diff mbox

[V3,4/6] cpufreq: exynos: Use cpufreq_generic_suspend()

Message ID CAKohpoka9VCi+Siygf6wWF4v=9pZawtO-ZZ5EoFDuJpAyv7VBA@mail.gmail.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Viresh Kumar Nov. 26, 2013, 2:36 p.m. UTC 
On 25 November 2013 19:41, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> Currently we have implemented PM notifiers to disable/enable ->target() routines
> functionality during suspend/resume.
>
> Now we have support present in cpufreq core, lets use it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 97 +++-------------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-)

Jonghwan Choi reported an issue with this patch. He asked me
to look at: 6e45eb

And so following diff is updated for this patch in my repo.. Will get
that fixed in V4:


@@ -182,6 +182,9 @@ static int __init exynos_cpufreq_init(void)
                goto err_vdd_arm;
        }

+       /* Done here as we want to capture boot frequency */
+       locking_frequency = clk_get_rate(exynos_info->cpu_clk) / 1000;
+
        if (!cpufreq_register_driver(&exynos_driver))
                return 0;
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
index 4b6e6a6..3f216da 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
@@ -22,8 +22,8 @@ 
 #include "exynos-cpufreq.h"

 static struct exynos_dvfs_info *exynos_info;
-
 static struct regulator *arm_regulator;
+static unsigned int locking_frequency;

 static int exynos_cpufreq_get_index(unsigned int freq)
 {
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@  static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy
*policy, unsigned int index)
 static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 {
        policy->clk = exynos_info->cpu_clk;
-       policy->suspend_freq = clk_get_rate(exynos_info->cpu_clk) / 1000;
+       policy->suspend_freq = locking_frequency;
        return cpufreq_generic_init(policy, exynos_info->freq_table, 100000);
 }