@@ -774,8 +774,15 @@ void *kill_thread(void *data)
return (void *)SIBLING_EXIT_UNKILLED;
}
+enum kill_t {
+ KILL_THREAD,
+ KILL_PROCESS,
+ RET_UNKNOWN
+};
+
/* Prepare a thread that will kill itself or both of us. */
-void kill_thread_or_group(struct __test_metadata *_metadata, bool kill_process)
+void kill_thread_or_group(struct __test_metadata *_metadata,
+ enum kill_t kill_how)
{
pthread_t thread;
void *status;
@@ -791,11 +798,12 @@ void kill_thread_or_group(struct __test_metadata *_metadata, bool kill_process)
.len = (unsigned short)ARRAY_SIZE(filter_thread),
.filter = filter_thread,
};
+ int kill = kill_how == KILL_PROCESS ? SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS : 0xAAAAAAAAA;
struct sock_filter filter_process[] = {
BPF_STMT(BPF_LD|BPF_W|BPF_ABS,
offsetof(struct seccomp_data, nr)),
BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K, __NR_prctl, 0, 1),
- BPF_STMT(BPF_RET|BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS),
+ BPF_STMT(BPF_RET|BPF_K, kill),
BPF_STMT(BPF_RET|BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW),
};
struct sock_fprog prog_process = {
@@ -808,13 +816,15 @@ void kill_thread_or_group(struct __test_metadata *_metadata, bool kill_process)
}
ASSERT_EQ(0, seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, 0,
- kill_process ? &prog_process : &prog_thread));
+ kill_how == KILL_THREAD ? &prog_thread
+ : &prog_process));
/*
* Add the KILL_THREAD rule again to make sure that the KILL_PROCESS
* flag cannot be downgraded by a new filter.
*/
- ASSERT_EQ(0, seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, 0, &prog_thread));
+ if (kill_how == KILL_PROCESS)
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, 0, &prog_thread));
/* Start a thread that will exit immediately. */
ASSERT_EQ(0, pthread_create(&thread, NULL, kill_thread, (void *)false));
@@ -842,7 +852,7 @@ TEST(KILL_thread)
child_pid = fork();
ASSERT_LE(0, child_pid);
if (child_pid == 0) {
- kill_thread_or_group(_metadata, false);
+ kill_thread_or_group(_metadata, KILL_THREAD);
_exit(38);
}
@@ -861,7 +871,7 @@ TEST(KILL_process)
child_pid = fork();
ASSERT_LE(0, child_pid);
if (child_pid == 0) {
- kill_thread_or_group(_metadata, true);
+ kill_thread_or_group(_metadata, KILL_PROCESS);
_exit(38);
}
@@ -872,6 +882,27 @@ TEST(KILL_process)
ASSERT_EQ(SIGSYS, WTERMSIG(status));
}
+TEST(KILL_unknown)
+{
+ int status;
+ pid_t child_pid;
+
+ child_pid = fork();
+ ASSERT_LE(0, child_pid);
+ if (child_pid == 0) {
+ kill_thread_or_group(_metadata, RET_UNKNOWN);
+ _exit(38);
+ }
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(child_pid, waitpid(child_pid, &status, 0));
+
+ /* If the entire process was killed, we'll see SIGSYS. */
+ EXPECT_TRUE(WIFSIGNALED(status)) {
+ TH_LOG("Unknown SECCOMP_RET is only killing the thread?");
+ }
+ ASSERT_EQ(SIGSYS, WTERMSIG(status));
+}
+
/* TODO(wad) add 64-bit versus 32-bit arg tests. */
TEST(arg_out_of_range)
{
While we testing for the behavior of unknown seccomp filter return values, there was no test for how it acted in a thread group. Add a test in the thread group tests for this. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> --- (This is going via the seccomp tree.) --- tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)