Message ID | 20190204132904.9288-1-anders.roxell@linaro.org |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | firmware: efi: arm-runtime: fix build error void value not ignored | expand |
On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 at 14:29, Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org> wrote: > > Commit e2a2e56e4082 ("arm64: dump: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions") > changed the return value from 'int' to 'void'. > > ../drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c: In function ‘ptdump_init’: > ../drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c:52:9: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be > return ptdump_debugfs_register(&efi_ptdump_info, "efi_page_tables"); > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > ../drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c:53:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type] > } > ^ > > Rework so that function 'ptdump_init' doesn't 'return > ptdump_debug_fs_register(...' since the function can work or not, but > the code logic should never do something different based on this. > > Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org> Hi Anders, Thanks for the fix. Someone else spotted the same bug, and sent a similar fix, and I asked Will or Catalin to take it through the arm64 for-next tree since this is where the offending patch lives. So for either this patch or for the other one Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c > index 352bd2473162..b9ae798192d6 100644 > --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c > +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c > @@ -49,7 +49,8 @@ static int __init ptdump_init(void) > if (!efi_enabled(EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES)) > return 0; > > - return ptdump_debugfs_register(&efi_ptdump_info, "efi_page_tables"); > + ptdump_debugfs_register(&efi_ptdump_info, "efi_page_tables"); > + return 0; > } > device_initcall(ptdump_init); > > -- > 2.20.1 >
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c index 352bd2473162..b9ae798192d6 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c @@ -49,7 +49,8 @@ static int __init ptdump_init(void) if (!efi_enabled(EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES)) return 0; - return ptdump_debugfs_register(&efi_ptdump_info, "efi_page_tables"); + ptdump_debugfs_register(&efi_ptdump_info, "efi_page_tables"); + return 0; } device_initcall(ptdump_init);
Commit e2a2e56e4082 ("arm64: dump: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions") changed the return value from 'int' to 'void'. ../drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c: In function ‘ptdump_init’: ../drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c:52:9: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be return ptdump_debugfs_register(&efi_ptdump_info, "efi_page_tables"); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ../drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c:53:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type] } ^ Rework so that function 'ptdump_init' doesn't 'return ptdump_debug_fs_register(...' since the function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org> --- drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 2.20.1