@@ -201,14 +201,14 @@ void helper_scmpu(CPURXState *env)
if (env->regs[3] == 0) {
return;
}
- while (env->regs[3] != 0) {
+ do {
tmp0 = cpu_ldub_data_ra(env, env->regs[1]++, GETPC());
tmp1 = cpu_ldub_data_ra(env, env->regs[2]++, GETPC());
env->regs[3]--;
if (tmp0 != tmp1 || tmp0 == '\0') {
break;
}
- }
+ } while (env->regs[3] != 0);
env->psw_z = tmp0 - tmp1;
env->psw_c = (tmp0 >= tmp1);
}
@@ -287,14 +287,14 @@ void helper_suntil(CPURXState *env, uint32_t sz)
if (env->regs[3] == 0) {
return ;
}
- while (env->regs[3] != 0) {
+ do {
tmp = cpu_ldufn[sz](env, env->regs[1], GETPC());
env->regs[1] += 1 << sz;
env->regs[3]--;
if (tmp == env->regs[2]) {
break;
}
- }
+ } while (env->regs[3] != 0);
env->psw_z = tmp - env->regs[2];
env->psw_c = (tmp <= env->regs[2]);
}
@@ -306,14 +306,14 @@ void helper_swhile(CPURXState *env, uint32_t sz)
if (env->regs[3] == 0) {
return ;
}
- while (env->regs[3] != 0) {
+ do {
tmp = cpu_ldufn[sz](env, env->regs[1], GETPC());
env->regs[1] += 1 << sz;
env->regs[3]--;
if (tmp != env->regs[2]) {
break;
}
- }
+ } while (env->regs[3] != 0);
env->psw_z = env->regs[3];
env->psw_c = (tmp <= env->regs[2]);
}
We got the following compile-time warnings(gcc7.3): /mnt/sdb//qemu/target/rx/op_helper.c: In function ‘helper_scmpu’: /mnt/sdb/qemu/target/rx/op_helper.c:213:24: error: ‘tmp1’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] env->psw_c = (tmp0 >= tmp1); ~~~~~~^~~~~~~~ /mnt/sdb/qemu/target/rx/op_helper.c:213:24: error: ‘tmp0’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] /mnt/sdb/qemu/target/rx/op_helper.c: In function ‘helper_suntil’: /mnt/sdb/qemu/target/rx/op_helper.c:299:23: error: ‘tmp’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] env->psw_c = (tmp <= env->regs[2]); ~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /mnt/sdb/qemu/target/rx/op_helper.c: In function ‘helper_swhile’: /mnt/sdb/qemu/target/rx/op_helper.c:318:23: error: ‘tmp’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] env->psw_c = (tmp <= env->regs[2]); Actually, it looks like a false-positive because it will enter the body of while loop and init it for the first time. Let's change 'while' to 'do .. while' to avoid it. Reported-by: Euler Robot <euler.robot@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Pan Nengyuan <pannengyuan@huawei.com> --- target/rx/op_helper.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)