| Message ID | 20210111154524.20196-4-nicola.mazzucato@arm.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | CPUFreq: Add support for opp-sharing cpus | expand |
On 11-01-21, 15:45, Nicola Mazzucato wrote: > By design, SCMI performance domains define the granularity of > performance controls, they do not describe any underlying hardware > dependencies (although they may match in many cases). > > It is therefore possible to have some platforms where hardware may have > the ability to control CPU performance at different granularity and choose > to describe fine-grained performance control through SCMI. > > In such situations, the energy model would be provided with inaccurate > information based on controls, while it still needs to know the > performance boundaries. > > To restore correct functionality, retrieve information of CPUs under the > same performance domain from operating-points-v2 in DT, and pass it on to > EM. > > Signed-off-by: Nicola Mazzucato <nicola.mazzucato@arm.com> > --- > drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c > index 4aa97cdc5997..ff6ba6fab58b 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c > @@ -226,9 +226,12 @@ static int scmi_init_device(const struct scmi_handle *handle, int cpu) > struct em_data_callback em_cb = EM_DATA_CB(scmi_get_cpu_power); > bool power_scale_mw; > cpumask_var_t scmi_cpus; > + cpumask_var_t opp_shared_cpus; > > if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&scmi_cpus, GFP_KERNEL)) > return -ENOMEM; > + if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&opp_shared_cpus, GFP_KERNEL)) > + return -ENOMEM; > > cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, scmi_cpus); > > @@ -240,6 +243,20 @@ static int scmi_init_device(const struct scmi_handle *handle, int cpu) > goto free_cpumask; > } > > + /* > + * The OPP 'sharing cpus' info may come from dt through an empty opp > + * table and opp-shared. If found, it takes precedence over the SCMI > + * domain IDs info. > + */ > + ret = dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus(cpu_dev, opp_shared_cpus); If this succeeds, you shouldn't even try to call the other get_sharing_cpus variant. > + if (ret || !cpumask_weight(opp_shared_cpus)) { > + /* > + * Either opp-table is not set or no opp-shared was found, > + * use the information from SCMI domain IDs. > + */ > + cpumask_copy(opp_shared_cpus, scmi_cpus); > + } > + > /* > * We get here for each CPU. Add OPPs only on those CPUs for which we > * haven't already done so, or set their OPPs as shared. > @@ -252,7 +269,7 @@ static int scmi_init_device(const struct scmi_handle *handle, int cpu) > goto free_cpumask; > } > > - ret = dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus(cpu_dev, scmi_cpus); > + ret = dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus(cpu_dev, opp_shared_cpus); > if (ret) { > dev_err(cpu_dev, "%s: failed to mark OPPs as shared: %d\n", > __func__, ret); > @@ -269,7 +286,7 @@ static int scmi_init_device(const struct scmi_handle *handle, int cpu) > } > > power_scale_mw = handle->perf_ops->power_scale_mw_get(handle); > - em_dev_register_perf_domain(cpu_dev, nr_opp, &em_cb, scmi_cpus, > + em_dev_register_perf_domain(cpu_dev, nr_opp, &em_cb, opp_shared_cpus, > power_scale_mw); > } > > @@ -284,6 +301,7 @@ static int scmi_init_device(const struct scmi_handle *handle, int cpu) > > free_cpumask: > free_cpumask_var(scmi_cpus); > + free_cpumask_var(opp_shared_cpus); > return ret; > } > > -- > 2.27.0
Hi Viresh, thanks for looking into this. Please see below. On 1/12/21 11:20 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 11-01-21, 15:45, Nicola Mazzucato wrote: >> By design, SCMI performance domains define the granularity of >> performance controls, they do not describe any underlying hardware >> dependencies (although they may match in many cases). >> >> It is therefore possible to have some platforms where hardware may have >> the ability to control CPU performance at different granularity and choose >> to describe fine-grained performance control through SCMI. >> >> In such situations, the energy model would be provided with inaccurate >> information based on controls, while it still needs to know the >> performance boundaries. >> >> To restore correct functionality, retrieve information of CPUs under the >> same performance domain from operating-points-v2 in DT, and pass it on to >> EM. >> >> Signed-off-by: Nicola Mazzucato <nicola.mazzucato@arm.com> >> --- >> drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++-- >> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c >> index 4aa97cdc5997..ff6ba6fab58b 100644 >> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c >> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c >> @@ -226,9 +226,12 @@ static int scmi_init_device(const struct scmi_handle *handle, int cpu) >> struct em_data_callback em_cb = EM_DATA_CB(scmi_get_cpu_power); >> bool power_scale_mw; >> cpumask_var_t scmi_cpus; >> + cpumask_var_t opp_shared_cpus; >> >> if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&scmi_cpus, GFP_KERNEL)) >> return -ENOMEM; >> + if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&opp_shared_cpus, GFP_KERNEL)) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> >> cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, scmi_cpus); >> >> @@ -240,6 +243,20 @@ static int scmi_init_device(const struct scmi_handle *handle, int cpu) >> goto free_cpumask; >> } >> >> + /* >> + * The OPP 'sharing cpus' info may come from dt through an empty opp >> + * table and opp-shared. If found, it takes precedence over the SCMI >> + * domain IDs info. >> + */ >> + ret = dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus(cpu_dev, opp_shared_cpus); > > If this succeeds, you shouldn't even try to call the other > get_sharing_cpus variant. IIUC you mean the above scmi_get_sharing_cpus() ? It is actually required to do so, cause we need the info of SCMI domains, regardless of the clock-sharing lines. When we have opp-sharing cpus we still need to control the SCMI domains as usual. > >> + if (ret || !cpumask_weight(opp_shared_cpus)) { >> + /* >> + * Either opp-table is not set or no opp-shared was found, >> + * use the information from SCMI domain IDs. >> + */ >> + cpumask_copy(opp_shared_cpus, scmi_cpus); >> + } >> + >> /* >> * We get here for each CPU. Add OPPs only on those CPUs for which we >> * haven't already done so, or set their OPPs as shared. >> @@ -252,7 +269,7 @@ static int scmi_init_device(const struct scmi_handle *handle, int cpu) >> goto free_cpumask; >> } >> >> - ret = dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus(cpu_dev, scmi_cpus); >> + ret = dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus(cpu_dev, opp_shared_cpus); >> if (ret) { >> dev_err(cpu_dev, "%s: failed to mark OPPs as shared: %d\n", >> __func__, ret); >> @@ -269,7 +286,7 @@ static int scmi_init_device(const struct scmi_handle *handle, int cpu) >> } >> >> power_scale_mw = handle->perf_ops->power_scale_mw_get(handle); >> - em_dev_register_perf_domain(cpu_dev, nr_opp, &em_cb, scmi_cpus, >> + em_dev_register_perf_domain(cpu_dev, nr_opp, &em_cb, opp_shared_cpus, >> power_scale_mw); >> } >> >> @@ -284,6 +301,7 @@ static int scmi_init_device(const struct scmi_handle *handle, int cpu) >> >> free_cpumask: >> free_cpumask_var(scmi_cpus); >> + free_cpumask_var(opp_shared_cpus); >> return ret; >> } >> >> -- >> 2.27.0 > Many thanks, Nicola
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c index 4aa97cdc5997..ff6ba6fab58b 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c @@ -226,9 +226,12 @@ static int scmi_init_device(const struct scmi_handle *handle, int cpu) struct em_data_callback em_cb = EM_DATA_CB(scmi_get_cpu_power); bool power_scale_mw; cpumask_var_t scmi_cpus; + cpumask_var_t opp_shared_cpus; if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&scmi_cpus, GFP_KERNEL)) return -ENOMEM; + if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&opp_shared_cpus, GFP_KERNEL)) + return -ENOMEM; cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, scmi_cpus); @@ -240,6 +243,20 @@ static int scmi_init_device(const struct scmi_handle *handle, int cpu) goto free_cpumask; } + /* + * The OPP 'sharing cpus' info may come from dt through an empty opp + * table and opp-shared. If found, it takes precedence over the SCMI + * domain IDs info. + */ + ret = dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus(cpu_dev, opp_shared_cpus); + if (ret || !cpumask_weight(opp_shared_cpus)) { + /* + * Either opp-table is not set or no opp-shared was found, + * use the information from SCMI domain IDs. + */ + cpumask_copy(opp_shared_cpus, scmi_cpus); + } + /* * We get here for each CPU. Add OPPs only on those CPUs for which we * haven't already done so, or set their OPPs as shared. @@ -252,7 +269,7 @@ static int scmi_init_device(const struct scmi_handle *handle, int cpu) goto free_cpumask; } - ret = dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus(cpu_dev, scmi_cpus); + ret = dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus(cpu_dev, opp_shared_cpus); if (ret) { dev_err(cpu_dev, "%s: failed to mark OPPs as shared: %d\n", __func__, ret); @@ -269,7 +286,7 @@ static int scmi_init_device(const struct scmi_handle *handle, int cpu) } power_scale_mw = handle->perf_ops->power_scale_mw_get(handle); - em_dev_register_perf_domain(cpu_dev, nr_opp, &em_cb, scmi_cpus, + em_dev_register_perf_domain(cpu_dev, nr_opp, &em_cb, opp_shared_cpus, power_scale_mw); } @@ -284,6 +301,7 @@ static int scmi_init_device(const struct scmi_handle *handle, int cpu) free_cpumask: free_cpumask_var(scmi_cpus); + free_cpumask_var(opp_shared_cpus); return ret; }
By design, SCMI performance domains define the granularity of performance controls, they do not describe any underlying hardware dependencies (although they may match in many cases). It is therefore possible to have some platforms where hardware may have the ability to control CPU performance at different granularity and choose to describe fine-grained performance control through SCMI. In such situations, the energy model would be provided with inaccurate information based on controls, while it still needs to know the performance boundaries. To restore correct functionality, retrieve information of CPUs under the same performance domain from operating-points-v2 in DT, and pass it on to EM. Signed-off-by: Nicola Mazzucato <nicola.mazzucato@arm.com> --- drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)