Message ID | 20210226153020.867852-1-ciorneiioana@gmail.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [net] net: phy: ti: take into account all possible interrupt sources | expand |
On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:30:20 +0200 Ioana Ciornei wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/dp83822.c b/drivers/net/phy/dp83822.c > index be1224b4447b..f7a2ec150e54 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/phy/dp83822.c > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/dp83822.c > @@ -290,6 +290,7 @@ static int dp83822_config_intr(struct phy_device *phydev) > > static irqreturn_t dp83822_handle_interrupt(struct phy_device *phydev) > { > + bool trigger_machine = false; > int irq_status; > > /* The MISR1 and MISR2 registers are holding the interrupt status in > @@ -305,7 +306,7 @@ static irqreturn_t dp83822_handle_interrupt(struct phy_device *phydev) > return IRQ_NONE; > } > if (irq_status & ((irq_status & GENMASK(7, 0)) << 8)) > - goto trigger_machine; > + trigger_machine = true; > > irq_status = phy_read(phydev, MII_DP83822_MISR2); > if (irq_status < 0) { > @@ -313,11 +314,11 @@ static irqreturn_t dp83822_handle_interrupt(struct phy_device *phydev) > return IRQ_NONE; > } > if (irq_status & ((irq_status & GENMASK(7, 0)) << 8)) > - goto trigger_machine; > + trigger_machine = true; > > - return IRQ_NONE; > + if (!trigger_machine) > + return IRQ_NONE; > > -trigger_machine: > phy_trigger_machine(phydev); > > return IRQ_HANDLED; Would it be better to code it up as: irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE; if (irq_status & ...) ret = IRQ_HANDLED; /* .. */ if (ret != IRQ_NONE) phy_trigger_machine(phydev); return ret; That reads a tiny bit better to me, but it's probably majorly subjective so I'm happy with existing patch if you prefer it.
On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 12:00:27PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:30:20 +0200 Ioana Ciornei wrote: > > diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/dp83822.c b/drivers/net/phy/dp83822.c > > index be1224b4447b..f7a2ec150e54 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/phy/dp83822.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/dp83822.c > > @@ -290,6 +290,7 @@ static int dp83822_config_intr(struct phy_device *phydev) > > > > static irqreturn_t dp83822_handle_interrupt(struct phy_device *phydev) > > { > > + bool trigger_machine = false; > > int irq_status; > > > > /* The MISR1 and MISR2 registers are holding the interrupt status in > > @@ -305,7 +306,7 @@ static irqreturn_t dp83822_handle_interrupt(struct phy_device *phydev) > > return IRQ_NONE; > > } > > if (irq_status & ((irq_status & GENMASK(7, 0)) << 8)) > > - goto trigger_machine; > > + trigger_machine = true; > > > > irq_status = phy_read(phydev, MII_DP83822_MISR2); > > if (irq_status < 0) { > > @@ -313,11 +314,11 @@ static irqreturn_t dp83822_handle_interrupt(struct phy_device *phydev) > > return IRQ_NONE; > > } > > if (irq_status & ((irq_status & GENMASK(7, 0)) << 8)) > > - goto trigger_machine; > > + trigger_machine = true; > > > > - return IRQ_NONE; > > + if (!trigger_machine) > > + return IRQ_NONE; > > > > -trigger_machine: > > phy_trigger_machine(phydev); > > > > return IRQ_HANDLED; > > Would it be better to code it up as: > > irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE; > > if (irq_status & ...) > ret = IRQ_HANDLED; > > /* .. */ > > if (ret != IRQ_NONE) > phy_trigger_machine(phydev); > > return ret; > > That reads a tiny bit better to me, but it's probably majorly > subjective so I'm happy with existing patch if you prefer it. I think I prefer it as it is and this is because it would be in line with all the other PHY drivers which do this: if (!(irq_status & int_enabled)) return IRQ_NONE; phy_trigger_machine(phydev); return IRQ_HANDLED; Ioana
On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 10:21:14 +0200 Ioana Ciornei wrote: > On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 12:00:27PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 17:30:20 +0200 Ioana Ciornei wrote: > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/dp83822.c b/drivers/net/phy/dp83822.c > > > index be1224b4447b..f7a2ec150e54 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/net/phy/dp83822.c > > > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/dp83822.c > > > @@ -290,6 +290,7 @@ static int dp83822_config_intr(struct phy_device *phydev) > > > > > > static irqreturn_t dp83822_handle_interrupt(struct phy_device *phydev) > > > { > > > + bool trigger_machine = false; > > > int irq_status; > > > > > > /* The MISR1 and MISR2 registers are holding the interrupt status in > > > @@ -305,7 +306,7 @@ static irqreturn_t dp83822_handle_interrupt(struct phy_device *phydev) > > > return IRQ_NONE; > > > } > > > if (irq_status & ((irq_status & GENMASK(7, 0)) << 8)) > > > - goto trigger_machine; > > > + trigger_machine = true; > > > > > > irq_status = phy_read(phydev, MII_DP83822_MISR2); > > > if (irq_status < 0) { > > > @@ -313,11 +314,11 @@ static irqreturn_t dp83822_handle_interrupt(struct phy_device *phydev) > > > return IRQ_NONE; > > > } > > > if (irq_status & ((irq_status & GENMASK(7, 0)) << 8)) > > > - goto trigger_machine; > > > + trigger_machine = true; > > > > > > - return IRQ_NONE; > > > + if (!trigger_machine) > > > + return IRQ_NONE; > > > > > > -trigger_machine: > > > phy_trigger_machine(phydev); > > > > > > return IRQ_HANDLED; > > > > Would it be better to code it up as: > > > > irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE; > > > > if (irq_status & ...) > > ret = IRQ_HANDLED; > > > > /* .. */ > > > > if (ret != IRQ_NONE) > > phy_trigger_machine(phydev); > > > > return ret; > > > > That reads a tiny bit better to me, but it's probably majorly > > subjective so I'm happy with existing patch if you prefer it. > > I think I prefer it as it is and this is because it would be in line > with all the other PHY drivers which do this: > > if (!(irq_status & int_enabled)) > return IRQ_NONE; > > phy_trigger_machine(phydev); > Okay, applied, thanks!
diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/dp83822.c b/drivers/net/phy/dp83822.c index be1224b4447b..f7a2ec150e54 100644 --- a/drivers/net/phy/dp83822.c +++ b/drivers/net/phy/dp83822.c @@ -290,6 +290,7 @@ static int dp83822_config_intr(struct phy_device *phydev) static irqreturn_t dp83822_handle_interrupt(struct phy_device *phydev) { + bool trigger_machine = false; int irq_status; /* The MISR1 and MISR2 registers are holding the interrupt status in @@ -305,7 +306,7 @@ static irqreturn_t dp83822_handle_interrupt(struct phy_device *phydev) return IRQ_NONE; } if (irq_status & ((irq_status & GENMASK(7, 0)) << 8)) - goto trigger_machine; + trigger_machine = true; irq_status = phy_read(phydev, MII_DP83822_MISR2); if (irq_status < 0) { @@ -313,11 +314,11 @@ static irqreturn_t dp83822_handle_interrupt(struct phy_device *phydev) return IRQ_NONE; } if (irq_status & ((irq_status & GENMASK(7, 0)) << 8)) - goto trigger_machine; + trigger_machine = true; - return IRQ_NONE; + if (!trigger_machine) + return IRQ_NONE; -trigger_machine: phy_trigger_machine(phydev); return IRQ_HANDLED; diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/dp83tc811.c b/drivers/net/phy/dp83tc811.c index 688fadffb249..7ea32fb77190 100644 --- a/drivers/net/phy/dp83tc811.c +++ b/drivers/net/phy/dp83tc811.c @@ -264,6 +264,7 @@ static int dp83811_config_intr(struct phy_device *phydev) static irqreturn_t dp83811_handle_interrupt(struct phy_device *phydev) { + bool trigger_machine = false; int irq_status; /* The INT_STAT registers 1, 2 and 3 are holding the interrupt status @@ -279,7 +280,7 @@ static irqreturn_t dp83811_handle_interrupt(struct phy_device *phydev) return IRQ_NONE; } if (irq_status & ((irq_status & GENMASK(7, 0)) << 8)) - goto trigger_machine; + trigger_machine = true; irq_status = phy_read(phydev, MII_DP83811_INT_STAT2); if (irq_status < 0) { @@ -287,7 +288,7 @@ static irqreturn_t dp83811_handle_interrupt(struct phy_device *phydev) return IRQ_NONE; } if (irq_status & ((irq_status & GENMASK(7, 0)) << 8)) - goto trigger_machine; + trigger_machine = true; irq_status = phy_read(phydev, MII_DP83811_INT_STAT3); if (irq_status < 0) { @@ -295,11 +296,11 @@ static irqreturn_t dp83811_handle_interrupt(struct phy_device *phydev) return IRQ_NONE; } if (irq_status & ((irq_status & GENMASK(7, 0)) << 8)) - goto trigger_machine; + trigger_machine = true; - return IRQ_NONE; + if (!trigger_machine) + return IRQ_NONE; -trigger_machine: phy_trigger_machine(phydev); return IRQ_HANDLED;