diff mbox series

[4.9,091/121] btrfs: dont force read-only after error in drop snapshot

Message ID 20200929105934.689974556@linuxfoundation.org
State New
Headers show
Series None | expand

Commit Message

Greg KH Sept. 29, 2020, 11 a.m. UTC 
From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

[ Upstream commit 7c09c03091ac562ddca2b393e5d65c1d37da79f1 ]

Deleting a subvolume on a full filesystem leads to ENOSPC followed by a
forced read-only. This is not a transaction abort and the filesystem is
otherwise ok, so the error should be just propagated to the callers.

This is caused by unnecessary call to btrfs_handle_fs_error for all
errors, except EAGAIN. This does not make sense as the standard
transaction abort mechanism is in btrfs_drop_snapshot so all relevant
failures are handled.

Originally in commit cb1b69f4508a ("Btrfs: forced readonly when
btrfs_drop_snapshot() fails") there was no return value at all, so the
btrfs_std_error made some sense but once the error handling and
propagation has been implemented we don't need it anymore.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index c0033a0d00787..b5bff1e760a34 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -9435,8 +9435,6 @@  out:
 	 */
 	if (!for_reloc && root_dropped == false)
 		btrfs_add_dead_root(root);
-	if (err && err != -EAGAIN)
-		btrfs_handle_fs_error(fs_info, err, NULL);
 	return err;
 }