Message ID | 1409583475-6978-12-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 22:57:49 +0800, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> wrote: > Introduce ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_GIC which is needed for ARM64 as GIC is > used, and then register device's gsi with the core IRQ subsystem. > > acpi_register_gsi() is similar to DT based irq_of_parse_and_map(), > since gsi is unique in the system, so use hwirq number directly > for the mapping. > > Originally-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> > --- > arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/acpi/bus.c | 3 ++ > include/linux/acpi.h | 1 + > 3 files changed, 77 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c > index 35dff11..354b912 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c > @@ -37,6 +37,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_pci_disabled); > static int enabled_cpus; /* Processors (GICC) with enabled flag in MADT */ > > /* > + * Since we're on ARM, the default interrupt routing model > + * clearly has to be GIC. > + */ > +enum acpi_irq_model_id acpi_irq_model = ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_GIC; > + > +/* > * __acpi_map_table() will be called before page_init(), so early_ioremap() > * or early_memremap() should be called here to for ACPI table mapping. > */ > @@ -194,6 +200,73 @@ void __init acpi_smp_init_cpus(void) > pr_info("%d CPUs enabled, %d CPUs total\n", enabled_cpus, total_cpus); > } > > +int acpi_gsi_to_irq(u32 gsi, unsigned int *irq) > +{ > + *irq = irq_find_mapping(NULL, gsi); > + > + return 0; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_gsi_to_irq); Why is this exported? x86 exports it, but ia64 does not. There aren't very many callers, and none of them can be built as a module AFAICS. > + > +/* > + * success: return IRQ number (>0) > + * failure: return =< 0 > + */ > +int acpi_register_gsi(struct device *dev, u32 gsi, int trigger, int polarity) > +{ > + unsigned int irq; > + unsigned int irq_type; > + > + /* > + * ACPI have no bindings to indicate SPI or PPI, so we > + * use different mappings from DT in ACPI. > + * > + * For FDT > + * PPI interrupt: in the range [0, 15]; > + * SPI interrupt: in the range [0, 987]; > + * > + * For ACPI, GSI should be unique so using > + * the hwirq directly for the mapping: > + * PPI interrupt: in the range [16, 31]; > + * SPI interrupt: in the range [32, 1019]; > + */ Hmmm, so doing it this way means that DT systems will have a different irq_domain setup compared with ACPI systems. I'm not convinced we want to do that, but I need to look at the code that sets up the new domains before I comment further... g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> wrote: > On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 22:57:49 +0800, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> wrote: >> Introduce ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_GIC which is needed for ARM64 as GIC is >> used, and then register device's gsi with the core IRQ subsystem. >> >> acpi_register_gsi() is similar to DT based irq_of_parse_and_map(), >> since gsi is unique in the system, so use hwirq number directly >> for the mapping. >> >> Originally-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com> >> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> >> --- >> arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> drivers/acpi/bus.c | 3 ++ >> include/linux/acpi.h | 1 + >> 3 files changed, 77 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c >> index 35dff11..354b912 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c >> @@ -37,6 +37,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_pci_disabled); >> static int enabled_cpus; /* Processors (GICC) with enabled flag in MADT */ >> >> /* >> + * Since we're on ARM, the default interrupt routing model >> + * clearly has to be GIC. >> + */ >> +enum acpi_irq_model_id acpi_irq_model = ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_GIC; >> + >> +/* >> * __acpi_map_table() will be called before page_init(), so early_ioremap() >> * or early_memremap() should be called here to for ACPI table mapping. >> */ >> @@ -194,6 +200,73 @@ void __init acpi_smp_init_cpus(void) >> pr_info("%d CPUs enabled, %d CPUs total\n", enabled_cpus, total_cpus); >> } >> >> +int acpi_gsi_to_irq(u32 gsi, unsigned int *irq) >> +{ >> + *irq = irq_find_mapping(NULL, gsi); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_gsi_to_irq); > > Why is this exported? x86 exports it, but ia64 does not. There aren't > very many callers, and none of them can be built as a module AFAICS. > >> + >> +/* >> + * success: return IRQ number (>0) >> + * failure: return =< 0 >> + */ >> +int acpi_register_gsi(struct device *dev, u32 gsi, int trigger, int polarity) >> +{ >> + unsigned int irq; >> + unsigned int irq_type; >> + >> + /* >> + * ACPI have no bindings to indicate SPI or PPI, so we >> + * use different mappings from DT in ACPI. >> + * >> + * For FDT >> + * PPI interrupt: in the range [0, 15]; >> + * SPI interrupt: in the range [0, 987]; >> + * >> + * For ACPI, GSI should be unique so using >> + * the hwirq directly for the mapping: >> + * PPI interrupt: in the range [16, 31]; >> + * SPI interrupt: in the range [32, 1019]; >> + */ > > Hmmm, so doing it this way means that DT systems will have a different > irq_domain setup compared with ACPI systems. I'm not convinced we want > to do that, but I need to look at the code that sets up the new domains > before I comment further... Okay, nevermind. I looked at the setup code. This isn't an issue of the irq domain being set up differently, but rather the binding translation operates differently between DT and ACPI. ACPI used a single integer encapsulating PPI and SPI which just happens to line up with the hwirq numbers, whereas DT uses a [type,number] tuple that needs translating into the hwirq. This code is fine. g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On 2014年09月11日 19:08, Grant Likely wrote: > On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 22:57:49 +0800, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> wrote: >> Introduce ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_GIC which is needed for ARM64 as GIC is >> used, and then register device's gsi with the core IRQ subsystem. >> >> acpi_register_gsi() is similar to DT based irq_of_parse_and_map(), >> since gsi is unique in the system, so use hwirq number directly >> for the mapping. >> >> Originally-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com> >> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> >> --- >> arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> drivers/acpi/bus.c | 3 ++ >> include/linux/acpi.h | 1 + >> 3 files changed, 77 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c >> index 35dff11..354b912 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c >> @@ -37,6 +37,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_pci_disabled); >> static int enabled_cpus; /* Processors (GICC) with enabled flag in MADT */ >> >> /* >> + * Since we're on ARM, the default interrupt routing model >> + * clearly has to be GIC. >> + */ >> +enum acpi_irq_model_id acpi_irq_model = ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_GIC; >> + >> +/* >> * __acpi_map_table() will be called before page_init(), so early_ioremap() >> * or early_memremap() should be called here to for ACPI table mapping. >> */ >> @@ -194,6 +200,73 @@ void __init acpi_smp_init_cpus(void) >> pr_info("%d CPUs enabled, %d CPUs total\n", enabled_cpus, total_cpus); >> } >> >> +int acpi_gsi_to_irq(u32 gsi, unsigned int *irq) >> +{ >> + *irq = irq_find_mapping(NULL, gsi); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_gsi_to_irq); > Why is this exported? x86 exports it, but ia64 does not. There aren't > very many callers, and none of them can be built as a module AFAICS. It will be called by Generic Hardware Error Source driver which can be built as module, and it provides a way to report platform hardware errors (such as that from chipset) which can also used by ARM platform, so I think we can keep it as exported. Thanks Hanjun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c index 35dff11..354b912 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c @@ -37,6 +37,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_pci_disabled); static int enabled_cpus; /* Processors (GICC) with enabled flag in MADT */ /* + * Since we're on ARM, the default interrupt routing model + * clearly has to be GIC. + */ +enum acpi_irq_model_id acpi_irq_model = ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_GIC; + +/* * __acpi_map_table() will be called before page_init(), so early_ioremap() * or early_memremap() should be called here to for ACPI table mapping. */ @@ -194,6 +200,73 @@ void __init acpi_smp_init_cpus(void) pr_info("%d CPUs enabled, %d CPUs total\n", enabled_cpus, total_cpus); } +int acpi_gsi_to_irq(u32 gsi, unsigned int *irq) +{ + *irq = irq_find_mapping(NULL, gsi); + + return 0; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_gsi_to_irq); + +/* + * success: return IRQ number (>0) + * failure: return =< 0 + */ +int acpi_register_gsi(struct device *dev, u32 gsi, int trigger, int polarity) +{ + unsigned int irq; + unsigned int irq_type; + + /* + * ACPI have no bindings to indicate SPI or PPI, so we + * use different mappings from DT in ACPI. + * + * For FDT + * PPI interrupt: in the range [0, 15]; + * SPI interrupt: in the range [0, 987]; + * + * For ACPI, GSI should be unique so using + * the hwirq directly for the mapping: + * PPI interrupt: in the range [16, 31]; + * SPI interrupt: in the range [32, 1019]; + */ + + if (trigger == ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE && + polarity == ACPI_ACTIVE_LOW) + irq_type = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING; + else if (trigger == ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE && + polarity == ACPI_ACTIVE_HIGH) + irq_type = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING; + else if (trigger == ACPI_LEVEL_SENSITIVE && + polarity == ACPI_ACTIVE_LOW) + irq_type = IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW; + else if (trigger == ACPI_LEVEL_SENSITIVE && + polarity == ACPI_ACTIVE_HIGH) + irq_type = IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH; + else + irq_type = IRQ_TYPE_NONE; + + /* + * Since only one GIC is supported in ACPI 5.0, we can + * create mapping refer to the default domain + */ + irq = irq_create_mapping(NULL, gsi); + if (!irq) + return irq; + + /* Set irq type if specified and different than the current one */ + if (irq_type != IRQ_TYPE_NONE && + irq_type != irq_get_trigger_type(irq)) + irq_set_irq_type(irq, irq_type); + return irq; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_register_gsi); + +void acpi_unregister_gsi(u32 gsi) +{ +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_unregister_gsi); + static int __init acpi_parse_fadt(struct acpi_table_header *table) { struct acpi_table_fadt *fadt = (struct acpi_table_fadt *)table; diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c index 8581f5b..d132c1b 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c @@ -458,6 +458,9 @@ static int __init acpi_bus_init_irq(void) case ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_IOSAPIC: message = "IOSAPIC"; break; + case ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_GIC: + message = "GIC"; + break; case ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_PLATFORM: message = "platform specific model"; break; diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h index 807cbc4..ed1c2d1 100644 --- a/include/linux/acpi.h +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ enum acpi_irq_model_id { ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_IOAPIC, ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_IOSAPIC, ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_PLATFORM, + ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_GIC, ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_COUNT };
Introduce ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_GIC which is needed for ARM64 as GIC is used, and then register device's gsi with the core IRQ subsystem. acpi_register_gsi() is similar to DT based irq_of_parse_and_map(), since gsi is unique in the system, so use hwirq number directly for the mapping. Originally-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> --- arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/acpi/bus.c | 3 ++ include/linux/acpi.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 77 insertions(+)