| Message ID | 20190603220819.31701-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v3] i2c: mux/i801: Switch to use descriptor passing | expand |
On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 12:08:19AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > This switches the i801 GPIO mux to use GPIO descriptors for > handling the GPIO lines. The previous hack which was reaching > inside the GPIO chips etc cannot live on. We pass descriptors > along with the GPIO mux device at creation instead. > > The GPIO mux was only used by way of platform data with a > platform device from one place in the kernel: the i801 i2c bus > driver. Let's just associate the GPIO descriptor table with > the actual device like everyone else and dynamically create > a descriptor table passed along with the GPIO i2c mux. > > This enables simplification of the GPIO i2c mux driver to > use only the descriptor API and the OF probe path gets > simplified in the process. > > The i801 driver was registering the GPIO i2c mux with > PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO which would make it hard to predict the > device name and assign the descriptor table properly, but > this seems to be a mistake to begin with: all of the > GPIO mux devices are hardcoded to look up GPIO lines from > the "gpio_ich" GPIO chip. If there are more than one mux, > there is certainly more than one gpio chip as well, and > then we have more serious problems. Switch to > PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE instead. There can be only one. > > Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Can't test this but the code looks good so, Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 12:08:19AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > This switches the i801 GPIO mux to use GPIO descriptors for > handling the GPIO lines. The previous hack which was reaching > inside the GPIO chips etc cannot live on. We pass descriptors > along with the GPIO mux device at creation instead. > > The GPIO mux was only used by way of platform data with a > platform device from one place in the kernel: the i801 i2c bus > driver. Let's just associate the GPIO descriptor table with > the actual device like everyone else and dynamically create > a descriptor table passed along with the GPIO i2c mux. > > This enables simplification of the GPIO i2c mux driver to > use only the descriptor API and the OF probe path gets > simplified in the process. > > The i801 driver was registering the GPIO i2c mux with > PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO which would make it hard to predict the > device name and assign the descriptor table properly, but > this seems to be a mistake to begin with: all of the > GPIO mux devices are hardcoded to look up GPIO lines from > the "gpio_ich" GPIO chip. If there are more than one mux, > there is certainly more than one gpio chip as well, and > then we have more serious problems. Switch to > PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE instead. There can be only one. > +/* FIXME: stop poking around inside gpiolib */ > #include "../../gpio/gpiolib.h" > + /* FIXME: find a proper way to access the GPIO device */ > + gpio_dev = &gpiod->gdev->dev; #include <linux/gpio/driver.h> gpio_dev = &gpiod_to_chip()->...->dev; ? Yes, I noticed "driver" word... :-( But seems cleaner to me, than gpiolib.h inclusion. (Perhaps deserves a separate, preparatory?, patch) -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
On 2019-06-04 00:08, Linus Walleij wrote: > This switches the i801 GPIO mux to use GPIO descriptors for > handling the GPIO lines. The previous hack which was reaching > inside the GPIO chips etc cannot live on. We pass descriptors > along with the GPIO mux device at creation instead. > > The GPIO mux was only used by way of platform data with a > platform device from one place in the kernel: the i801 i2c bus > driver. Let's just associate the GPIO descriptor table with > the actual device like everyone else and dynamically create > a descriptor table passed along with the GPIO i2c mux. > > This enables simplification of the GPIO i2c mux driver to > use only the descriptor API and the OF probe path gets > simplified in the process. > > The i801 driver was registering the GPIO i2c mux with > PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO which would make it hard to predict the > device name and assign the descriptor table properly, but > this seems to be a mistake to begin with: all of the > GPIO mux devices are hardcoded to look up GPIO lines from > the "gpio_ich" GPIO chip. If there are more than one mux, > there is certainly more than one gpio chip as well, and > then we have more serious problems. Switch to > PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE instead. There can be only one. > > Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se> > Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com> > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> > --- > ChangeLog v2->v3: > - Reorder variable declarations to inverse christmas tree. > - Stash away GPIO lookup table reference and make sure to > remove it on deletion and on error path. > - Insert some nasty FIXME comments about poking around > in gpiolib internals. > ChangeLog v1->v2: > - Found some unused vars when compiling for DT, mea culpa. > > Folks, you surely see what I am trying to do. Would > appreciate help fixing any bugs (it compiles). Before I dive in, how does this compare to what Serge Semin is doing https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1091119/ Any chance of some cooperation? The work seem related at first glance. [I'm quoting the whole message for some context for Serge.] Cheers, Peter > --- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c | 37 +++++-- > drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c | 115 ++++++--------------- > include/linux/platform_data/i2c-mux-gpio.h | 7 -- > 3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c > index 679c6c41f64b..4e1ca34e00d8 100644 > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c > @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ > #include <linux/pm_runtime.h> > > #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C_MUX_GPIO) && defined CONFIG_DMI > -#include <linux/gpio.h> > +#include <linux/gpio/machine.h> > #include <linux/platform_data/i2c-mux-gpio.h> > #endif > > @@ -274,6 +274,7 @@ struct i801_priv { > #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C_MUX_GPIO) && defined CONFIG_DMI > const struct i801_mux_config *mux_drvdata; > struct platform_device *mux_pdev; > + struct gpiod_lookup_table *lookup; > #endif > struct platform_device *tco_pdev; > > @@ -1258,7 +1259,8 @@ static int i801_add_mux(struct i801_priv *priv) > struct device *dev = &priv->adapter.dev; > const struct i801_mux_config *mux_config; > struct i2c_mux_gpio_platform_data gpio_data; > - int err; > + struct gpiod_lookup_table *lookup; > + int err, i; > > if (!priv->mux_drvdata) > return 0; > @@ -1270,17 +1272,36 @@ static int i801_add_mux(struct i801_priv *priv) > gpio_data.values = mux_config->values; > gpio_data.n_values = mux_config->n_values; > gpio_data.classes = mux_config->classes; > - gpio_data.gpio_chip = mux_config->gpio_chip; > - gpio_data.gpios = mux_config->gpios; > - gpio_data.n_gpios = mux_config->n_gpios; > gpio_data.idle = I2C_MUX_GPIO_NO_IDLE; > > - /* Register the mux device */ > + /* Register GPIO descriptor lookup table */ > + lookup = devm_kzalloc(dev, > + struct_size(lookup, table, mux_config->n_gpios), > + GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!lookup) > + return -ENOMEM; > + lookup->dev_id = "i2c-mux-gpio"; > + for (i = 0; i < mux_config->n_gpios; i++) { > + lookup->table[i].chip_label = mux_config->gpio_chip; > + lookup->table[i].chip_hwnum = mux_config->gpios[i]; > + lookup->table[i].con_id = NULL; > + } > + gpiod_add_lookup_table(lookup); > + priv->lookup = lookup; > + > + /* > + * Register the mux device, we use PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE here > + * because since we are referring to the GPIO chip by name we are > + * anyways in deep trouble if there is more than one of these > + * devices, and there should likely only be one platform controller > + * hub. > + */ > priv->mux_pdev = platform_device_register_data(dev, "i2c-mux-gpio", > - PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO, &gpio_data, > + PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE, &gpio_data, > sizeof(struct i2c_mux_gpio_platform_data)); > if (IS_ERR(priv->mux_pdev)) { > err = PTR_ERR(priv->mux_pdev); > + gpiod_remove_lookup_table(lookup); > priv->mux_pdev = NULL; > dev_err(dev, "Failed to register i2c-mux-gpio device\n"); > return err; > @@ -1293,6 +1314,8 @@ static void i801_del_mux(struct i801_priv *priv) > { > if (priv->mux_pdev) > platform_device_unregister(priv->mux_pdev); > + if (priv->lookup) > + gpiod_remove_lookup_table(priv->lookup); > } > > static unsigned int i801_get_adapter_class(struct i801_priv *priv) > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c > index 13882a2a4f60..b9578f668fb2 100644 > --- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c > +++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c > @@ -14,13 +14,14 @@ > #include <linux/platform_device.h> > #include <linux/module.h> > #include <linux/slab.h> > -#include <linux/gpio.h> > +#include <linux/bits.h> > +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h> > +/* FIXME: stop poking around inside gpiolib */ > #include "../../gpio/gpiolib.h" > -#include <linux/of_gpio.h> > > struct gpiomux { > struct i2c_mux_gpio_platform_data data; > - unsigned gpio_base; > + int ngpios; > struct gpio_desc **gpios; > }; > > @@ -30,7 +31,7 @@ static void i2c_mux_gpio_set(const struct gpiomux *mux, unsigned val) > > values[0] = val; > > - gpiod_set_array_value_cansleep(mux->data.n_gpios, mux->gpios, NULL, > + gpiod_set_array_value_cansleep(mux->ngpios, mux->gpios, NULL, > values); > } > > @@ -52,12 +53,6 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_deselect(struct i2c_mux_core *muxc, u32 chan) > return 0; > } > > -static int match_gpio_chip_by_label(struct gpio_chip *chip, > - void *data) > -{ > - return !strcmp(chip->label, data); > -} > - > #ifdef CONFIG_OF > static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe_dt(struct gpiomux *mux, > struct platform_device *pdev) > @@ -65,8 +60,8 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe_dt(struct gpiomux *mux, > struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; > struct device_node *adapter_np, *child; > struct i2c_adapter *adapter; > - unsigned *values, *gpios; > - int i = 0, ret; > + unsigned *values; > + int i = 0; > > if (!np) > return -ENODEV; > @@ -103,29 +98,6 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe_dt(struct gpiomux *mux, > if (of_property_read_u32(np, "idle-state", &mux->data.idle)) > mux->data.idle = I2C_MUX_GPIO_NO_IDLE; > > - mux->data.n_gpios = of_gpio_named_count(np, "mux-gpios"); > - if (mux->data.n_gpios < 0) { > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Missing mux-gpios property in the DT.\n"); > - return -EINVAL; > - } > - > - gpios = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, > - mux->data.n_gpios, sizeof(*mux->data.gpios), > - GFP_KERNEL); > - if (!gpios) { > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Cannot allocate gpios array"); > - return -ENOMEM; > - } > - > - for (i = 0; i < mux->data.n_gpios; i++) { > - ret = of_get_named_gpio(np, "mux-gpios", i); > - if (ret < 0) > - return ret; > - gpios[i] = ret; > - } > - > - mux->data.gpios = gpios; > - > return 0; > } > #else > @@ -142,8 +114,8 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > struct gpiomux *mux; > struct i2c_adapter *parent; > struct i2c_adapter *root; > - unsigned initial_state, gpio_base; > - int i, ret; > + unsigned initial_state; > + int i, ngpios, ret; > > mux = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*mux), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!mux) > @@ -158,29 +130,19 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > sizeof(mux->data)); > } > > - /* > - * If a GPIO chip name is provided, the GPIO pin numbers provided are > - * relative to its base GPIO number. Otherwise they are absolute. > - */ > - if (mux->data.gpio_chip) { > - struct gpio_chip *gpio; > - > - gpio = gpiochip_find(mux->data.gpio_chip, > - match_gpio_chip_by_label); > - if (!gpio) > - return -EPROBE_DEFER; > - > - gpio_base = gpio->base; > - } else { > - gpio_base = 0; > + ngpios = gpiod_count(&pdev->dev, NULL); > + if (!ngpios) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no gpios provided\n"); > + return -EINVAL; > } > + mux->ngpios = ngpios; > > parent = i2c_get_adapter(mux->data.parent); > if (!parent) > return -EPROBE_DEFER; > > muxc = i2c_mux_alloc(parent, &pdev->dev, mux->data.n_values, > - mux->data.n_gpios * sizeof(*mux->gpios), 0, > + ngpios * sizeof(*mux->gpios), 0, > i2c_mux_gpio_select, NULL); > if (!muxc) { > ret = -ENOMEM; > @@ -194,7 +156,6 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > root = i2c_root_adapter(&parent->dev); > > muxc->mux_locked = true; > - mux->gpio_base = gpio_base; > > if (mux->data.idle != I2C_MUX_GPIO_NO_IDLE) { > initial_state = mux->data.idle; > @@ -203,34 +164,28 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > initial_state = mux->data.values[0]; > } > > - for (i = 0; i < mux->data.n_gpios; i++) { > + for (i = 0; i < ngpios; i++) { > struct device *gpio_dev; > - struct gpio_desc *gpio_desc; > - > - ret = gpio_request(gpio_base + mux->data.gpios[i], "i2c-mux-gpio"); > - if (ret) { > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request GPIO %d\n", > - mux->data.gpios[i]); > - goto err_request_gpio; > - } > - > - ret = gpio_direction_output(gpio_base + mux->data.gpios[i], > - initial_state & (1 << i)); > - if (ret) { > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, > - "Failed to set direction of GPIO %d to output\n", > - mux->data.gpios[i]); > - i++; /* gpio_request above succeeded, so must free */ > - goto err_request_gpio; > + struct gpio_desc *gpiod; > + enum gpiod_flags flag; > + > + if (initial_state & BIT(i)) > + flag = GPIOD_OUT_HIGH; > + else > + flag = GPIOD_OUT_LOW; > + gpiod = devm_gpiod_get_index(&pdev->dev, NULL, i, flag); > + if (IS_ERR(gpiod)) { > + ret = PTR_ERR(gpiod); > + goto alloc_failed; > } > > - gpio_desc = gpio_to_desc(gpio_base + mux->data.gpios[i]); > - mux->gpios[i] = gpio_desc; > + mux->gpios[i] = gpiod; > > if (!muxc->mux_locked) > continue; > > - gpio_dev = &gpio_desc->gdev->dev; > + /* FIXME: find a proper way to access the GPIO device */ > + gpio_dev = &gpiod->gdev->dev; > muxc->mux_locked = i2c_root_adapter(gpio_dev) == root; > } > > @@ -253,10 +208,6 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > add_adapter_failed: > i2c_mux_del_adapters(muxc); > - i = mux->data.n_gpios; > -err_request_gpio: > - for (; i > 0; i--) > - gpio_free(gpio_base + mux->data.gpios[i - 1]); > alloc_failed: > i2c_put_adapter(parent); > > @@ -266,14 +217,8 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > static int i2c_mux_gpio_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > struct i2c_mux_core *muxc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > - struct gpiomux *mux = i2c_mux_priv(muxc); > - int i; > > i2c_mux_del_adapters(muxc); > - > - for (i = 0; i < mux->data.n_gpios; i++) > - gpio_free(mux->gpio_base + mux->data.gpios[i]); > - > i2c_put_adapter(muxc->parent); > > return 0; > diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/i2c-mux-gpio.h b/include/linux/platform_data/i2c-mux-gpio.h > index 4406108201fe..28f288eed652 100644 > --- a/include/linux/platform_data/i2c-mux-gpio.h > +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/i2c-mux-gpio.h > @@ -22,10 +22,6 @@ > * position > * @n_values: Number of multiplexer positions (busses to instantiate) > * @classes: Optional I2C auto-detection classes > - * @gpio_chip: Optional GPIO chip name; if set, GPIO pin numbers are given > - * relative to the base GPIO number of that chip > - * @gpios: Array of GPIO numbers used to control MUX > - * @n_gpios: Number of GPIOs used to control MUX > * @idle: Bitmask to write to MUX when idle or GPIO_I2CMUX_NO_IDLE if not used > */ > struct i2c_mux_gpio_platform_data { > @@ -34,9 +30,6 @@ struct i2c_mux_gpio_platform_data { > const unsigned *values; > int n_values; > const unsigned *classes; > - char *gpio_chip; > - const unsigned *gpios; > - int n_gpios; > unsigned idle; > }; > >
Hello Peter On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 09:06:22PM +0000, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2019-06-04 00:08, Linus Walleij wrote: > > This switches the i801 GPIO mux to use GPIO descriptors for > > handling the GPIO lines. The previous hack which was reaching > > inside the GPIO chips etc cannot live on. We pass descriptors > > along with the GPIO mux device at creation instead. > > > > The GPIO mux was only used by way of platform data with a > > platform device from one place in the kernel: the i801 i2c bus > > driver. Let's just associate the GPIO descriptor table with > > the actual device like everyone else and dynamically create > > a descriptor table passed along with the GPIO i2c mux. > > > > This enables simplification of the GPIO i2c mux driver to > > use only the descriptor API and the OF probe path gets > > simplified in the process. > > > > The i801 driver was registering the GPIO i2c mux with > > PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO which would make it hard to predict the > > device name and assign the descriptor table properly, but > > this seems to be a mistake to begin with: all of the > > GPIO mux devices are hardcoded to look up GPIO lines from > > the "gpio_ich" GPIO chip. If there are more than one mux, > > there is certainly more than one gpio chip as well, and > > then we have more serious problems. Switch to > > PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE instead. There can be only one. > > > > Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> > > Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> > > Cc: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se> > > Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com> > > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> > > --- > > ChangeLog v2->v3: > > - Reorder variable declarations to inverse christmas tree. > > - Stash away GPIO lookup table reference and make sure to > > remove it on deletion and on error path. > > - Insert some nasty FIXME comments about poking around > > in gpiolib internals. > > ChangeLog v1->v2: > > - Found some unused vars when compiling for DT, mea culpa. > > > > Folks, you surely see what I am trying to do. Would > > appreciate help fixing any bugs (it compiles). > > Before I dive in, how does this compare to what Serge Semin > is doing > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1091119/ > > Any chance of some cooperation? The work seem related at > first glance. > > [I'm quoting the whole message for some context for Serge.] > > Cheers, > Peter > Yes, our works have something in common, but I would appreciate if you reviewed/accepted my patchset first for several reasons: 1. It had been submitted and one more time updated long time ago. Even before the recent merge window had been opened, since then I haven't got any comments and you said you get to it after the merge window is closed. 2. My patchset splits platform_data-based and OF-based code up, which improves the i2c-mux-gpio driver readability. Linus' patch doesn't provide the same way of simplification, but no doubt simplify the code a bit. 3. It doesn't break current platform_data-based driver interface as Linus' does. So if something goes wrong with this patch a user always can get back to my version of the driver. 4. It utilized the modern GPIOd API to fully parse of/dtb/fdt/dts nodes. Linus' alteration also does that, but I have a doubt it is correctly implemented. It seems to me, that Linus' patch hasn't been tested (?) on a OF-based platform, since gpiod_*-methods aren't used correctly ("mux-gpios" con_id utilization is completely removed from the methods invocations, which may cause failures in attempts to find the GPIOs count and get GPIO descriptors). So I suggest to finish my patchset review first. Then rebase this patch on top of it. By doing so we'll get to have a simpler driver code with step-by-step history of alterations from current code state, through platform_data- and OF-based code split up, modern GPIOd API utilization for OF-based path, to the final simplifications Linus' patch provides. This patch shall also get to be simpler for review due to the code split up my patchset provides. I'll help with the review and test it on my platform when the rebase's done. Regards, -Sergey > > --- > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c | 37 +++++-- > > drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c | 115 ++++++--------------- > > include/linux/platform_data/i2c-mux-gpio.h | 7 -- > > 3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c > > index 679c6c41f64b..4e1ca34e00d8 100644 > > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c > > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c > > @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ > > #include <linux/pm_runtime.h> > > > > #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C_MUX_GPIO) && defined CONFIG_DMI > > -#include <linux/gpio.h> > > +#include <linux/gpio/machine.h> > > #include <linux/platform_data/i2c-mux-gpio.h> > > #endif > > > > @@ -274,6 +274,7 @@ struct i801_priv { > > #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C_MUX_GPIO) && defined CONFIG_DMI > > const struct i801_mux_config *mux_drvdata; > > struct platform_device *mux_pdev; > > + struct gpiod_lookup_table *lookup; > > #endif > > struct platform_device *tco_pdev; > > > > @@ -1258,7 +1259,8 @@ static int i801_add_mux(struct i801_priv *priv) > > struct device *dev = &priv->adapter.dev; > > const struct i801_mux_config *mux_config; > > struct i2c_mux_gpio_platform_data gpio_data; > > - int err; > > + struct gpiod_lookup_table *lookup; > > + int err, i; > > > > if (!priv->mux_drvdata) > > return 0; > > @@ -1270,17 +1272,36 @@ static int i801_add_mux(struct i801_priv *priv) > > gpio_data.values = mux_config->values; > > gpio_data.n_values = mux_config->n_values; > > gpio_data.classes = mux_config->classes; > > - gpio_data.gpio_chip = mux_config->gpio_chip; > > - gpio_data.gpios = mux_config->gpios; > > - gpio_data.n_gpios = mux_config->n_gpios; > > gpio_data.idle = I2C_MUX_GPIO_NO_IDLE; > > > > - /* Register the mux device */ > > + /* Register GPIO descriptor lookup table */ > > + lookup = devm_kzalloc(dev, > > + struct_size(lookup, table, mux_config->n_gpios), > > + GFP_KERNEL); > > + if (!lookup) > > + return -ENOMEM; > > + lookup->dev_id = "i2c-mux-gpio"; > > + for (i = 0; i < mux_config->n_gpios; i++) { > > + lookup->table[i].chip_label = mux_config->gpio_chip; > > + lookup->table[i].chip_hwnum = mux_config->gpios[i]; > > + lookup->table[i].con_id = NULL; > > + } > > + gpiod_add_lookup_table(lookup); > > + priv->lookup = lookup; > > + > > + /* > > + * Register the mux device, we use PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE here > > + * because since we are referring to the GPIO chip by name we are > > + * anyways in deep trouble if there is more than one of these > > + * devices, and there should likely only be one platform controller > > + * hub. > > + */ > > priv->mux_pdev = platform_device_register_data(dev, "i2c-mux-gpio", > > - PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO, &gpio_data, > > + PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE, &gpio_data, > > sizeof(struct i2c_mux_gpio_platform_data)); > > if (IS_ERR(priv->mux_pdev)) { > > err = PTR_ERR(priv->mux_pdev); > > + gpiod_remove_lookup_table(lookup); > > priv->mux_pdev = NULL; > > dev_err(dev, "Failed to register i2c-mux-gpio device\n"); > > return err; > > @@ -1293,6 +1314,8 @@ static void i801_del_mux(struct i801_priv *priv) > > { > > if (priv->mux_pdev) > > platform_device_unregister(priv->mux_pdev); > > + if (priv->lookup) > > + gpiod_remove_lookup_table(priv->lookup); > > } > > > > static unsigned int i801_get_adapter_class(struct i801_priv *priv) > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c > > index 13882a2a4f60..b9578f668fb2 100644 > > --- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c > > +++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c > > @@ -14,13 +14,14 @@ > > #include <linux/platform_device.h> > > #include <linux/module.h> > > #include <linux/slab.h> > > -#include <linux/gpio.h> > > +#include <linux/bits.h> > > +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h> > > +/* FIXME: stop poking around inside gpiolib */ > > #include "../../gpio/gpiolib.h" > > -#include <linux/of_gpio.h> > > > > struct gpiomux { > > struct i2c_mux_gpio_platform_data data; > > - unsigned gpio_base; > > + int ngpios; > > struct gpio_desc **gpios; > > }; > > > > @@ -30,7 +31,7 @@ static void i2c_mux_gpio_set(const struct gpiomux *mux, unsigned val) > > > > values[0] = val; > > > > - gpiod_set_array_value_cansleep(mux->data.n_gpios, mux->gpios, NULL, > > + gpiod_set_array_value_cansleep(mux->ngpios, mux->gpios, NULL, > > values); > > } > > > > @@ -52,12 +53,6 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_deselect(struct i2c_mux_core *muxc, u32 chan) > > return 0; > > } > > > > -static int match_gpio_chip_by_label(struct gpio_chip *chip, > > - void *data) > > -{ > > - return !strcmp(chip->label, data); > > -} > > - > > #ifdef CONFIG_OF > > static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe_dt(struct gpiomux *mux, > > struct platform_device *pdev) > > @@ -65,8 +60,8 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe_dt(struct gpiomux *mux, > > struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; > > struct device_node *adapter_np, *child; > > struct i2c_adapter *adapter; > > - unsigned *values, *gpios; > > - int i = 0, ret; > > + unsigned *values; > > + int i = 0; > > > > if (!np) > > return -ENODEV; > > @@ -103,29 +98,6 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe_dt(struct gpiomux *mux, > > if (of_property_read_u32(np, "idle-state", &mux->data.idle)) > > mux->data.idle = I2C_MUX_GPIO_NO_IDLE; > > > > - mux->data.n_gpios = of_gpio_named_count(np, "mux-gpios"); > > - if (mux->data.n_gpios < 0) { > > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Missing mux-gpios property in the DT.\n"); > > - return -EINVAL; > > - } > > - > > - gpios = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, > > - mux->data.n_gpios, sizeof(*mux->data.gpios), > > - GFP_KERNEL); > > - if (!gpios) { > > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Cannot allocate gpios array"); > > - return -ENOMEM; > > - } > > - > > - for (i = 0; i < mux->data.n_gpios; i++) { > > - ret = of_get_named_gpio(np, "mux-gpios", i); > > - if (ret < 0) > > - return ret; > > - gpios[i] = ret; > > - } > > - > > - mux->data.gpios = gpios; > > - > > return 0; > > } > > #else > > @@ -142,8 +114,8 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > struct gpiomux *mux; > > struct i2c_adapter *parent; > > struct i2c_adapter *root; > > - unsigned initial_state, gpio_base; > > - int i, ret; > > + unsigned initial_state; > > + int i, ngpios, ret; > > > > mux = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*mux), GFP_KERNEL); > > if (!mux) > > @@ -158,29 +130,19 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > sizeof(mux->data)); > > } > > > > - /* > > - * If a GPIO chip name is provided, the GPIO pin numbers provided are > > - * relative to its base GPIO number. Otherwise they are absolute. > > - */ > > - if (mux->data.gpio_chip) { > > - struct gpio_chip *gpio; > > - > > - gpio = gpiochip_find(mux->data.gpio_chip, > > - match_gpio_chip_by_label); > > - if (!gpio) > > - return -EPROBE_DEFER; > > - > > - gpio_base = gpio->base; > > - } else { > > - gpio_base = 0; > > + ngpios = gpiod_count(&pdev->dev, NULL); > > + if (!ngpios) { > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no gpios provided\n"); > > + return -EINVAL; > > } > > + mux->ngpios = ngpios; > > > > parent = i2c_get_adapter(mux->data.parent); > > if (!parent) > > return -EPROBE_DEFER; > > > > muxc = i2c_mux_alloc(parent, &pdev->dev, mux->data.n_values, > > - mux->data.n_gpios * sizeof(*mux->gpios), 0, > > + ngpios * sizeof(*mux->gpios), 0, > > i2c_mux_gpio_select, NULL); > > if (!muxc) { > > ret = -ENOMEM; > > @@ -194,7 +156,6 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > root = i2c_root_adapter(&parent->dev); > > > > muxc->mux_locked = true; > > - mux->gpio_base = gpio_base; > > > > if (mux->data.idle != I2C_MUX_GPIO_NO_IDLE) { > > initial_state = mux->data.idle; > > @@ -203,34 +164,28 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > initial_state = mux->data.values[0]; > > } > > > > - for (i = 0; i < mux->data.n_gpios; i++) { > > + for (i = 0; i < ngpios; i++) { > > struct device *gpio_dev; > > - struct gpio_desc *gpio_desc; > > - > > - ret = gpio_request(gpio_base + mux->data.gpios[i], "i2c-mux-gpio"); > > - if (ret) { > > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request GPIO %d\n", > > - mux->data.gpios[i]); > > - goto err_request_gpio; > > - } > > - > > - ret = gpio_direction_output(gpio_base + mux->data.gpios[i], > > - initial_state & (1 << i)); > > - if (ret) { > > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, > > - "Failed to set direction of GPIO %d to output\n", > > - mux->data.gpios[i]); > > - i++; /* gpio_request above succeeded, so must free */ > > - goto err_request_gpio; > > + struct gpio_desc *gpiod; > > + enum gpiod_flags flag; > > + > > + if (initial_state & BIT(i)) > > + flag = GPIOD_OUT_HIGH; > > + else > > + flag = GPIOD_OUT_LOW; > > + gpiod = devm_gpiod_get_index(&pdev->dev, NULL, i, flag); > > + if (IS_ERR(gpiod)) { > > + ret = PTR_ERR(gpiod); > > + goto alloc_failed; > > } > > > > - gpio_desc = gpio_to_desc(gpio_base + mux->data.gpios[i]); > > - mux->gpios[i] = gpio_desc; > > + mux->gpios[i] = gpiod; > > > > if (!muxc->mux_locked) > > continue; > > > > - gpio_dev = &gpio_desc->gdev->dev; > > + /* FIXME: find a proper way to access the GPIO device */ > > + gpio_dev = &gpiod->gdev->dev; > > muxc->mux_locked = i2c_root_adapter(gpio_dev) == root; > > } > > > > @@ -253,10 +208,6 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > > > add_adapter_failed: > > i2c_mux_del_adapters(muxc); > > - i = mux->data.n_gpios; > > -err_request_gpio: > > - for (; i > 0; i--) > > - gpio_free(gpio_base + mux->data.gpios[i - 1]); > > alloc_failed: > > i2c_put_adapter(parent); > > > > @@ -266,14 +217,8 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > static int i2c_mux_gpio_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > > { > > struct i2c_mux_core *muxc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > > - struct gpiomux *mux = i2c_mux_priv(muxc); > > - int i; > > > > i2c_mux_del_adapters(muxc); > > - > > - for (i = 0; i < mux->data.n_gpios; i++) > > - gpio_free(mux->gpio_base + mux->data.gpios[i]); > > - > > i2c_put_adapter(muxc->parent); > > > > return 0; > > diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/i2c-mux-gpio.h b/include/linux/platform_data/i2c-mux-gpio.h > > index 4406108201fe..28f288eed652 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/platform_data/i2c-mux-gpio.h > > +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/i2c-mux-gpio.h > > @@ -22,10 +22,6 @@ > > * position > > * @n_values: Number of multiplexer positions (busses to instantiate) > > * @classes: Optional I2C auto-detection classes > > - * @gpio_chip: Optional GPIO chip name; if set, GPIO pin numbers are given > > - * relative to the base GPIO number of that chip > > - * @gpios: Array of GPIO numbers used to control MUX > > - * @n_gpios: Number of GPIOs used to control MUX > > * @idle: Bitmask to write to MUX when idle or GPIO_I2CMUX_NO_IDLE if not used > > */ > > struct i2c_mux_gpio_platform_data { > > @@ -34,9 +30,6 @@ struct i2c_mux_gpio_platform_data { > > const unsigned *values; > > int n_values; > > const unsigned *classes; > > - char *gpio_chip; > > - const unsigned *gpios; > > - int n_gpios; > > unsigned idle; > > }; > > > > >
On 2019-06-05 00:43, Serge Semin wrote: > Hello Peter > > On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 09:06:22PM +0000, Peter Rosin wrote: >> On 2019-06-04 00:08, Linus Walleij wrote: >>> This switches the i801 GPIO mux to use GPIO descriptors for >>> handling the GPIO lines. The previous hack which was reaching >>> inside the GPIO chips etc cannot live on. We pass descriptors >>> along with the GPIO mux device at creation instead. >>> >>> The GPIO mux was only used by way of platform data with a >>> platform device from one place in the kernel: the i801 i2c bus >>> driver. Let's just associate the GPIO descriptor table with >>> the actual device like everyone else and dynamically create >>> a descriptor table passed along with the GPIO i2c mux. >>> >>> This enables simplification of the GPIO i2c mux driver to >>> use only the descriptor API and the OF probe path gets >>> simplified in the process. >>> >>> The i801 driver was registering the GPIO i2c mux with >>> PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO which would make it hard to predict the >>> device name and assign the descriptor table properly, but >>> this seems to be a mistake to begin with: all of the >>> GPIO mux devices are hardcoded to look up GPIO lines from >>> the "gpio_ich" GPIO chip. If there are more than one mux, >>> there is certainly more than one gpio chip as well, and >>> then we have more serious problems. Switch to >>> PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE instead. There can be only one. >>> >>> Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> >>> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> >>> Cc: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se> >>> Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> >>> --- >>> ChangeLog v2->v3: >>> - Reorder variable declarations to inverse christmas tree. >>> - Stash away GPIO lookup table reference and make sure to >>> remove it on deletion and on error path. >>> - Insert some nasty FIXME comments about poking around >>> in gpiolib internals. >>> ChangeLog v1->v2: >>> - Found some unused vars when compiling for DT, mea culpa. >>> >>> Folks, you surely see what I am trying to do. Would >>> appreciate help fixing any bugs (it compiles). >> >> Before I dive in, how does this compare to what Serge Semin >> is doing >> >> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1091119/ >> >> Any chance of some cooperation? The work seem related at >> first glance. >> >> [I'm quoting the whole message for some context for Serge.] >> >> Cheers, >> Peter >> > > Yes, our works have something in common, but I would appreciate if you > reviewed/accepted my patchset first for several reasons: I asked for cooperation. Calling out "me first" is just not it. > 1. It had been submitted and one more time updated long time ago. Even before the > recent merge window had been opened, since then I haven't got any comments > and you said you get to it after the merge window is closed. Your series was too late for the 5.2 merge window (it was sent a week or two before it opened, and I had no time to rush it). End result, I now have two "competing" pieces of work for the 5.3 merge window. Which of these works was sent first has little bearing on my ordering issues. I you guys don't sort this out, I will go whichever way I find more pleasing. > 2. My patchset splits platform_data-based and OF-based code up, which improves the > i2c-mux-gpio driver readability. Linus' patch doesn't provide the same way of > simplification, but no doubt simplify the code a bit. So, I had a closer look, and yes, your patches do split up the of and plat code. But is this the right approach? The only user of the plat interface is the i2c-i801 driver (and I would really like for the plat interface to just go away). Linus' approach seem (to at least attempt) to consolidate the plat and of code paths so that the i2c-mux-gpio code can ignore the platform interface and only work with the gpiod interface. I like that. > 3. It doesn't break current platform_data-based driver interface as Linus' does. > So if something goes wrong with this patch a user always can get back to my > version of the driver. Linus touches both users of that interface (ignoring any and all out-of-tree losers). But sure, there might be some mistake lurking. He did ask for help though! > 4. It utilized the modern GPIOd API to fully parse of/dtb/fdt/dts nodes. > Linus' alteration also does that, but I have a doubt it is correctly implemented. > > It seems to me, that Linus' patch hasn't been tested (?) on a OF-based platform, > since gpiod_*-methods aren't used correctly ("mux-gpios" con_id utilization > is completely removed from the methods invocations, which may cause failures > in attempts to find the GPIOs count and get GPIO descriptors). Yes, it seems that gpiod_count() and devm_gpiod_get_index() calls can't unconditionally pass NULL as the 2nd argument. Linus? > So I suggest to finish my patchset review first. Then rebase this patch on top of > it. By doing so we'll get to have a simpler driver code with step-by-step history > of alterations from current code state, through platform_data- and OF-based code > split up, modern GPIOd API utilization for OF-based path, to the final > simplifications Linus' patch provides. This patch shall also get to be simpler for > review due to the code split up my patchset provides. I'll help with the review and > test it on my platform when the rebase's done. I'm not so sure. If Linus' patch works out, there will simply be no need to separate the plat/of code paths. Which is of course neat and tidy. Cheers, Peter > Regards, > -Sergey
On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 08:15:35AM +0000, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2019-06-05 00:43, Serge Semin wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 09:06:22PM +0000, Peter Rosin wrote: > >> On 2019-06-04 00:08, Linus Walleij wrote: > > 2. My patchset splits platform_data-based and OF-based code up, which improves the > > i2c-mux-gpio driver readability. Linus' patch doesn't provide the same way of > > simplification, but no doubt simplify the code a bit. > > So, I had a closer look, and yes, your patches do split up the of and > plat code. But is this the right approach? The only user of the plat > interface is the i2c-i801 driver (and I would really like for the > plat interface to just go away). Linus' approach seem (to at least > attempt) to consolidate the plat and of code paths so that the > i2c-mux-gpio code can ignore the platform interface and only > work with the gpiod interface. I like that. I second the idea of drop legacy platform data support. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 10:15 AM Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se> wrote: > On 2019-06-05 00:43, Serge Semin wrote: > I > now have two "competing" pieces of work for the 5.3 merge window. I had no idea about Serge's patch set, sorry for my ignorance and overload etc. Serge, if I just rebase & fix this as soon as your stuff is upstream, can you test my patches? > Which > of these works was sent first has little bearing on my ordering issues. > I you guys don't sort this out, I will go whichever way I find more > pleasing. I'm fine if you apply Serge's patch set first, I can just look over the result afterwards and see what remains to fix. My only goal is really to get rid of all <linux/gpio.h> from the kernel in favor of using the consumer and machine APIs. Yours, Linus Walleij
Hello Linus, On Sat, Jun 08, 2019 at 12:55:27AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 10:15 AM Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se> wrote: > > On 2019-06-05 00:43, Serge Semin wrote: > > > I > > now have two "competing" pieces of work for the 5.3 merge window. > > I had no idea about Serge's patch set, sorry for my ignorance and > overload etc. > > Serge, if I just rebase & fix this as soon as your stuff is upstream, can > you test my patches? > Thanks for response. As I said, as soon as your patch gets to be rebased on top of my patchset (though we need to wait Peter to finish the review of it) I'll gladly test it on my machine. Regards, -Segey > > Which > > of these works was sent first has little bearing on my ordering issues. > > I you guys don't sort this out, I will go whichever way I find more > > pleasing. > > I'm fine if you apply Serge's patch set first, I can just look over the > result afterwards and see what remains to fix. My only goal is > really to get rid of all <linux/gpio.h> from the kernel in favor of > using the consumer and machine APIs. > > Yours, > Linus Walleij
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c index 679c6c41f64b..4e1ca34e00d8 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ #include <linux/pm_runtime.h> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C_MUX_GPIO) && defined CONFIG_DMI -#include <linux/gpio.h> +#include <linux/gpio/machine.h> #include <linux/platform_data/i2c-mux-gpio.h> #endif @@ -274,6 +274,7 @@ struct i801_priv { #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_I2C_MUX_GPIO) && defined CONFIG_DMI const struct i801_mux_config *mux_drvdata; struct platform_device *mux_pdev; + struct gpiod_lookup_table *lookup; #endif struct platform_device *tco_pdev; @@ -1258,7 +1259,8 @@ static int i801_add_mux(struct i801_priv *priv) struct device *dev = &priv->adapter.dev; const struct i801_mux_config *mux_config; struct i2c_mux_gpio_platform_data gpio_data; - int err; + struct gpiod_lookup_table *lookup; + int err, i; if (!priv->mux_drvdata) return 0; @@ -1270,17 +1272,36 @@ static int i801_add_mux(struct i801_priv *priv) gpio_data.values = mux_config->values; gpio_data.n_values = mux_config->n_values; gpio_data.classes = mux_config->classes; - gpio_data.gpio_chip = mux_config->gpio_chip; - gpio_data.gpios = mux_config->gpios; - gpio_data.n_gpios = mux_config->n_gpios; gpio_data.idle = I2C_MUX_GPIO_NO_IDLE; - /* Register the mux device */ + /* Register GPIO descriptor lookup table */ + lookup = devm_kzalloc(dev, + struct_size(lookup, table, mux_config->n_gpios), + GFP_KERNEL); + if (!lookup) + return -ENOMEM; + lookup->dev_id = "i2c-mux-gpio"; + for (i = 0; i < mux_config->n_gpios; i++) { + lookup->table[i].chip_label = mux_config->gpio_chip; + lookup->table[i].chip_hwnum = mux_config->gpios[i]; + lookup->table[i].con_id = NULL; + } + gpiod_add_lookup_table(lookup); + priv->lookup = lookup; + + /* + * Register the mux device, we use PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE here + * because since we are referring to the GPIO chip by name we are + * anyways in deep trouble if there is more than one of these + * devices, and there should likely only be one platform controller + * hub. + */ priv->mux_pdev = platform_device_register_data(dev, "i2c-mux-gpio", - PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO, &gpio_data, + PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE, &gpio_data, sizeof(struct i2c_mux_gpio_platform_data)); if (IS_ERR(priv->mux_pdev)) { err = PTR_ERR(priv->mux_pdev); + gpiod_remove_lookup_table(lookup); priv->mux_pdev = NULL; dev_err(dev, "Failed to register i2c-mux-gpio device\n"); return err; @@ -1293,6 +1314,8 @@ static void i801_del_mux(struct i801_priv *priv) { if (priv->mux_pdev) platform_device_unregister(priv->mux_pdev); + if (priv->lookup) + gpiod_remove_lookup_table(priv->lookup); } static unsigned int i801_get_adapter_class(struct i801_priv *priv) diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c index 13882a2a4f60..b9578f668fb2 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c @@ -14,13 +14,14 @@ #include <linux/platform_device.h> #include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/slab.h> -#include <linux/gpio.h> +#include <linux/bits.h> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h> +/* FIXME: stop poking around inside gpiolib */ #include "../../gpio/gpiolib.h" -#include <linux/of_gpio.h> struct gpiomux { struct i2c_mux_gpio_platform_data data; - unsigned gpio_base; + int ngpios; struct gpio_desc **gpios; }; @@ -30,7 +31,7 @@ static void i2c_mux_gpio_set(const struct gpiomux *mux, unsigned val) values[0] = val; - gpiod_set_array_value_cansleep(mux->data.n_gpios, mux->gpios, NULL, + gpiod_set_array_value_cansleep(mux->ngpios, mux->gpios, NULL, values); } @@ -52,12 +53,6 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_deselect(struct i2c_mux_core *muxc, u32 chan) return 0; } -static int match_gpio_chip_by_label(struct gpio_chip *chip, - void *data) -{ - return !strcmp(chip->label, data); -} - #ifdef CONFIG_OF static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe_dt(struct gpiomux *mux, struct platform_device *pdev) @@ -65,8 +60,8 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe_dt(struct gpiomux *mux, struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; struct device_node *adapter_np, *child; struct i2c_adapter *adapter; - unsigned *values, *gpios; - int i = 0, ret; + unsigned *values; + int i = 0; if (!np) return -ENODEV; @@ -103,29 +98,6 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe_dt(struct gpiomux *mux, if (of_property_read_u32(np, "idle-state", &mux->data.idle)) mux->data.idle = I2C_MUX_GPIO_NO_IDLE; - mux->data.n_gpios = of_gpio_named_count(np, "mux-gpios"); - if (mux->data.n_gpios < 0) { - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Missing mux-gpios property in the DT.\n"); - return -EINVAL; - } - - gpios = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, - mux->data.n_gpios, sizeof(*mux->data.gpios), - GFP_KERNEL); - if (!gpios) { - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Cannot allocate gpios array"); - return -ENOMEM; - } - - for (i = 0; i < mux->data.n_gpios; i++) { - ret = of_get_named_gpio(np, "mux-gpios", i); - if (ret < 0) - return ret; - gpios[i] = ret; - } - - mux->data.gpios = gpios; - return 0; } #else @@ -142,8 +114,8 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) struct gpiomux *mux; struct i2c_adapter *parent; struct i2c_adapter *root; - unsigned initial_state, gpio_base; - int i, ret; + unsigned initial_state; + int i, ngpios, ret; mux = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*mux), GFP_KERNEL); if (!mux) @@ -158,29 +130,19 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) sizeof(mux->data)); } - /* - * If a GPIO chip name is provided, the GPIO pin numbers provided are - * relative to its base GPIO number. Otherwise they are absolute. - */ - if (mux->data.gpio_chip) { - struct gpio_chip *gpio; - - gpio = gpiochip_find(mux->data.gpio_chip, - match_gpio_chip_by_label); - if (!gpio) - return -EPROBE_DEFER; - - gpio_base = gpio->base; - } else { - gpio_base = 0; + ngpios = gpiod_count(&pdev->dev, NULL); + if (!ngpios) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no gpios provided\n"); + return -EINVAL; } + mux->ngpios = ngpios; parent = i2c_get_adapter(mux->data.parent); if (!parent) return -EPROBE_DEFER; muxc = i2c_mux_alloc(parent, &pdev->dev, mux->data.n_values, - mux->data.n_gpios * sizeof(*mux->gpios), 0, + ngpios * sizeof(*mux->gpios), 0, i2c_mux_gpio_select, NULL); if (!muxc) { ret = -ENOMEM; @@ -194,7 +156,6 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) root = i2c_root_adapter(&parent->dev); muxc->mux_locked = true; - mux->gpio_base = gpio_base; if (mux->data.idle != I2C_MUX_GPIO_NO_IDLE) { initial_state = mux->data.idle; @@ -203,34 +164,28 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) initial_state = mux->data.values[0]; } - for (i = 0; i < mux->data.n_gpios; i++) { + for (i = 0; i < ngpios; i++) { struct device *gpio_dev; - struct gpio_desc *gpio_desc; - - ret = gpio_request(gpio_base + mux->data.gpios[i], "i2c-mux-gpio"); - if (ret) { - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request GPIO %d\n", - mux->data.gpios[i]); - goto err_request_gpio; - } - - ret = gpio_direction_output(gpio_base + mux->data.gpios[i], - initial_state & (1 << i)); - if (ret) { - dev_err(&pdev->dev, - "Failed to set direction of GPIO %d to output\n", - mux->data.gpios[i]); - i++; /* gpio_request above succeeded, so must free */ - goto err_request_gpio; + struct gpio_desc *gpiod; + enum gpiod_flags flag; + + if (initial_state & BIT(i)) + flag = GPIOD_OUT_HIGH; + else + flag = GPIOD_OUT_LOW; + gpiod = devm_gpiod_get_index(&pdev->dev, NULL, i, flag); + if (IS_ERR(gpiod)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(gpiod); + goto alloc_failed; } - gpio_desc = gpio_to_desc(gpio_base + mux->data.gpios[i]); - mux->gpios[i] = gpio_desc; + mux->gpios[i] = gpiod; if (!muxc->mux_locked) continue; - gpio_dev = &gpio_desc->gdev->dev; + /* FIXME: find a proper way to access the GPIO device */ + gpio_dev = &gpiod->gdev->dev; muxc->mux_locked = i2c_root_adapter(gpio_dev) == root; } @@ -253,10 +208,6 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) add_adapter_failed: i2c_mux_del_adapters(muxc); - i = mux->data.n_gpios; -err_request_gpio: - for (; i > 0; i--) - gpio_free(gpio_base + mux->data.gpios[i - 1]); alloc_failed: i2c_put_adapter(parent); @@ -266,14 +217,8 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) static int i2c_mux_gpio_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct i2c_mux_core *muxc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); - struct gpiomux *mux = i2c_mux_priv(muxc); - int i; i2c_mux_del_adapters(muxc); - - for (i = 0; i < mux->data.n_gpios; i++) - gpio_free(mux->gpio_base + mux->data.gpios[i]); - i2c_put_adapter(muxc->parent); return 0; diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/i2c-mux-gpio.h b/include/linux/platform_data/i2c-mux-gpio.h index 4406108201fe..28f288eed652 100644 --- a/include/linux/platform_data/i2c-mux-gpio.h +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/i2c-mux-gpio.h @@ -22,10 +22,6 @@ * position * @n_values: Number of multiplexer positions (busses to instantiate) * @classes: Optional I2C auto-detection classes - * @gpio_chip: Optional GPIO chip name; if set, GPIO pin numbers are given - * relative to the base GPIO number of that chip - * @gpios: Array of GPIO numbers used to control MUX - * @n_gpios: Number of GPIOs used to control MUX * @idle: Bitmask to write to MUX when idle or GPIO_I2CMUX_NO_IDLE if not used */ struct i2c_mux_gpio_platform_data { @@ -34,9 +30,6 @@ struct i2c_mux_gpio_platform_data { const unsigned *values; int n_values; const unsigned *classes; - char *gpio_chip; - const unsigned *gpios; - int n_gpios; unsigned idle; };
This switches the i801 GPIO mux to use GPIO descriptors for handling the GPIO lines. The previous hack which was reaching inside the GPIO chips etc cannot live on. We pass descriptors along with the GPIO mux device at creation instead. The GPIO mux was only used by way of platform data with a platform device from one place in the kernel: the i801 i2c bus driver. Let's just associate the GPIO descriptor table with the actual device like everyone else and dynamically create a descriptor table passed along with the GPIO i2c mux. This enables simplification of the GPIO i2c mux driver to use only the descriptor API and the OF probe path gets simplified in the process. The i801 driver was registering the GPIO i2c mux with PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO which would make it hard to predict the device name and assign the descriptor table properly, but this seems to be a mistake to begin with: all of the GPIO mux devices are hardcoded to look up GPIO lines from the "gpio_ich" GPIO chip. If there are more than one mux, there is certainly more than one gpio chip as well, and then we have more serious problems. Switch to PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE instead. There can be only one. Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Cc: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se> Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> --- ChangeLog v2->v3: - Reorder variable declarations to inverse christmas tree. - Stash away GPIO lookup table reference and make sure to remove it on deletion and on error path. - Insert some nasty FIXME comments about poking around in gpiolib internals. ChangeLog v1->v2: - Found some unused vars when compiling for DT, mea culpa. Folks, you surely see what I am trying to do. Would appreciate help fixing any bugs (it compiles). --- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c | 37 +++++-- drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c | 115 ++++++--------------- include/linux/platform_data/i2c-mux-gpio.h | 7 -- 3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-) -- 2.20.1