| Message ID | 20200519184509.21729-1-walter.lozano@collabora.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | doc: rockchip: Update documentation with Rock Pi 4 | expand |
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 12:15 AM Walter Lozano <walter.lozano at collabora.com> wrote: > > Update README.rockchip to reflect the support of Radxa Rock Pi 4 > > Signed-off-by: Walter Lozano <walter.lozano at collabora.com> > --- > doc/README.rockchip | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) We have doc/board/rockchip please update there. Jagan.
Hi Jagan On 19/5/20 15:57, Jagan Teki wrote: > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 12:15 AM Walter Lozano > <walter.lozano at collabora.com> wrote: >> Update README.rockchip to reflect the support of Radxa Rock Pi 4 >> >> Signed-off-by: Walter Lozano <walter.lozano at collabora.com> >> --- >> doc/README.rockchip | 3 ++- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > We have doc/board/rockchip please update there. Documentation in doc/board/rockchip already states the support for Radxa Rock Pi 4. Unfortunately having two different documentation which overlaps tends to be redundancy prone. At this point I think that the best approach it to spawn two tasks 1- Update the doc/README.rockchip with any specific information which needs to be updated 2- Continue to move doc/README.rockchip to doc/board/rockchip as you started to do I might find some time to work in task 2, but in the meantime I think this patch goes in the direction of task 1 Do you agree? Regards, Walter
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 05:29:31PM -0300, Walter Lozano wrote: > Hi Jagan > > On 19/5/20 15:57, Jagan Teki wrote: > > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 12:15 AM Walter Lozano > > <walter.lozano at collabora.com> wrote: > > > Update README.rockchip to reflect the support of Radxa Rock Pi 4 > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Walter Lozano <walter.lozano at collabora.com> > > > --- > > > doc/README.rockchip | 3 ++- > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > We have doc/board/rockchip please update there. > > Documentation in doc/board/rockchip already states the support for Radxa > Rock Pi 4. Unfortunately having two different documentation which overlaps > tends to be redundancy prone. > > > At this point I think that the best approach it to spawn two tasks > > 1- Update the doc/README.rockchip with any specific information which needs > to be updated > > 2- Continue to move doc/README.rockchip to doc/board/rockchip as you started > to do > > > I might find some time to work in task 2, but in the meantime I think this > patch goes in the direction of task 1 > > > Do you agree? I'd like to see doc/README.rockchip go away in favour of doc/board/rockchip/ as soon as possible, especially since this is an area with active development. I'd rather see an update to doc/README.rockchip saying that doc/board/rockchip/rockchip.rst has the list of supported hardware as the step forward here. Thanks!
Hi Tom, On 19/5/20 18:02, Tom Rini wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 05:29:31PM -0300, Walter Lozano wrote: >> Hi Jagan >> >> On 19/5/20 15:57, Jagan Teki wrote: >>> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 12:15 AM Walter Lozano >>> <walter.lozano at collabora.com> wrote: >>>> Update README.rockchip to reflect the support of Radxa Rock Pi 4 >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Walter Lozano <walter.lozano at collabora.com> >>>> --- >>>> doc/README.rockchip | 3 ++- >>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> We have doc/board/rockchip please update there. >> Documentation in doc/board/rockchip already states the support for Radxa >> Rock Pi 4. Unfortunately having two different documentation which overlaps >> tends to be redundancy prone. >> >> >> At this point I think that the best approach it to spawn two tasks >> >> 1- Update the doc/README.rockchip with any specific information which needs >> to be updated >> >> 2- Continue to move doc/README.rockchip to doc/board/rockchip as you started >> to do >> >> >> I might find some time to work in task 2, but in the meantime I think this >> patch goes in the direction of task 1 >> >> >> Do you agree? > I'd like to see doc/README.rockchip go away in favour of > doc/board/rockchip/ as soon as possible, especially since this is an > area with active development. I'd rather see an update to > doc/README.rockchip saying that doc/board/rockchip/rockchip.rst has the > list of supported hardware as the step forward here. Thanks! > OK, it makes sense. I'll prepare such patch and send it. Regards, Walter
diff --git a/doc/README.rockchip b/doc/README.rockchip index 70c8798ed2..c6718e83c7 100644 --- a/doc/README.rockchip +++ b/doc/README.rockchip @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ Three RK3328 boards are supported: - Firefly / Libre Computer Project ROC-RK3328-CC board - use roc-cc-rk3328_defconfig -Size RK3399 boards are supported (aarch64): +Seven RK3399 boards are supported (aarch64): - EBV RK3399 - use evb_rk3399 configuration - Firefly RK3399 - use the firefly_rk3399 configuration @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ Size RK3399 boards are supported (aarch64): - Ficus - use ficus-rk3399 configuration - Rock960 (Vamrs) - use rock960-rk3399 configuration - Bob - use chromebook_bob configuration + - Radxa Rock Pi 4 - use rock-pi-4-rk3399_defconfig Four RK3368 boards are supported:
Update README.rockchip to reflect the support of Radxa Rock Pi 4 Signed-off-by: Walter Lozano <walter.lozano at collabora.com> --- doc/README.rockchip | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)