Message ID | 1542712496-24941-1-git-send-email-loic.poulain@linaro.org |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | clk: qcom: msm8916: Additional clock rates for spi | expand |
Quoting Loic Poulain (2018-11-20 03:14:56) > Add SPI friendly clock rates to the spi freq table. > Today it's not possible to use SPI at lower than 960Khz. > This patch adds 100/250/500/1000 khz configs to the table. s/khz/kHz/ > > Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8916.c | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8916.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8916.c > index ac2b0aa..7d9647c 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8916.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8916.c > @@ -544,7 +544,11 @@ static struct clk_rcg2 blsp1_qup1_i2c_apps_clk_src = { > }; > > static const struct freq_tbl ftbl_gcc_blsp1_qup1_6_spi_apps_clk[] = { > + F(100000, P_XO, 16, 2, 24), > + F(250000, P_XO, 16, 5, 24), > + F(500000, P_XO, 8, 5, 24), > F(960000, P_XO, 10, 1, 2), > + F(1000000, P_XO, 4, 5, 24), Does Qualcomm have information on these rates? Have they been tested? And did you measure these frequencies? The math checks out, but I wonder if the hardware can actually do it.
Quoting Loic Poulain (2018-11-21 09:36:05) > Hi Stephen, > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 at 17:39, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> wrote: > > Quoting Loic Poulain (2018-11-20 03:14:56) > > Add SPI friendly clock rates to the spi freq table. > > Today it's not possible to use SPI at lower than 960Khz. > > This patch adds 100/250/500/1000 khz configs to the table. > > s/khz/kHz/ > > > > > Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org> > > --- > > drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8916.c | 4 ++++ > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8916.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/ > gcc-msm8916.c > > index ac2b0aa..7d9647c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8916.c > > +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8916.c > > @@ -544,7 +544,11 @@ static struct clk_rcg2 blsp1_qup1_i2c_apps_clk_src = > { > > }; > > > > static const struct freq_tbl ftbl_gcc_blsp1_qup1_6_spi_apps_clk[] = { > > + F(100000, P_XO, 16, 2, 24), > > + F(250000, P_XO, 16, 5, 24), > > + F(500000, P_XO, 8, 5, 24), > > F(960000, P_XO, 10, 1, 2), > > + F(1000000, P_XO, 4, 5, 24), > > Does Qualcomm have information on these rates? Have they been tested? > And did you measure these frequencies? The math checks out, but I wonder > if the hardware can actually do it. > > > No info from QCOM, I just tested this on a Dragonboard-410C/APQ8016 and > measured SPI clk with a Logic Analyzer. > Frequencies match expected values. > Ok. Taniya, can you help here and add a Reviewed-by?
diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8916.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8916.c index ac2b0aa..7d9647c 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8916.c +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8916.c @@ -544,7 +544,11 @@ static struct clk_rcg2 blsp1_qup1_i2c_apps_clk_src = { }; static const struct freq_tbl ftbl_gcc_blsp1_qup1_6_spi_apps_clk[] = { + F(100000, P_XO, 16, 2, 24), + F(250000, P_XO, 16, 5, 24), + F(500000, P_XO, 8, 5, 24), F(960000, P_XO, 10, 1, 2), + F(1000000, P_XO, 4, 5, 24), F(4800000, P_XO, 4, 0, 0), F(9600000, P_XO, 2, 0, 0), F(16000000, P_GPLL0, 10, 1, 5),
Add SPI friendly clock rates to the spi freq table. Today it's not possible to use SPI at lower than 960Khz. This patch adds 100/250/500/1000 khz configs to the table. Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org> --- drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8916.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) -- 2.7.4