| Message ID | 20200821211716.1631556-1-briannorris@chromium.org |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | rtw88: don't treat NULL pointer as an array | expand |
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c index 8d93f3159746..9687b376d221 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c @@ -147,12 +147,13 @@ void rtw_phy_dig_write(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, u8 igi) { struct rtw_chip_info *chip = rtwdev->chip; struct rtw_hal *hal = &rtwdev->hal; - const struct rtw_hw_reg *dig_cck = &chip->dig_cck[0]; u32 addr, mask; u8 path; - if (dig_cck) + if (chip->dig_cck) { + const struct rtw_hw_reg *dig_cck = &chip->dig_cck[0]; rtw_write32_mask(rtwdev, dig_cck->addr, dig_cck->mask, igi >> 1); + } for (path = 0; path < hal->rf_path_num; path++) { addr = chip->dig[path].addr;
I'm not a standards expert, but this really looks to be undefined behavior, when chip->dig_cck may be NULL. (And, we're trying to do a NULL check a few lines down, because some chip variants will use NULL.) Fixes: fc637a860a82 ("rtw88: 8723d: Set IG register for CCK rate") Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> --- drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)