@@ -735,9 +735,10 @@ static long hugetlbfs_fallocate(struct f
mutex_unlock(&hugetlb_fault_mutex_table[hash]);
+ set_page_huge_active(page);
/*
* unlock_page because locked by add_to_page_cache()
- * page_put due to reference from alloc_huge_page()
+ * put_page() due to reference from alloc_huge_page()
*/
unlock_page(page);
put_page(page);
@@ -770,6 +770,8 @@ static inline void huge_ptep_modify_prot
}
#endif
+void set_page_huge_active(struct page *page);
+
#else /* CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE */
struct hstate {};
@@ -1349,7 +1349,7 @@ bool page_huge_active(struct page *page)
}
/* never called for tail page */
-static void set_page_huge_active(struct page *page)
+void set_page_huge_active(struct page *page)
{
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageHeadHuge(page), page);
SetPagePrivate(&page[1]);
The patch titled Subject: mm: hugetlbfs: fix cannot migrate the fallocated HugeTLB page has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is mm-hugetlbfs-fix-cannot-migrate-the-fallocated-hugetlb-page.patch This patch should soon appear at https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-hugetlbfs-fix-cannot-migrate-the-fallocated-hugetlb-page.patch and later at https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mm-hugetlbfs-fix-cannot-migrate-the-fallocated-hugetlb-page.patch Before you just go and hit "reply", please: a) Consider who else should be cc'ed b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's *** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code *** The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated there every 3-4 working days ------------------------------------------------------ From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Subject: mm: hugetlbfs: fix cannot migrate the fallocated HugeTLB page If a new hugetlb page is allocated during fallocate it will not be marked as active (set_page_huge_active) which will result in a later isolate_huge_page failure when the page migration code would like to move that page. Such a failure would be unexpected and wrong. Only export set_page_huge_active, just leave clear_page_huge_active as static. Because there are no external users. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210115124942.46403-3-songmuchun@bytedance.com Fixes: 70c3547e36f5 (hugetlbfs: add hugetlbfs_fallocate()) Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> --- fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c | 3 ++- include/linux/hugetlb.h | 2 ++ mm/hugetlb.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)