Message ID | 20200214171907.GA26588@embeddedor |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | Input: gpio_keys_polled - replace zero-length array with flexible-array member | expand |
diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys_polled.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys_polled.c index 6eb0a2f3f9de..c3937d2fc744 100644 --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys_polled.c +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys_polled.c @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ struct gpio_keys_polled_dev { const struct gpio_keys_platform_data *pdata; unsigned long rel_axis_seen[BITS_TO_LONGS(REL_CNT)]; unsigned long abs_axis_seen[BITS_TO_LONGS(ABS_CNT)]; - struct gpio_keys_button_data data[0]; + struct gpio_keys_button_data data[]; }; static void gpio_keys_button_event(struct input_dev *input,
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> --- drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys_polled.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)