined (DEF)
                #error !DEF
                #endif
+               int
+               main (void)
+               {
+                  return 0;
+               }
            } "FLAG" ]
        }

@@ -2948,6 +2953,23 @@  proc check_effective_target_arm_hf_eabi
     }]
 }

+# Return 1 if this is an ARM target supporting -mcpu=xscale.
+# Some multilibs may be incompatible with this option.
+proc check_effective_target_arm_xscale_ok { } {
+    if { [check_effective_target_arm32] } {
+        return [check_no_compiler_messages arm_xscale_ok object {
+           int dummy;
+           int
+           main (void)
+           {
+              return 0;
+           }
+        } "-mcpu=xscale"]
+    } else {
+        return 0
+    }
+}
+
 # Return 1 if this is an ARM target supporting -mcpu=iwmmxt.
 # Some multilibs may be incompatible with this option.