@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
#include <linux/ipv6.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/list.h>
+#include <linux/lockdep.h>
#include <linux/netdevice.h>
#include <linux/rculist.h>
#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
@@ -413,6 +414,9 @@ out:
* @bat_priv: the bat priv with all the soft interface information
* @orig_node: originator announcing gateway capabilities
* @gateway: announced bandwidth information
+ *
+ * Has to be called with the appropriate locks being acquired
+ * (gw.list_lock).
*/
static void batadv_gw_node_add(struct batadv_priv *bat_priv,
struct batadv_orig_node *orig_node,
@@ -420,6 +424,8 @@ static void batadv_gw_node_add(struct batadv_priv *bat_priv,
{
struct batadv_gw_node *gw_node;
+ lockdep_assert_held(&bat_priv->gw.list_lock);
+
if (gateway->bandwidth_down == 0)
return;
@@ -438,9 +444,7 @@ static void batadv_gw_node_add(struct batadv_priv *bat_priv,
gw_node->bandwidth_up = ntohl(gateway->bandwidth_up);
atomic_set(&gw_node->refcount, 1);
- spin_lock_bh(&bat_priv->gw.list_lock);
hlist_add_head_rcu(&gw_node->list, &bat_priv->gw.list);
- spin_unlock_bh(&bat_priv->gw.list_lock);
batadv_dbg(BATADV_DBG_BATMAN, bat_priv,
"Found new gateway %pM -> gw bandwidth: %u.%u/%u.%u MBit\n",
@@ -493,11 +497,14 @@ void batadv_gw_node_update(struct batadv_priv *bat_priv,
{
struct batadv_gw_node *gw_node, *curr_gw = NULL;
+ spin_lock_bh(&bat_priv->gw.list_lock);
gw_node = batadv_gw_node_get(bat_priv, orig_node);
if (!gw_node) {
batadv_gw_node_add(bat_priv, orig_node, gateway);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&bat_priv->gw.list_lock);
goto out;
}
+ spin_unlock_bh(&bat_priv->gw.list_lock);
if ((gw_node->bandwidth_down == ntohl(gateway->bandwidth_down)) &&
(gw_node->bandwidth_up == ntohl(gateway->bandwidth_up)))
commit dff9bc42ab0b2d38c5e90ddd79b238fed5b4c7ad upstream. The function batadv_gw_node_add is responsible for adding new gw_node to the gateway_list. It is expecting that the caller already checked that there is not already an entry with the same key or not. But the lock for the list is only held when the list is really modified. This could lead to duplicated entries because another context could create an entry with the same key between the check and the list manipulation. The check and the manipulation of the list must therefore be in the same locked code section. Fixes: c6c8fea29769 ("net: Add batman-adv meshing protocol") Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org> Acked-by: Marek Lindner <mareklindner@neomailbox.ch> Signed-off-by: Simon Wunderlich <sw@simonwunderlich.de> --- net/batman-adv/gateway_client.c | 11 +++++++++-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)