@@ -269,16 +269,9 @@ bool tick_check_replacement(struct clock_event_device *curdev,
*/
void tick_check_new_device(struct clock_event_device *newdev)
{
- struct clock_event_device *curdev;
- struct tick_device *td;
- int cpu;
-
- cpu = smp_processor_id();
- if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, newdev->cpumask))
- goto out_bc;
-
- td = tick_get_device(cpu);
- curdev = td->evtdev;
+ int cpu = smp_processor_id();
+ struct tick_device *td = tick_get_device(cpu);
+ struct clock_event_device *curdev = td->evtdev;
/* cpu local device ? */
if (!tick_check_percpu(curdev, newdev, cpu))
tick_check_new_device() is calling tick_check_percpu() which has this as the first test: if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, newdev->cpumask)) return false; And so the same isn't required to be repeated by tick_check_new_device(). Remove it. This also initializes several variables during their definition only. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> --- kernel/time/tick-common.c | 13 +++---------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)