Message ID | 1414160997-30575-1-git-send-email-daniel.thompson@linaro.org |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 5887010040c9ff4c5d41781075f64116f5f1c781 |
Headers | show |
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org> wrote: > irq_set_irq_wake() treats its second argument as a boolean. It is much > easier to read code when constant booleans are either 0 or 1! > > This particular line of code distracted me somewhat when I was doing a bit of > work in a code browser since it (spuriously) got me worried that I had > misunderstood how irq_set_irq_wake() worked. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org> > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> > Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/gpio/gpio-msm-v1.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-msm-v1.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-msm-v1.c > index 73b7396..997e61e 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-msm-v1.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-msm-v1.c > @@ -686,7 +686,7 @@ static int gpio_msm_v1_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > irq_set_chained_handler(irq1, msm_gpio_irq_handler); > irq_set_chained_handler(irq2, msm_gpio_irq_handler); > irq_set_irq_wake(irq1, 1); > - irq_set_irq_wake(irq2, 2); > + irq_set_irq_wake(irq2, 1); > return 0; That could be confusing indeed. Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org> wrote: > irq_set_irq_wake() treats its second argument as a boolean. It is much > easier to read code when constant booleans are either 0 or 1! > > This particular line of code distracted me somewhat when I was doing a bit of > work in a code browser since it (spuriously) got me worried that I had > misunderstood how irq_set_irq_wake() worked. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org> > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> > Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> Patch applied with Alexandre's Review tag. Yours, Linus Walleij
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-msm-v1.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-msm-v1.c index 73b7396..997e61e 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-msm-v1.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-msm-v1.c @@ -686,7 +686,7 @@ static int gpio_msm_v1_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) irq_set_chained_handler(irq1, msm_gpio_irq_handler); irq_set_chained_handler(irq2, msm_gpio_irq_handler); irq_set_irq_wake(irq1, 1); - irq_set_irq_wake(irq2, 2); + irq_set_irq_wake(irq2, 1); return 0; }
irq_set_irq_wake() treats its second argument as a boolean. It is much easier to read code when constant booleans are either 0 or 1! This particular line of code distracted me somewhat when I was doing a bit of work in a code browser since it (spuriously) got me worried that I had misunderstood how irq_set_irq_wake() worked. Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> --- drivers/gpio/gpio-msm-v1.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 1.9.3