| Message ID | 20210125041828.20965-1-qiang.zhang@windriver.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | PM: remove PF_WQ_WORKER mask | expand |
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 5:01 AM <qiang.zhang@windriver.com> wrote: > > From: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@windriver.com> > > Due to kworker also is kernel thread, it's already included > PF_KTHREAD mask, so remove PF_WQ_WORKER mask. So you are saying that all threads having PF_WQ_WORKER set must also have PF_KTHREAD set, right? That sounds correct, so I'm going to rewrite the changelog and apply the patch as 5.12 material, thanks! > Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@windriver.com> > --- > kernel/power/process.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/power/process.c b/kernel/power/process.c > index 45b054b7b5ec..50cc63534486 100644 > --- a/kernel/power/process.c > +++ b/kernel/power/process.c > @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ void thaw_kernel_threads(void) > > read_lock(&tasklist_lock); > for_each_process_thread(g, p) { > - if (p->flags & (PF_KTHREAD | PF_WQ_WORKER)) > + if (p->flags & PF_KTHREAD) > __thaw_task(p); > } > read_unlock(&tasklist_lock); > -- > 2.17.1 >
diff --git a/kernel/power/process.c b/kernel/power/process.c index 45b054b7b5ec..50cc63534486 100644 --- a/kernel/power/process.c +++ b/kernel/power/process.c @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ void thaw_kernel_threads(void) read_lock(&tasklist_lock); for_each_process_thread(g, p) { - if (p->flags & (PF_KTHREAD | PF_WQ_WORKER)) + if (p->flags & PF_KTHREAD) __thaw_task(p); } read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);