diff mbox

ARM: KVM: Don't handle PSCI calls via SMC

Message ID 1367426968-5577-1-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Dave Martin May 1, 2013, 4:49 p.m. UTC 
Currently, kvmtool unconditionally declares that HVC should be used
to call PSCI, so the function numbers in the DT tell the guest
nothing about the function ID namespace or calling convention for
SMC.

We already assume that the guest will examine and honour the DT,
since there is no way it could possibly guess the KVM-specific PSCI
function IDs otherwise.  So let's not encourage guests to violate
what's specified in the DT by using SMC to make the call.

Signed-off-by: Dave P Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm/kvm/arm.c  |    3 ---
 arch/arm/kvm/psci.c |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Christoffer Dall May 1, 2013, 5:59 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Dave P Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> wrote:
> Currently, kvmtool unconditionally declares that HVC should be used
> to call PSCI, so the function numbers in the DT tell the guest
> nothing about the function ID namespace or calling convention for
> SMC.
>
> We already assume that the guest will examine and honour the DT,
> since there is no way it could possibly guess the KVM-specific PSCI
> function IDs otherwise.  So let's not encourage guests to violate
> what's specified in the DT by using SMC to make the call.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave P Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

Thanks, applied.

-Christoffer
Dave Martin May 2, 2013, 5:19 p.m. UTC | #2 
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 10:59:13AM -0700, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Dave P Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> wrote:
> > Currently, kvmtool unconditionally declares that HVC should be used
> > to call PSCI, so the function numbers in the DT tell the guest
> > nothing about the function ID namespace or calling convention for
> > SMC.
> >
> > We already assume that the guest will examine and honour the DT,
> > since there is no way it could possibly guess the KVM-specific PSCI
> > function IDs otherwise.  So let's not encourage guests to violate
> > what's specified in the DT by using SMC to make the call.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dave P Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
> > Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> 
> Thanks, applied.
> 
> -Christoffer

Thanks
---Dave
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
index 5a93698..32a3495 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
@@ -503,9 +503,6 @@  static int handle_hvc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
 
 static int handle_smc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
 {
-	if (kvm_psci_call(vcpu))
-		return 1;
-
 	kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu);
 	return 1;
 }
diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/psci.c b/arch/arm/kvm/psci.c
index 7ee5bb7..86a693a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kvm/psci.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kvm/psci.c
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@  static unsigned long kvm_psci_vcpu_on(struct kvm_vcpu *source_vcpu)
  * kvm_psci_call - handle PSCI call if r0 value is in range
  * @vcpu: Pointer to the VCPU struct
  *
- * Handle PSCI calls from guests through traps from HVC or SMC instructions.
+ * Handle PSCI calls from guests through traps from HVC instructions.
  * The calling convention is similar to SMC calls to the secure world where
  * the function number is placed in r0 and this function returns true if the
  * function number specified in r0 is withing the PSCI range, and false