Message ID | 20200929130446.0c2630d2@canb.auug.org.au |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree | expand |
Hi all, On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 13:04:46 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > > After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_main.c: In function 'prestera_port_dev_lower_find': > drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_main.c:504:33: error: passing argument 2 of 'netdev_walk_all_lower_dev' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types] > 504 | netdev_walk_all_lower_dev(dev, prestera_lower_dev_walk, &port); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | | > | int (*)(struct net_device *, void *) > In file included from include/linux/etherdevice.h:21, > from drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_main.c:4: > include/linux/netdevice.h:4571:16: note: expected 'int (*)(struct net_device *, struct netdev_nested_priv *)' but argument is of type 'int (*)(struct net_device *, void *)' > 4571 | int (*fn)(struct net_device *lower_dev, > | ~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > 4572 | struct netdev_nested_priv *priv), > | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_main.c:504:58: error: passing argument 3 of 'netdev_walk_all_lower_dev' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types] > 504 | netdev_walk_all_lower_dev(dev, prestera_lower_dev_walk, &port); > | ^~~~~ > | | > | struct prestera_port ** > In file included from include/linux/etherdevice.h:21, > from drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_main.c:4: > include/linux/netdevice.h:4573:37: note: expected 'struct netdev_nested_priv *' but argument is of type 'struct prestera_port **' > 4573 | struct netdev_nested_priv *priv); > | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~ > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > > Caused by commit > > eff7423365a6 ("net: core: introduce struct netdev_nested_priv for nested interface infrastructure") > > interacting with commit > > e1189d9a5fbe ("net: marvell: prestera: Add Switchdev driver implementation") > > also in the net-next tree. > > I applied the following fix patch. > > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> > Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 12:57:59 +1000 > Subject: [PATCH] fix up for "net: core: introduce struct netdev_nested_priv for nested interface infrastructure" > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_main.c | 9 ++++++--- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_main.c > index 9bd57b89d1d0..633d8770be35 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_main.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_main.c > @@ -482,9 +482,10 @@ bool prestera_netdev_check(const struct net_device *dev) > return dev->netdev_ops == &prestera_netdev_ops; > } > > -static int prestera_lower_dev_walk(struct net_device *dev, void *data) > +static int prestera_lower_dev_walk(struct net_device *dev, > + struct netdev_nested_priv *priv) > { > - struct prestera_port **pport = data; > + struct prestera_port **pport = (struct prestera_port **)priv->data; > > if (prestera_netdev_check(dev)) { > *pport = netdev_priv(dev); > @@ -497,11 +498,13 @@ static int prestera_lower_dev_walk(struct net_device *dev, void *data) > struct prestera_port *prestera_port_dev_lower_find(struct net_device *dev) > { > struct prestera_port *port = NULL; > + struct netdev_nested_priv priv; > > if (prestera_netdev_check(dev)) > return netdev_priv(dev); > > - netdev_walk_all_lower_dev(dev, prestera_lower_dev_walk, &port); > + priv.data = (void *)&port; > + netdev_walk_all_lower_dev(dev, prestera_lower_dev_walk, &priv); > > return port; > } I am still getting this build failure ...
Hi Stephen, On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 08:09:16AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > [CUT] > > I am still getting this build failure ... > > -- I just 've checked linux-next/master and it builds fine at least with my custom config, do/how I need to handle this case ? I see the changes you applied already in linux-next/master. > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell
Hi Vadym, On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 02:06:05 +0300 Vadym Kochan <vadym.kochan@plvision.eu> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 08:09:16AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > [CUT] > > > > I am still getting this build failure ... > > > > -- > > I just 've checked linux-next/master and it builds fine at least with my custom > config, do/how I need to handle this case ? If you take the net-next tree alone and do an x86_64 allmodconfig build, it currently fails, right? > I see the changes you applied already in linux-next/master. Linux-next builds fine because it contains the fix patch I posted (I added it to the net-next merge). It needs to be explicitly fixed in the net-next tree either using my patch or something more correct (if necessary).
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 13:04:46 +1000 > Caused by commit > > eff7423365a6 ("net: core: introduce struct netdev_nested_priv for nested interface infrastructure") > > interacting with commit > > e1189d9a5fbe ("net: marvell: prestera: Add Switchdev driver implementation") > > also in the net-next tree. I would argue against that "also" as the first commit is only in the 'net' tree right now. :-) This is simply something I'll have to resolve the next time net is merged into net-next. Thanks.
Hi Dave, On Thu, 01 Oct 2020 18:40:13 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote: > > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> > Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 13:04:46 +1000 > > > Caused by commit > > > > eff7423365a6 ("net: core: introduce struct netdev_nested_priv for nested interface infrastructure") > > > > interacting with commit > > > > e1189d9a5fbe ("net: marvell: prestera: Add Switchdev driver implementation") > > > > also in the net-next tree. > > I would argue against that "also" as the first commit is only in the > 'net' tree right now. :-) Sorry, my mistake. I was wondering why your testing did not seem to be affected. > This is simply something I'll have to resolve the next time net is merged > into net-next. Absolutely, no problem.
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_main.c index 9bd57b89d1d0..633d8770be35 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_main.c @@ -482,9 +482,10 @@ bool prestera_netdev_check(const struct net_device *dev) return dev->netdev_ops == &prestera_netdev_ops; } -static int prestera_lower_dev_walk(struct net_device *dev, void *data) +static int prestera_lower_dev_walk(struct net_device *dev, + struct netdev_nested_priv *priv) { - struct prestera_port **pport = data; + struct prestera_port **pport = (struct prestera_port **)priv->data; if (prestera_netdev_check(dev)) { *pport = netdev_priv(dev); @@ -497,11 +498,13 @@ static int prestera_lower_dev_walk(struct net_device *dev, void *data) struct prestera_port *prestera_port_dev_lower_find(struct net_device *dev) { struct prestera_port *port = NULL; + struct netdev_nested_priv priv; if (prestera_netdev_check(dev)) return netdev_priv(dev); - netdev_walk_all_lower_dev(dev, prestera_lower_dev_walk, &port); + priv.data = (void *)&port; + netdev_walk_all_lower_dev(dev, prestera_lower_dev_walk, &priv); return port; }