@@ -444,8 +444,12 @@ struct spi_controller {
/* bitmask of supported bits_per_word for transfers */
u32 bits_per_word_mask;
#define SPI_BPW_MASK(bits) BIT((bits) - 1)
-#define SPI_BIT_MASK(bits) (((bits) == 32) ? ~0U : (BIT(bits) - 1))
-#define SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK(min, max) (SPI_BIT_MASK(max) - SPI_BIT_MASK(min - 1))
+/*
+ * double shift to avoid shifting beyond BITS_PER_LONG, see also
+ * https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38789
+ */
+#define SPI_BIT_MASK(bits) ((BIT((bits) - 1) << 1) - 1)
+#define SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK(min, max) (SPI_BIT_MASK(max) - (BIT((min) - 1) - 1))
/* limits on transfer speed */
u32 min_speed_hz;
Clang-8 evaluates both sides of a ?: expression to check for valid arithmetic even in the side that is never taken. This results in a build warning: drivers/spi/spi-sh-msiof.c:1052:24: error: shift count >= width of type [-Werror,-Wshift-count-overflow] .bits_per_word_mask = SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK(8, 32), ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Change it to shift one less than we want, and then shift one more bit afterwards. This should give the correct result for all valid input, since it has to be in the range 1..32 anyway. Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38789 Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> --- v2: add a code comment --- include/linux/spi/spi.h | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) -- 2.20.0