@@ -6612,12 +6612,13 @@ void netif_napi_add(struct net_device *dev, struct napi_struct *napi,
netdev_err_once(dev, "%s() called with weight %d\n", __func__,
weight);
napi->weight = weight;
- list_add(&napi->dev_list, &dev->napi_list);
napi->dev = dev;
#ifdef CONFIG_NETPOLL
napi->poll_owner = -1;
#endif
set_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED, &napi->state);
+ set_bit(NAPI_STATE_NPSVC, &napi->state);
+ list_add_rcu(&napi->dev_list, &dev->napi_list);
napi_hash_add(napi);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netif_napi_add);
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ static void poll_napi(struct net_device *dev)
struct napi_struct *napi;
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
- list_for_each_entry(napi, &dev->napi_list, dev_list) {
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(napi, &dev->napi_list, dev_list) {
if (cmpxchg(&napi->poll_owner, -1, cpu) == -1) {
poll_one_napi(napi);
smp_store_release(&napi->poll_owner, -1);
napi_disable() makes sure to set the NAPI_STATE_NPSVC bit to prevent netpoll from accessing rings before init is complete. However, the same is not done for fresh napi instances in netif_napi_add(), even though we expect NAPI instances to be added as disabled. This causes crashes during driver reconfiguration (enabling XDP, changing the channel count) - if there is any printk() after netif_napi_add() but before napi_enable(). To ensure memory ordering is correct we need to use RCU accessors. Reported-by: Rob Sherwood <rsher@fb.com> Fixes: 2d8bff12699a ("netpoll: Close race condition between poll_one_napi and napi_disable") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> --- net/core/dev.c | 3 ++- net/core/netpoll.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)