| Message ID | 20200423063811.2636-2-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | None | expand |
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c index 245da96dfddc..8f998b4a7234 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c @@ -228,9 +228,9 @@ static void rtw_fw_send_h2c_command(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, goto out; } - ret = read_poll_timeout(rtw_read8, box_state, - !((box_state >> box) & 0x1), 100, 3000, false, - rtwdev, REG_HMETFR); + ret = read_poll_timeout_atomic(rtw_read8, box_state, + !((box_state >> box) & 0x1), 100, 3000, + false, rtwdev, REG_HMETFR); if (ret) { rtw_err(rtwdev, "failed to send h2c command\n");
It's incorrect to use usleep in atomic context. Switch to a macro which uses udelay instead of usleep to prevent the issue. Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> --- drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)