| Message ID | 20201014135416.1290679-3-pbonzini@redhat.com |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | build: replace ninjatool with ninja | expand |
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 09:54:11AM -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Without pipefail, it is possible to miss failures if the recipes > include pipes. > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> > --- > Makefile | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index c37e513431..5e51e61c3b 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -14,6 +14,8 @@ SRC_PATH=. # we have explicit rules for everything MAKEFLAGS += -rR +SHELL = /usr/bin/env bash -o pipefail + # Usage: $(call quiet-command,command and args,"NAME","args to print") # This will run "command and args", and either: # if V=1 just print the whole command and args
Without pipefail, it is possible to miss failures if the recipes include pipes. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> --- Makefile | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)