@@ -1652,14 +1652,13 @@ void cpufreq_resume(void)
cpufreq_suspended = false;
list_for_each_entry(policy, &cpufreq_policy_list, policy_list) {
- if (__cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START)
+ if (cpufreq_driver->resume && cpufreq_driver->resume(policy))
+ pr_err("%s: Failed to resume driver: %p\n", __func__,
+ policy);
+ else if (__cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START)
|| __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS))
pr_err("%s: Failed to start governor for policy: %p\n",
__func__, policy);
- else if (cpufreq_driver->resume
- && cpufreq_driver->resume(policy))
- pr_err("%s: Failed to resume driver: %p\n", __func__,
- policy);
/*
* schedule call cpufreq_update_policy() for boot CPU, i.e. last
During suspend, we first stop governors and then suspend cpufreq drivers and resume must be exactly opposite of that. i.e. resume drivers first and then start governors. But the current code in resume enables governors first and then resume drivers. Fix it be changing code sequence there. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> --- For 3.15-rc2 .. drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 9 ++++----- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)