Message ID | 20200502194642.32823-1-laurent@vivier.eu |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | linux-user, alpha: fix oldumount syscall | expand |
diff --git a/linux-user/syscall.c b/linux-user/syscall.c index 05f03919ff07..e89b815ce983 100644 --- a/linux-user/syscall.c +++ b/linux-user/syscall.c @@ -8028,8 +8028,13 @@ static abi_long do_syscall1(void *cpu_env, int num, abi_long arg1, } } return ret; -#ifdef TARGET_NR_umount +#if defined(TARGET_NR_umount) || defined(TARGET_NR_oldumount) +#if defined(TARGET_NR_umount) case TARGET_NR_umount: +#endif +#if defined(TARGET_NR_oldumount) + case TARGET_NR_oldumount: +#endif if (!(p = lock_user_string(arg1))) return -TARGET_EFAULT; ret = get_errno(umount(p));
When we try to bootstrap debian/lenny for alpha, it fails because it cannot umount /.root directory: ... Setting up initscripts (2.86.ds1-61) ... umount: /.root: Function not implemented dpkg: error processing initscripts (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 dpkg: sysvinit: dependency problems, but configuring anyway as you request: sysvinit depends on initscripts; however: Package initscripts is not configured yet. This is because, when we switched from syscall_nr.h to syscall.tbl, the syscall #321 has been renamed from umount to oldumount and syscall.c has not been updated to manage the new name. oldumount has been introduced in linux 2.1.116pre1 by: 7d32756b2 ("Import 2.1.116pre1") ... * We now support a flag for forced unmount like the other 'big iron' * unixes. Our API is identical to OSF/1 to avoid making a mess of AMD ... Fixes: 6116aea994 ("linux-user, alpha: add syscall table generation support") Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu> --- linux-user/syscall.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)