Message ID | 20210222040618.2911498-2-zhengyejian1@huawei.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | Bugfix for ad4740ceccfb ("futex: Avoid violating the 10th rule of futex") | expand |
On 2021/2/22 18:16, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 12:06:18PM +0800, Zheng Yejian wrote: >> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> >> >> commit a97cb0e7b3f4c6297fd857055ae8e895f402f501 upstream. > > Why is this not also needed in 4.9.y? If so, please also provide a > backport there so I can apply this one too. > I've sent a backport for 4.9.y, please review it. Thanks~
diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c index 199e63c5b612..70ad21bbb1d5 100644 --- a/kernel/futex.c +++ b/kernel/futex.c @@ -2248,10 +2248,6 @@ static int __fixup_pi_state_owner(u32 __user *uaddr, struct futex_q *q, oldowner = pi_state->owner; - /* Owner died? */ - if (!pi_state->owner) - newtid |= FUTEX_OWNER_DIED; - /* * We are here because either: * @@ -2309,6 +2305,9 @@ retry: } newtid = task_pid_vnr(newowner) | FUTEX_WAITERS; + /* Owner died? */ + if (!pi_state->owner) + newtid |= FUTEX_OWNER_DIED; if (get_futex_value_locked(&uval, uaddr)) goto handle_fault;