| Message ID | 20200618142328.1753036-8-heiko@sntech.de |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v6,1/8] lib: rsa: distinguish between tpl and spl for CONFIG_RSA_VERIFY | expand |
On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 08:23, Heiko Stuebner <heiko at sntech.de> wrote: > > From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner at theobroma-systems.com> > > Verifying FIT images obviously needs the rsa parts of crypto > support and while main uboot always compiles crypto support, > it's optional for SPL and we should thus select the necessary > option to not end up in compile errors like: > > u-boot/lib/rsa/rsa-verify.c:328: undefined reference to `rsa_mod_exp' > > So select SPL_CRYPTO_SUPPORT in SPL_FIT_SIGNATURE. > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner at theobroma-systems.com> > Reviewed-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich at theobroma-systems.com> > --- > Kconfig | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
diff --git a/Kconfig b/Kconfig index 091c500ecc..b34fbf5827 100644 --- a/Kconfig +++ b/Kconfig @@ -459,6 +459,7 @@ config SPL_FIT_SIGNATURE bool "Enable signature verification of FIT firmware within SPL" depends on SPL_DM select SPL_FIT + select SPL_CRYPTO_SUPPORT select SPL_HASH_SUPPORT select SPL_RSA select SPL_RSA_VERIFY