@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
/* Copyright(c) 2018-2019 Realtek Corporation
*/
+#include <linux/iopoll.h>
+
#include "main.h"
#include "coex.h"
#include "fw.h"
@@ -193,8 +195,8 @@ static void rtw_fw_send_h2c_command(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev,
u8 box;
u8 box_state;
u32 box_reg, box_ex_reg;
- u32 h2c_wait;
int idx;
+ int ret;
rtw_dbg(rtwdev, RTW_DBG_FW,
"send H2C content %02x%02x%02x%02x %02x%02x%02x%02x\n",
@@ -226,12 +228,11 @@ static void rtw_fw_send_h2c_command(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev,
goto out;
}
- h2c_wait = 20;
- do {
- box_state = rtw_read8(rtwdev, REG_HMETFR);
- } while ((box_state >> box) & 0x1 && --h2c_wait > 0);
+ ret = read_poll_timeout(rtw_read8, box_state,
+ !((box_state >> box) & 0x1), 100, 3000, false,
+ rtwdev, REG_HMETFR);
- if (!h2c_wait) {
+ if (ret) {
rtw_err(rtwdev, "failed to send h2c command\n");
goto out;
}
On some systems we can constanly see rtw88 complains: [39584.721375] rtw_pci 0000:03:00.0: failed to send h2c command Increase interval of each check to wait the status bit really changed. Use read_poll_timeout() macro which fits anything we need here. Suggested-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> --- v2: - Use read_poll_timeout macro. drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c | 13 +++++++------ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)