Message ID | 20210103231235.792999-8-djrscally@gmail.com |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 529b56a854c5a8bd5e6f045cdcbbcd21a1616fbd |
Headers | show |
Series | Add functionality to ipu3-cio2 driver allowing software_node connections to sensors on platforms designed for Windows | expand |
On Sun, Jan 03, 2021 at 11:12:27PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote: > OF, ACPI and software_nodes all implement graphs including nodes for ports > and endpoints. These are all intended to be named with a common schema, > as "port@n" and "endpoint@n" where n is an unsigned int representing the > index of the node. To ensure commonality across the subsystems, provide a > set of macros to define the format. Since v5, can you modify subject prefix to be "device property: "? Same for patches 3 and 4, please.
On 04/01/2021 14:24, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Sun, Jan 03, 2021 at 11:12:27PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote: >> OF, ACPI and software_nodes all implement graphs including nodes for ports >> and endpoints. These are all intended to be named with a common schema, >> as "port@n" and "endpoint@n" where n is an unsigned int representing the >> index of the node. To ensure commonality across the subsystems, provide a >> set of macros to define the format. > Since v5, can you modify subject prefix to be "device property: "? > Same for patches 3 and 4, please. > Will do, and for your last email too.
diff --git a/include/linux/fwnode.h b/include/linux/fwnode.h index 9506f8ec0974..72d36d46287d 100644 --- a/include/linux/fwnode.h +++ b/include/linux/fwnode.h @@ -32,6 +32,13 @@ struct fwnode_endpoint { const struct fwnode_handle *local_fwnode; }; +/* + * ports and endpoints defined as software_nodes should all follow a common + * naming scheme; use these macros to ensure commonality. + */ +#define SWNODE_GRAPH_PORT_NAME_FMT "port@%u" +#define SWNODE_GRAPH_ENDPOINT_NAME_FMT "endpoint@%u" + #define NR_FWNODE_REFERENCE_ARGS 8 /**