Message ID | 1600481766-46158-1-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [net-next] net: hns3: remove unnecessary NULL checking in napi_consume_skb() | expand |
Please ignore this patch, the title is not right, sorry for the noise. On 2020/9/19 10:16, Yunsheng Lin wrote: > When budget is non-zero, skb_unref() has already handled the > NULL checking. > > When budget is zero, the dev_consume_skb_any() has handled NULL > checking in __dev_kfree_skb_irq(), or dev_kfree_skb() which also > ultimately call skb_unref(). > > So remove the unnecessary checking in napi_consume_skb(). > > Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com> > --- > net/core/skbuff.c | 3 --- > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c > index bfd7483..e077447 100644 > --- a/net/core/skbuff.c > +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c > @@ -895,9 +895,6 @@ void __kfree_skb_defer(struct sk_buff *skb) > > void napi_consume_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, int budget) > { > - if (unlikely(!skb)) > - return; > - > /* Zero budget indicate non-NAPI context called us, like netpoll */ > if (unlikely(!budget)) { > dev_consume_skb_any(skb); >
diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c index bfd7483..e077447 100644 --- a/net/core/skbuff.c +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c @@ -895,9 +895,6 @@ void __kfree_skb_defer(struct sk_buff *skb) void napi_consume_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, int budget) { - if (unlikely(!skb)) - return; - /* Zero budget indicate non-NAPI context called us, like netpoll */ if (unlikely(!budget)) { dev_consume_skb_any(skb);
When budget is non-zero, skb_unref() has already handled the NULL checking. When budget is zero, the dev_consume_skb_any() has handled NULL checking in __dev_kfree_skb_irq(), or dev_kfree_skb() which also ultimately call skb_unref(). So remove the unnecessary checking in napi_consume_skb(). Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com> --- net/core/skbuff.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)