| Message ID | 1401191863-9404-1-git-send-email-sachin.kamat@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
On Tuesday 27 May 2014 17:27:43 Sachin Kamat wrote: > Variables local to this file are made static. > > Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org> > --- > arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Looks good to me, but you forgot to take the maintainer on Cc. How should we handle this patch? I guess this is the only one for vt8500 in 3.16, so I can pick it up directly with Tony's Ack. > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c b/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c > index 4a73464cb11b..2da7be31e7e2 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c > @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ > > static void __iomem *pmc_base; > > -void vt8500_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd) > +static void vt8500_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd) > { > if (pmc_base) > writel(1, pmc_base + VT8500_PMSR_REG); > @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static struct map_desc vt8500_io_desc[] __initdata = { > }, > }; > > -void __init vt8500_map_io(void) > +static void __init vt8500_map_io(void) > { > iotable_init(vt8500_io_desc, ARRAY_SIZE(vt8500_io_desc)); > } > @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static void vt8500_power_off(void) > asm("mcr%? p15, 0, %0, c7, c0, 4" : : "r" (0)); > } > > -void __init vt8500_init(void) > +static void __init vt8500_init(void) > { > struct device_node *np; > #if defined(CONFIG_FB_VT8500) || defined(CONFIG_FB_WM8505) >
On 28/05/14 00:05, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 27 May 2014 17:27:43 Sachin Kamat wrote: >> Variables local to this file are made static. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org> >> --- >> arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c | 6 +++--- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > > Looks good to me, but you forgot to take the maintainer on Cc. > > How should we handle this patch? I guess this is the only one > for vt8500 in 3.16, so I can pick it up directly with Tony's > Ack. > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c b/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c >> index 4a73464cb11b..2da7be31e7e2 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c >> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ >> >> static void __iomem *pmc_base; >> >> -void vt8500_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd) >> +static void vt8500_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd) >> { >> if (pmc_base) >> writel(1, pmc_base + VT8500_PMSR_REG); >> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static struct map_desc vt8500_io_desc[] __initdata = { >> }, >> }; >> >> -void __init vt8500_map_io(void) >> +static void __init vt8500_map_io(void) >> { >> iotable_init(vt8500_io_desc, ARRAY_SIZE(vt8500_io_desc)); >> } >> @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static void vt8500_power_off(void) >> asm("mcr%? p15, 0, %0, c7, c0, 4" : : "r" (0)); >> } >> >> -void __init vt8500_init(void) >> +static void __init vt8500_init(void) >> { >> struct device_node *np; >> #if defined(CONFIG_FB_VT8500) || defined(CONFIG_FB_WM8505) >> Acked-by: Tony Prisk <linux@prisktech.co.nz> Can you pick this up please Arnd? Doesn't look like there will be anything else for 3.16 Regards Tony P
On 30 May 2014 02:14, Tony Prisk <linux@prisktech.co.nz> wrote: > > On 28/05/14 00:05, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> >> On Tuesday 27 May 2014 17:27:43 Sachin Kamat wrote: >>> >>> Variables local to this file are made static. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org> >>> --- >>> arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c | 6 +++--- >>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> >> >> Looks good to me, but you forgot to take the maintainer on Cc. >> >> How should we handle this patch? I guess this is the only one >> for vt8500 in 3.16, so I can pick it up directly with Tony's >> Ack. >> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c >>> b/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c >>> index 4a73464cb11b..2da7be31e7e2 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c >>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c >>> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ >>> static void __iomem *pmc_base; >>> -void vt8500_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd) >>> +static void vt8500_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd) >>> { >>> if (pmc_base) >>> writel(1, pmc_base + VT8500_PMSR_REG); >>> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static struct map_desc vt8500_io_desc[] __initdata = { >>> }, >>> }; >>> -void __init vt8500_map_io(void) >>> +static void __init vt8500_map_io(void) >>> { >>> iotable_init(vt8500_io_desc, ARRAY_SIZE(vt8500_io_desc)); >>> } >>> @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static void vt8500_power_off(void) >>> asm("mcr%? p15, 0, %0, c7, c0, 4" : : "r" (0)); >>> } >>> -void __init vt8500_init(void) >>> +static void __init vt8500_init(void) >>> { >>> struct device_node *np; >>> #if defined(CONFIG_FB_VT8500) || defined(CONFIG_FB_WM8505) >>> > Acked-by: Tony Prisk <linux@prisktech.co.nz> Thanks Tony. > Can you pick this up please Arnd? Doesn't look like there will be anything > else for 3.16 Arnd, I have a few more similar patches for other platforms (mvebu, sti, spear). Can I send them as well along with the accumulated acks for you to apply? --- With warm regards, Sachin
On Friday 30 May 2014 11:49:02 Sachin Kamat wrote: > > I have a few more similar patches for other platforms (mvebu, sti, spear). > Can I send them as well along with the accumulated acks for you to apply? Yes, that's fine. If you can, please send a pull request with the lot to arm@kernel.org, with the maintainers and linux-arm-kernel on Cc. Arnd
On 30 May 2014 20:23, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > On Friday 30 May 2014 11:49:02 Sachin Kamat wrote: >> >> I have a few more similar patches for other platforms (mvebu, sti, spear). >> Can I send them as well along with the accumulated acks for you to apply? > > Yes, that's fine. If you can, please send a pull request with the lot > to arm@kernel.org, with the maintainers and linux-arm-kernel on Cc. Actually, I happened to post all the 8 patches to linux-arm-kernel with the respective maintainers and you in Cc before leaving for the weekend (The first patch in the series being "[PATCH Resend 1/8] ARM: sti: Staticize local variables"). Please see if you can pick them up. Else I will send you a pull request on Monday.
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c b/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c index 4a73464cb11b..2da7be31e7e2 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ static void __iomem *pmc_base; -void vt8500_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd) +static void vt8500_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd) { if (pmc_base) writel(1, pmc_base + VT8500_PMSR_REG); @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static struct map_desc vt8500_io_desc[] __initdata = { }, }; -void __init vt8500_map_io(void) +static void __init vt8500_map_io(void) { iotable_init(vt8500_io_desc, ARRAY_SIZE(vt8500_io_desc)); } @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static void vt8500_power_off(void) asm("mcr%? p15, 0, %0, c7, c0, 4" : : "r" (0)); } -void __init vt8500_init(void) +static void __init vt8500_init(void) { struct device_node *np; #if defined(CONFIG_FB_VT8500) || defined(CONFIG_FB_WM8505)
Variables local to this file are made static. Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org> --- arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)