| Message ID | 20201015184416.38999-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v2,1/3] lib/list_kunit: Follow new file name convention for KUnit tests | expand |
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 2:44 AM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > Follow new file name convention for the KUnit tests. > Since we have lib/*test*.c in a few variations, > use 'kunit' suffix to distinguish usual test cases > with KUnit-based ones. > > Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Thanks! You've saved me the work of doing this myself. :-) Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 2:44 AM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > Follow new file name convention for the KUnit tests. > Since we have lib/*test*.c in a few variations, > use 'kunit' suffix to distinguish usual test cases > with KUnit-based ones. > > Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> > Cc: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Thanks. This looks good to me from an "I tested it and it worked" and a "matches the naming guidelines" point of view. (Since the naming documentation isn't actually in Linus' branch yet, I'll drop a link to it here: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git/tree/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/style.rst?h=kunit ) I'm not the test author though, and the naming doc does explicitly leave the possibility of keeping the old filenames for tests if there's a particularly good reason to (e.g., a lot depending on the module name). I'm not aware of any such thing, and so am in favour of the rename, but will defer to the test authors on that point if they object. Either way, Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Cheers, -- David
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 01:02:20PM +0800, David Gow wrote: > On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 2:44 AM Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > Follow new file name convention for the KUnit tests. > > Since we have lib/*test*.c in a few variations, > > use 'kunit' suffix to distinguish usual test cases > > with KUnit-based ones. > > > > Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> > > Cc: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com> > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> > > Thanks. This looks good to me from an "I tested it and it worked" and > a "matches the naming guidelines" point of view. > > (Since the naming documentation isn't actually in Linus' branch yet, > I'll drop a link to it here: > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git/tree/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/style.rst?h=kunit > ) > > I'm not the test author though, and the naming doc does explicitly > leave the possibility of keeping the old filenames for tests if > there's a particularly good reason to (e.g., a lot depending on the > module name). Can you point out to this? Briefly looking into I haven't found that. > I'm not aware of any such thing, and so am in favour of > the rename, but will defer to the test authors on that point if they > object. > Either way, > Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Thanks! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 09:44:15PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Follow new file name convention for the KUnit tests. > Since we have lib/*test*.c in a few variations, > use 'kunit' suffix to distinguish usual test cases > with KUnit-based ones. I'm missing the rest of this series - what's the story with dependencies here?
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 11:38:41AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 09:44:15PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > Follow new file name convention for the KUnit tests. > > Since we have lib/*test*.c in a few variations, > > use 'kunit' suffix to distinguish usual test cases > > with KUnit-based ones. > > I'm missing the rest of this series - what's the story with dependencies > here? There is a dependency in Makefile. Do you want me to send a new version with Cc'ing you all? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 02:03:44PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 11:38:41AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 09:44:15PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > I'm missing the rest of this series - what's the story with dependencies > > here? > > There is a dependency in Makefile. Do you want me to send a new version with > Cc'ing you all? v3 has been sent. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 02:03:44PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 11:38:41AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > I'm missing the rest of this series - what's the story with dependencies > > here? > There is a dependency in Makefile. Do you want me to send a new version with > Cc'ing you all? It's fine this time but please don't do this in future, people need at least a cover letter so they know how things rae related to each other.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 5:29 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 01:02:20PM +0800, David Gow wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 2:44 AM Andy Shevchenko > > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > Follow new file name convention for the KUnit tests. > > > Since we have lib/*test*.c in a few variations, > > > use 'kunit' suffix to distinguish usual test cases > > > with KUnit-based ones. > > > > > > Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> > > > Cc: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> > > > > Thanks. This looks good to me from an "I tested it and it worked" and > > a "matches the naming guidelines" point of view. > > > > (Since the naming documentation isn't actually in Linus' branch yet, > > I'll drop a link to it here: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git/tree/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/style.rst?h=kunit > > ) > > > > I'm not the test author though, and the naming doc does explicitly > > leave the possibility of keeping the old filenames for tests if > > there's a particularly good reason to (e.g., a lot depending on the > > module name). > > Can you point out to this? Briefly looking into I haven't found that. This was what was intended by the first "exemption" listed[1] at the beginning of the document: "It's recommended that you only deviate from these guidelines when: [...] Porting tests to KUnit which are already known with an existing name" Admittedly, this test was originally a KUnit test, rather than a port of another test, so the exact wording probably doesn't apply here, but that's more an artefact of the naming guidelines landing after this test did. The goal here is really just to make sure that existing test modules can be ported to KUnit without breaking existing users which may depend on the name. It doesn't look like that applies for this test, though. Cheers, -- David [1]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git/tree/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/style.rst?h=kunit#n13
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 4538378de6f5..20facbca9388 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -10188,7 +10188,7 @@ M: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> L: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org L: kunit-dev@googlegroups.com S: Maintained -F: lib/list-test.c +F: lib/list_kunit.c LIVE PATCHING M: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> diff --git a/lib/Makefile b/lib/Makefile index 5ca03ba6ee45..1a5e6a6ebe8d 100644 --- a/lib/Makefile +++ b/lib/Makefile @@ -350,6 +350,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PLDMFW) += pldmfw/ # KUnit tests obj-$(CONFIG_BITFIELD_KUNIT) += bitfield_kunit.o -obj-$(CONFIG_LIST_KUNIT_TEST) += list-test.o +obj-$(CONFIG_LIST_KUNIT_TEST) += list_kunit.o obj-$(CONFIG_LINEAR_RANGES_TEST) += test_linear_ranges.o obj-$(CONFIG_BITS_TEST) += test_bits.o diff --git a/lib/list-test.c b/lib/list_kunit.c similarity index 100% rename from lib/list-test.c rename to lib/list_kunit.c
Follow new file name convention for the KUnit tests. Since we have lib/*test*.c in a few variations, use 'kunit' suffix to distinguish usual test cases with KUnit-based ones. Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> --- v2: followed new convention MAINTAINERS | 2 +- lib/Makefile | 2 +- lib/{list-test.c => list_kunit.c} | 0 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) rename lib/{list-test.c => list_kunit.c} (100%)