Message ID | b9bac95bcc36f5f70e910e4801be5d4f8fd32d0c.1560999838.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [V2,1/5] cpufreq: Remove the redundant !setpolicy check | expand |
On Thursday, June 20, 2019 5:05:46 AM CEST Viresh Kumar wrote: > cpufreq_start_governor() is only called for !setpolicy case, checking it > again is not required. > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > index 85ff958e01f1..54befd775bd6 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > @@ -2153,7 +2153,7 @@ static int cpufreq_start_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > > pr_debug("%s: for CPU %u\n", __func__, policy->cpu); > > - if (cpufreq_driver->get && !cpufreq_driver->setpolicy) > + if (cpufreq_driver->get) > cpufreq_update_current_freq(policy); > > if (policy->governor->start) { > Applied, thanks!
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index 85ff958e01f1..54befd775bd6 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -2153,7 +2153,7 @@ static int cpufreq_start_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) pr_debug("%s: for CPU %u\n", __func__, policy->cpu); - if (cpufreq_driver->get && !cpufreq_driver->setpolicy) + if (cpufreq_driver->get) cpufreq_update_current_freq(policy); if (policy->governor->start) {
cpufreq_start_governor() is only called for !setpolicy case, checking it again is not required. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 2.21.0.rc0.269.g1a574e7a288b