On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 02:37:09PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >From: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com> > >commit a10f373ad3c760dd40b41e2f69a800ee7b8da15e upstream. > >The documentation classifies KVM_ENABLE_CAP with KVM_CAP_ENABLE_CAP_VM >as a vcpu ioctl, which is incorrect. Fix it by specifying it as a VM >ioctl. > >Fixes: e5d83c74a580 ("kvm: make KVM_CAP_ENABLE_CAP_VM architecture agnostic") >Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com> >Message-Id: <20210108165349.747359-1-qperret@google.com> >Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> >Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> > >--- > Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >--- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst >+++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst >@@ -1319,7 +1319,7 @@ documentation when it pops into existenc > > :Capability: KVM_CAP_ENABLE_CAP_VM > :Architectures: all >-:Type: vcpu ioctl >+:Type: vm ioctl > :Parameters: struct kvm_enable_cap (in) > :Returns: 0 on success; -1 on error Um, how did this patch made it in? -- Thanks, Sasha
On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 08:05:06PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote: > On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 02:37:09PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > From: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com> > > > > commit a10f373ad3c760dd40b41e2f69a800ee7b8da15e upstream. > > > > The documentation classifies KVM_ENABLE_CAP with KVM_CAP_ENABLE_CAP_VM > > as a vcpu ioctl, which is incorrect. Fix it by specifying it as a VM > > ioctl. > > > > Fixes: e5d83c74a580 ("kvm: make KVM_CAP_ENABLE_CAP_VM architecture agnostic") > > Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com> > > Message-Id: <20210108165349.747359-1-qperret@google.com> > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> > > > > --- > > Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst > > +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst > > @@ -1319,7 +1319,7 @@ documentation when it pops into existenc > > > > :Capability: KVM_CAP_ENABLE_CAP_VM > > :Architectures: all > > -:Type: vcpu ioctl > > +:Type: vm ioctl > > :Parameters: struct kvm_enable_cap (in) > > :Returns: 0 on success; -1 on error > > Um, how did this patch made it in? It came from my scripts, keeping documentation correct seems to be something it wanted to do :) thanks, greg k-h
--- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst @@ -1319,7 +1319,7 @@ documentation when it pops into existenc :Capability: KVM_CAP_ENABLE_CAP_VM :Architectures: all -:Type: vcpu ioctl +:Type: vm ioctl :Parameters: struct kvm_enable_cap (in) :Returns: 0 on success; -1 on error