diff mbox series

[net,2/4] net: dsa: sja1105: unconditionally free old gating config

Message ID 20200624135447.3261002-3-olteanv@gmail.com
State New
Headers show
Series [net,1/4] net: dsa: sja1105: move sja1105_compose_gating_subschedule at the top | expand

Commit Message

Vladimir Oltean June 24, 2020, 1:54 p.m. UTC 
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

Currently sja1105_compose_gating_subschedule is not prepared to be
called for the case where we want to recompute the global tc-gate
configuration after we've deleted those actions on a port.

After deleting the tc-gate actions on the last port, max_cycle_time
would become zero, and that would incorrectly prevent
sja1105_free_gating_config from getting called.

So move the freeing function above the check for the need to apply a new
configuration.

Fixes: 834f8933d5dd ("net: dsa: sja1105: implement tc-gate using time-triggered virtual links")
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
---
 drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_vl.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_vl.c b/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_vl.c
index 2b7966714e55..936b14cbb45d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_vl.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_vl.c
@@ -98,6 +98,8 @@  static int sja1105_compose_gating_subschedule(struct sja1105_private *priv,
 	s64 its_base_time = 0;
 	int i, rc = 0;
 
+	sja1105_free_gating_config(gating_cfg);
+
 	list_for_each_entry(rule, &priv->flow_block.rules, list) {
 		if (rule->type != SJA1105_RULE_VL)
 			continue;
@@ -116,8 +118,6 @@  static int sja1105_compose_gating_subschedule(struct sja1105_private *priv,
 	dev_dbg(priv->ds->dev, "max_cycle_time %lld its_base_time %lld\n",
 		max_cycle_time, its_base_time);
 
-	sja1105_free_gating_config(gating_cfg);
-
 	gating_cfg->base_time = its_base_time;
 	gating_cfg->cycle_time = max_cycle_time;
 	gating_cfg->num_entries = 0;