Message ID | 1405688900-11769-9-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 99195c767be1ddafb805327db11ef63973b43093 |
Headers | show |
Hi Ian, On 18/07/14 14:08, Ian Campbell wrote: > Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> Acked-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org> Regards, > --- > v2: (Try to) Clarify some wording, add examples to help. > --- > docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt b/docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt > index bfb8d01..d967061 100644 > --- a/docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt > +++ b/docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt > @@ -8,15 +8,31 @@ Each node contains the following properties: > > - compatible > > - Must be: > + Must always include at least the generic compatiblity string: > > - "xen,<type>", "xen,multiboot-module" > + "multiboot,module" > > - where <type> must be one of: > + Optionally a more specific compatible string may be used in > + addition to the above. One of: > > - - "linux-zimage" -- the dom0 kernel > - - "linux-initrd" -- the dom0 ramdisk > - - "xsm-policy" -- XSM policy blob > + - "multiboot,kernel" -- the dom0 kernel > + - "multiboot,ramdisk" -- the dom0 ramdisk > + - "xen,xsm-policy" -- XSM policy blob > + > + It is normally recommended to include a more specific > + compatible string (if one applies) in addition to the generic > + string (which must always be present). > + > + Xen 4.4 supported a different set of legacy compatible strings > + which remain supported such that systems supporting both 4.4 > + and later can use a single DTB. > + > + - "xen,multiboot-module" equivalent to "multiboot,module" > + - "xen,linux-zimage" equivalent to "multiboot,kernel" > + - "xen,linux-initrd" equivalent to "multiboot,ramdisk" > + > + For compatibility with Xen 4.4 the more specific "xen,linux-*" > + names are non-optional and must be included. > > - reg > > @@ -29,6 +45,32 @@ Each node contains the following properties: > priority of this field vs. other mechanisms of specifying the > bootargs for the kernel. > > +Examples > +======== > + > +A boot module of unspecified type: > + > + module@0xc0000000 { > + compatible = "multiboot,module"; > + reg = <0xc0000000 0x1234>; > + bootargs = "..."; > + }; > + > +A boot module containing a ramdisk: > + > + module@0xd0000000 { > + compatible = "multiboot,ramdisk", "multiboot,module"; > + reg = <0xd0000000 0x5678>; > + }; > + > +The previous examples are compatible with Xen 4.5+ only. > + > +To be compatible with Xen 4.4 as well use the legacy names: > + > + module@0xd0000000 { > + compatible = "xen,linux-initrd", "xen,multiboot-module"; > + reg = <0xd0000000 0x5678>; > + }; > > Command lines > ============= >
On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 22:03 +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Ian, > > On 18/07/14 14:08, Ian Campbell wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> > > Acked-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org> Thanks. I've applied patches 1..9 of this series. I'll resend 10 ASAP with the change you've suggested. On my potential backports list I've got: xen: arm: implement generic multiboot compatibility strings xen: arm: /chosen/module@N/bootargs bootprotcol node is not deprecated I don't think anything else here is suitable for backport. Let me know if you think something is (or isn't) Thanks, Ian.
On 07/21/2014 12:45 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 22:03 +0100, Julien Grall wrote: >> Hi Ian, >> >> On 18/07/14 14:08, Ian Campbell wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> >> >> Acked-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org> > > Thanks. I've applied patches 1..9 of this series. I'll resend 10 ASAP > with the change you've suggested. > > On my potential backports list I've got: > xen: arm: implement generic multiboot compatibility strings > xen: arm: /chosen/module@N/bootargs bootprotcol node is not deprecated > > I don't think anything else here is suitable for backport. Let me know > if you think something is (or isn't) I would also update the document bindings in docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt. The patch #9 looks the good one for this purpose. Minus the unspecified type example. BTW, I don't find anything in the documentation talking about bootmodule type detection by ordering. Is this intended? Regards,
diff --git a/docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt b/docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt index bfb8d01..d967061 100644 --- a/docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt +++ b/docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt @@ -8,15 +8,31 @@ Each node contains the following properties: - compatible - Must be: + Must always include at least the generic compatiblity string: - "xen,<type>", "xen,multiboot-module" + "multiboot,module" - where <type> must be one of: + Optionally a more specific compatible string may be used in + addition to the above. One of: - - "linux-zimage" -- the dom0 kernel - - "linux-initrd" -- the dom0 ramdisk - - "xsm-policy" -- XSM policy blob + - "multiboot,kernel" -- the dom0 kernel + - "multiboot,ramdisk" -- the dom0 ramdisk + - "xen,xsm-policy" -- XSM policy blob + + It is normally recommended to include a more specific + compatible string (if one applies) in addition to the generic + string (which must always be present). + + Xen 4.4 supported a different set of legacy compatible strings + which remain supported such that systems supporting both 4.4 + and later can use a single DTB. + + - "xen,multiboot-module" equivalent to "multiboot,module" + - "xen,linux-zimage" equivalent to "multiboot,kernel" + - "xen,linux-initrd" equivalent to "multiboot,ramdisk" + + For compatibility with Xen 4.4 the more specific "xen,linux-*" + names are non-optional and must be included. - reg @@ -29,6 +45,32 @@ Each node contains the following properties: priority of this field vs. other mechanisms of specifying the bootargs for the kernel. +Examples +======== + +A boot module of unspecified type: + + module@0xc0000000 { + compatible = "multiboot,module"; + reg = <0xc0000000 0x1234>; + bootargs = "..."; + }; + +A boot module containing a ramdisk: + + module@0xd0000000 { + compatible = "multiboot,ramdisk", "multiboot,module"; + reg = <0xd0000000 0x5678>; + }; + +The previous examples are compatible with Xen 4.5+ only. + +To be compatible with Xen 4.4 as well use the legacy names: + + module@0xd0000000 { + compatible = "xen,linux-initrd", "xen,multiboot-module"; + reg = <0xd0000000 0x5678>; + }; Command lines =============
Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> --- v2: (Try to) Clarify some wording, add examples to help. --- docs/misc/arm/device-tree/booting.txt | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)