diff mbox series

[2/6] iio:pressure:ms5637: introduce hardware differentiation

Message ID 20201209234857.1521453-3-alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com
State New
Headers show
Series iio:pressure:ms5637: add ms5803 support | expand

Commit Message

Alexandre Belloni Dec. 9, 2020, 11:48 p.m. UTC
Some sensors in the ms58xx family have a different PROM length and a
different number of available resolution. introduce struct ms_tp_hw_data to
handle those differences.

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
---
 .../iio/common/ms_sensors/ms_sensors_i2c.h    | 11 ++++++
 drivers/iio/pressure/ms5637.c                 | 35 +++++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Comments

Jonathan Cameron Dec. 13, 2020, 5:12 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 00:48:53 +0100
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> wrote:

> Some sensors in the ms58xx family have a different PROM length and a

> different number of available resolution. introduce struct ms_tp_hw_data to


Introduce

> handle those differences.

> 

> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>

> ---

>  .../iio/common/ms_sensors/ms_sensors_i2c.h    | 11 ++++++

>  drivers/iio/pressure/ms5637.c                 | 35 +++++++++++++++----

>  2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

> 

> diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/ms_sensors/ms_sensors_i2c.h b/drivers/iio/common/ms_sensors/ms_sensors_i2c.h

> index bad09c80e47a..f4a88148c113 100644

> --- a/drivers/iio/common/ms_sensors/ms_sensors_i2c.h

> +++ b/drivers/iio/common/ms_sensors/ms_sensors_i2c.h

> @@ -25,6 +25,16 @@ struct ms_ht_dev {

>  	u8 res_index;

>  };

>  

> +/**

> + * struct ms_hw_data - Temperature/Pressure sensor hardware data

> + * @prom_len:		number of words in the PROM

> + * @max_res_index:	maximum sensor resolution index

> + */

> +struct ms_tp_hw_data {

> +	u8 prom_len;

> +	u8 max_res_index;

> +};

> +

>  /**

>   * struct ms_tp_dev - Temperature/Pressure sensor device structure

>   * @client:	i2c client

> @@ -36,6 +46,7 @@ struct ms_ht_dev {

>  struct ms_tp_dev {

>  	struct i2c_client *client;

>  	struct mutex lock;

> +	const struct ms_tp_hw_data *hw;

>  	u16 prom[MS_SENSORS_TP_PROM_WORDS_NB + 1];

>  	u8 res_index;

>  };

> diff --git a/drivers/iio/pressure/ms5637.c b/drivers/iio/pressure/ms5637.c

> index 7c3f0ccd917c..351bfdb24fb4 100644

> --- a/drivers/iio/pressure/ms5637.c

> +++ b/drivers/iio/pressure/ms5637.c

> @@ -30,6 +30,11 @@

>  

>  #include "../common/ms_sensors/ms_sensors_i2c.h"

>  

> +struct ms_tp_data {

> +	const char *name;

> +	const struct ms_tp_hw_data *hw;

> +};

> +

>  static const int ms5637_samp_freq[6] = { 960, 480, 240, 120, 60, 30 };

>  /* String copy of the above const for readability purpose */

>  static const char ms5637_show_samp_freq[] = "960 480 240 120 60 30";

> @@ -128,6 +133,7 @@ static const struct iio_info ms5637_info = {

>  

>  static int ms5637_probe(struct i2c_client *client)

>  {

> +	const struct ms_tp_data *data = device_get_match_data(&client->dev);


As a follow up to the earlier fun with greybus etc, have to jump through
some hoops to have a fallback here if we have a firmware type that can't
do get_match_data driver/base/sw_node.c is the one greybus is using.

We have drivers that don't do this because frankly I didn't know about it
until a month or two ago.  However, I'm not keen to introduce any
more.

Thanks,

Jonathan

>  	struct ms_tp_dev *dev_data;

>  	struct iio_dev *indio_dev;

>  	int ret;

> @@ -147,11 +153,12 @@ static int ms5637_probe(struct i2c_client *client)

>  

>  	dev_data = iio_priv(indio_dev);

>  	dev_data->client = client;

> -	dev_data->res_index = 5;

> +	dev_data->res_index = data->hw->max_res_index;

> +	dev_data->hw = data->hw;

>  	mutex_init(&dev_data->lock);

>  

>  	indio_dev->info = &ms5637_info;

> -	indio_dev->name = device_get_match_data(&client->dev);

> +	indio_dev->name = data->name;

>  	indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;

>  	indio_dev->channels = ms5637_channels;

>  	indio_dev->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(ms5637_channels);

> @@ -169,11 +176,27 @@ static int ms5637_probe(struct i2c_client *client)

>  	return devm_iio_device_register(&client->dev, indio_dev);

>  }

>  

> +static const struct ms_tp_hw_data ms5637_hw_data  = {

> +	.prom_len = 7,

> +	.max_res_index = 5

> +};

> +

> +static const struct ms_tp_data ms5637_data = { .name = "ms5637", .hw = &ms5637_hw_data };

> +

> +static const struct ms_tp_data ms5805_data = { .name = "ms5805", .hw = &ms5637_hw_data };

> +

> +static const struct ms_tp_data ms5837_data = { .name = "ms5837", .hw = &ms5637_hw_data };

> +

> +static const struct ms_tp_data ms8607_data = {

> +	.name = "ms8607-temppressure",

> +	.hw = &ms5637_hw_data,

> +};

> +

>  static const struct of_device_id ms5637_of_match[] = {

> -	{ .compatible = "meas,ms5637", .data = "ms5637" },

> -	{ .compatible = "meas,ms5805", .data = "ms5805" },

> -	{ .compatible = "meas,ms5837", .data = "ms5837" },

> -	{ .compatible = "meas,ms8607-temppressure", .data = "ms8607-temppressure" },

> +	{ .compatible = "meas,ms5637", .data = &ms5637_data },

> +	{ .compatible = "meas,ms5805", .data = &ms5805_data },

> +	{ .compatible = "meas,ms5837", .data = &ms5837_data },

> +	{ .compatible = "meas,ms8607-temppressure", .data = &ms8607_data },

>  	{ },

>  };

>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ms5637_of_match);
Alexandre Belloni Dec. 13, 2020, 7:51 p.m. UTC | #2
On 13/12/2020 17:12:37+0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> >  static const int ms5637_samp_freq[6] = { 960, 480, 240, 120, 60, 30 };

> >  /* String copy of the above const for readability purpose */

> >  static const char ms5637_show_samp_freq[] = "960 480 240 120 60 30";

> > @@ -128,6 +133,7 @@ static const struct iio_info ms5637_info = {

> >  

> >  static int ms5637_probe(struct i2c_client *client)

> >  {

> > +	const struct ms_tp_data *data = device_get_match_data(&client->dev);

> 

> As a follow up to the earlier fun with greybus etc, have to jump through

> some hoops to have a fallback here if we have a firmware type that can't

> do get_match_data driver/base/sw_node.c is the one greybus is using.

> 

> We have drivers that don't do this because frankly I didn't know about it

> until a month or two ago.  However, I'm not keen to introduce any

> more.

> 


Couldn't greybus be fixed in that regard? Using the i2c_device_id has
been deprecated for a while now.

what we could do is only provide ms5803 support when there is an
of_node. So this doesn't break the ABI and doesn't break greybus and at
the same time doesn't unnecessarily add complexity to the probe for
something that will probably never be used.


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/ms_sensors/ms_sensors_i2c.h b/drivers/iio/common/ms_sensors/ms_sensors_i2c.h
index bad09c80e47a..f4a88148c113 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/common/ms_sensors/ms_sensors_i2c.h
+++ b/drivers/iio/common/ms_sensors/ms_sensors_i2c.h
@@ -25,6 +25,16 @@  struct ms_ht_dev {
 	u8 res_index;
 };
 
+/**
+ * struct ms_hw_data - Temperature/Pressure sensor hardware data
+ * @prom_len:		number of words in the PROM
+ * @max_res_index:	maximum sensor resolution index
+ */
+struct ms_tp_hw_data {
+	u8 prom_len;
+	u8 max_res_index;
+};
+
 /**
  * struct ms_tp_dev - Temperature/Pressure sensor device structure
  * @client:	i2c client
@@ -36,6 +46,7 @@  struct ms_ht_dev {
 struct ms_tp_dev {
 	struct i2c_client *client;
 	struct mutex lock;
+	const struct ms_tp_hw_data *hw;
 	u16 prom[MS_SENSORS_TP_PROM_WORDS_NB + 1];
 	u8 res_index;
 };
diff --git a/drivers/iio/pressure/ms5637.c b/drivers/iio/pressure/ms5637.c
index 7c3f0ccd917c..351bfdb24fb4 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/pressure/ms5637.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/pressure/ms5637.c
@@ -30,6 +30,11 @@ 
 
 #include "../common/ms_sensors/ms_sensors_i2c.h"
 
+struct ms_tp_data {
+	const char *name;
+	const struct ms_tp_hw_data *hw;
+};
+
 static const int ms5637_samp_freq[6] = { 960, 480, 240, 120, 60, 30 };
 /* String copy of the above const for readability purpose */
 static const char ms5637_show_samp_freq[] = "960 480 240 120 60 30";
@@ -128,6 +133,7 @@  static const struct iio_info ms5637_info = {
 
 static int ms5637_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
 {
+	const struct ms_tp_data *data = device_get_match_data(&client->dev);
 	struct ms_tp_dev *dev_data;
 	struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
 	int ret;
@@ -147,11 +153,12 @@  static int ms5637_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
 
 	dev_data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
 	dev_data->client = client;
-	dev_data->res_index = 5;
+	dev_data->res_index = data->hw->max_res_index;
+	dev_data->hw = data->hw;
 	mutex_init(&dev_data->lock);
 
 	indio_dev->info = &ms5637_info;
-	indio_dev->name = device_get_match_data(&client->dev);
+	indio_dev->name = data->name;
 	indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
 	indio_dev->channels = ms5637_channels;
 	indio_dev->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(ms5637_channels);
@@ -169,11 +176,27 @@  static int ms5637_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
 	return devm_iio_device_register(&client->dev, indio_dev);
 }
 
+static const struct ms_tp_hw_data ms5637_hw_data  = {
+	.prom_len = 7,
+	.max_res_index = 5
+};
+
+static const struct ms_tp_data ms5637_data = { .name = "ms5637", .hw = &ms5637_hw_data };
+
+static const struct ms_tp_data ms5805_data = { .name = "ms5805", .hw = &ms5637_hw_data };
+
+static const struct ms_tp_data ms5837_data = { .name = "ms5837", .hw = &ms5637_hw_data };
+
+static const struct ms_tp_data ms8607_data = {
+	.name = "ms8607-temppressure",
+	.hw = &ms5637_hw_data,
+};
+
 static const struct of_device_id ms5637_of_match[] = {
-	{ .compatible = "meas,ms5637", .data = "ms5637" },
-	{ .compatible = "meas,ms5805", .data = "ms5805" },
-	{ .compatible = "meas,ms5837", .data = "ms5837" },
-	{ .compatible = "meas,ms8607-temppressure", .data = "ms8607-temppressure" },
+	{ .compatible = "meas,ms5637", .data = &ms5637_data },
+	{ .compatible = "meas,ms5805", .data = &ms5805_data },
+	{ .compatible = "meas,ms5837", .data = &ms5837_data },
+	{ .compatible = "meas,ms8607-temppressure", .data = &ms8607_data },
 	{ },
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ms5637_of_match);