@@ -774,28 +774,40 @@ static void __do_notify(struct mqueue_in
* synchronously. */
if (info->notify_owner &&
info->attr.mq_curmsgs == 1) {
- struct kernel_siginfo sig_i;
switch (info->notify.sigev_notify) {
case SIGEV_NONE:
break;
- case SIGEV_SIGNAL:
- /* sends signal */
+ case SIGEV_SIGNAL: {
+ struct kernel_siginfo sig_i;
+ struct task_struct *task;
+
+ /* do_mq_notify() accepts sigev_signo == 0, why?? */
+ if (!info->notify.sigev_signo)
+ break;
clear_siginfo(&sig_i);
sig_i.si_signo = info->notify.sigev_signo;
sig_i.si_errno = 0;
sig_i.si_code = SI_MESGQ;
sig_i.si_value = info->notify.sigev_value;
- /* map current pid/uid into info->owner's namespaces */
rcu_read_lock();
+ /* map current pid/uid into info->owner's namespaces */
sig_i.si_pid = task_tgid_nr_ns(current,
ns_of_pid(info->notify_owner));
- sig_i.si_uid = from_kuid_munged(info->notify_user_ns, current_uid());
+ sig_i.si_uid = from_kuid_munged(info->notify_user_ns,
+ current_uid());
+ /*
+ * We can't use kill_pid_info(), this signal should
+ * bypass check_kill_permission(). It is from kernel
+ * but si_fromuser() can't know this.
+ */
+ task = pid_task(info->notify_owner, PIDTYPE_TGID);
+ if (task)
+ do_send_sig_info(info->notify.sigev_signo,
+ &sig_i, task, PIDTYPE_TGID);
rcu_read_unlock();
-
- kill_pid_info(info->notify.sigev_signo,
- &sig_i, info->notify_owner);
break;
+ }
case SIGEV_THREAD:
set_cookie(info->notify_cookie, NOTIFY_WOKENUP);
netlink_sendskb(info->notify_sock, info->notify_cookie);
The patch titled Subject: ipc/mqueue.c: change __do_notify() to bypass check_kill_permission() has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was ipc-mqueuec-change-__do_notify-to-bypass-check_kill_permission.patch This patch was dropped because an updated version will be merged ------------------------------------------------------ From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Subject: ipc/mqueue.c: change __do_notify() to bypass check_kill_permission() Commit cc731525f26a ("signal: Remove kernel interal si_code magic") changed the value of SI_FROMUSER(SI_MESGQ), this means that mq_notify() no longer works if the sender doesn't have rights to send a signal. Change __do_notify() to use do_send_sig_info() instead of kill_pid_info() to avoid check_kill_permission(). This needs the additional notify.sigev_signo != 0 check, shouldn't we change do_mq_notify() to deny sigev_signo == 0 ? Test-case: #include <signal.h> #include <mqueue.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #include <assert.h> static int notified; static void sigh(int sig) { notified = 1; } int main(void) { signal(SIGIO, sigh); int fd = mq_open("/mq", O_RDWR|O_CREAT, 0666, NULL); assert(fd >= 0); struct sigevent se = { .sigev_notify = SIGEV_SIGNAL, .sigev_signo = SIGIO, }; assert(mq_notify(fd, &se) == 0); if (!fork()) { assert(setuid(1) == 0); mq_send(fd, "",1,0); return 0; } wait(NULL); mq_unlink("/mq"); assert(notified); return 0; } [oleg@redhat.com: s/PIDTYPE_PID/PIDTYPE_TGID/, per Eric] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200327195643.GA9366@redhat.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200324200932.GB24230@redhat.com Fixes: cc731525f26a ("signal: Remove kernel interal si_code magic") Reported-by: Yoji <yoji.fujihar.min@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com> Cc: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> --- ipc/mqueue.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)