@@ -64,15 +64,13 @@ static void rfcomm_sk_data_ready(struct rfcomm_dlc *d, struct sk_buff *skb)
static void rfcomm_sk_state_change(struct rfcomm_dlc *d, int err)
{
struct sock *sk = d->owner, *parent;
- unsigned long flags;
if (!sk)
return;
BT_DBG("dlc %p state %ld err %d", d, d->state, err);
- local_irq_save(flags);
- bh_lock_sock(sk);
+ spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
if (err)
sk->sk_err = err;
@@ -93,8 +91,7 @@ static void rfcomm_sk_state_change(struct rfcomm_dlc *d, int err)
sk->sk_state_change(sk);
}
- bh_unlock_sock(sk);
- local_irq_restore(flags);
+ spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
if (parent && sock_flag(sk, SOCK_ZAPPED)) {
/* We have to drop DLC lock here, otherwise
There was a lockdep which led to commit fad003b6c8e3d ("Bluetooth: Fix inconsistent lock state with RFCOMM") Lockdep noticed that `sk->sk_lock.slock' was acquired without disabling the softirq while the lock was also used in softirq context. Unfortunately the solution back then was to disable interrupts before acquiring the lock which however made lockdep happy. It would have been enough to simply disable the softirq. Disabling interrupts before acquiring a spinlock_t is not allowed on PREEMPT_RT because these locks are converted to 'sleeping' spinlocks. Use spin_lock_bh() in order to acquire the `sk_lock.slock'. Reported-by: Luis Claudio R. Goncalves <lclaudio@uudg.org> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> --- net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c | 7 ++----- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)