| Message ID | 82c927127d191af76f3d609db49dd73c7cc03eda.1368696171.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Headers | show |
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 2:28 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote: > Cpufreq no longer calls governor callback for offlined cpus. i.e. All > policy->cpus are guaranteed to be online. Hence we don't need explicit check to > see if cpu is online or not. Will merge for a future android branch, thanks. > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_interactive.c | 3 --- > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_interactive.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_interactive.c > index 4ed2fed..baa5638 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_interactive.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_interactive.c > @@ -992,9 +992,6 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_interactive(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, > > switch (event) { > case CPUFREQ_GOV_START: > - if (!cpu_online(policy->cpu)) > - return -EINVAL; > - > mutex_lock(&gov_lock); > > freq_table = > -- > 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e >
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_interactive.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_interactive.c index 4ed2fed..baa5638 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_interactive.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_interactive.c @@ -992,9 +992,6 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_interactive(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, switch (event) { case CPUFREQ_GOV_START: - if (!cpu_online(policy->cpu)) - return -EINVAL; - mutex_lock(&gov_lock); freq_table =
Cpufreq no longer calls governor callback for offlined cpus. i.e. All policy->cpus are guaranteed to be online. Hence we don't need explicit check to see if cpu is online or not. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_interactive.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)