| Message ID | 20181002171447.10765-1-natechancellor@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [RESEND] drbd: avoid clang warning about pointless switch statement | expand |
On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 10:14:48AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > > The drbd code causes warnings that we cannot easily disable when building with clang: > > In file included from drivers/block/drbd/drbd_debugfs.c:10: > In file included from drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h:48: > In file included from include/linux/drbd_genl_api.h:53: > In file included from include/linux/genl_magic_struct.h:237: > include/linux/drbd_genl.h:300:1: warning: no case matching constant switch condition '0' > > There is nothing wrong with the code, and adding 'default:' labels > in the right place is enough to let clang shut up about the warning. Actually, I think I'd prefer a "case 0:" instead of the "default:", because that would assert that we don't use a 0 for op or field numbers. As at least some people seem to care, I suggest we bundle up this and the other clang warning you just resent the patch for with whatever else we may come up with for the next merge window and send a pull request to Jens then. In case we forget, please send a friendly reminder. Thanks, Lars
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 09:18:54PM +0200, Lars Ellenberg wrote: > On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 10:14:48AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > > > > The drbd code causes warnings that we cannot easily disable when building with clang: > > > > In file included from drivers/block/drbd/drbd_debugfs.c:10: > > In file included from drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h:48: > > In file included from include/linux/drbd_genl_api.h:53: > > In file included from include/linux/genl_magic_struct.h:237: > > include/linux/drbd_genl.h:300:1: warning: no case matching constant switch condition '0' > > > > There is nothing wrong with the code, and adding 'default:' labels > > in the right place is enough to let clang shut up about the warning. > > Actually, I think I'd prefer a "case 0:" instead of the "default:", > because that would assert that we don't use a 0 for op or field numbers. > > As at least some people seem to care, I suggest we bundle up > this and the other clang warning you just resent the patch for > with whatever else we may come up with for the next merge window > and send a pull request to Jens then. > In case we forget, please send a friendly reminder. > > Thanks, > > Lars > Hi Lars, I will go ahead and test that change shortly and send it over for review. Thanks for the quick reply! Nathan
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 01:09:13PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > There are several warnings from Clang about no case statement matching > the constant 0: > > In file included from drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c:48: > In file included from drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h:48: > In file included from ./include/linux/drbd_genl_api.h:54: > In file included from ./include/linux/genl_magic_struct.h:236: > ./include/linux/drbd_genl.h:321:1: warning: no case matching constant > switch condition '0' > GENL_struct(DRBD_NLA_HELPER, 24, drbd_helper_info, > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > ./include/linux/genl_magic_struct.h:220:10: note: expanded from macro > 'GENL_struct' > switch (0) { > ^ > > Silence this warning by adding a 'case 0:' statement. Additionally, > adjust the alignment of the statements in the ct_assert_unique macro to > avoid a checkpatch warning. > > This solution was originally sent by Arnd Bergmann with a default case > statement: https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/756723/ > > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/43 > Suggested-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> > Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> > --- > > Since this is not the same as Arnd's patch, I took authorship for it > while leaving a link to the original patch in the commit message. If > this is not how it should have been done, please let me know. > > include/linux/genl_magic_struct.h | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/genl_magic_struct.h b/include/linux/genl_magic_struct.h > index 5972e4969197..eeae59d3ceb7 100644 > --- a/include/linux/genl_magic_struct.h > +++ b/include/linux/genl_magic_struct.h > @@ -191,6 +191,7 @@ static inline void ct_assert_unique_operations(void) > { > switch (0) { > #include GENL_MAGIC_INCLUDE_FILE > + case 0: > ; > } > } > @@ -209,6 +210,7 @@ static inline void ct_assert_unique_top_level_attributes(void) > { > switch (0) { > #include GENL_MAGIC_INCLUDE_FILE > + case 0: > ; > } > } > @@ -218,7 +220,8 @@ static inline void ct_assert_unique_top_level_attributes(void) > static inline void ct_assert_unique_ ## s_name ## _attributes(void) \ > { \ > switch (0) { \ > - s_fields \ > + s_fields \ > + case 0: \ > ; \ > } \ > } > -- > 2.19.0 > Hi Lars and Philipp, Could you please make sure that this patch and the other one I sent make it into 4.21/5.0? I am not sure when you were planning on sending the pull request to Jens that you mentioned in the other thread but I've noticed most maintainers typically send their requests for the impending merge window around -rc7 or so and I wanted to make sure it was on your radar. Thank you, Nathan
On 12/17/18 10:24 AM, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 01:09:13PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: >> There are several warnings from Clang about no case statement matching >> the constant 0: >> >> In file included from drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c:48: >> In file included from drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h:48: >> In file included from ./include/linux/drbd_genl_api.h:54: >> In file included from ./include/linux/genl_magic_struct.h:236: >> ./include/linux/drbd_genl.h:321:1: warning: no case matching constant >> switch condition '0' >> GENL_struct(DRBD_NLA_HELPER, 24, drbd_helper_info, >> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> ./include/linux/genl_magic_struct.h:220:10: note: expanded from macro >> 'GENL_struct' >> switch (0) { >> ^ >> >> Silence this warning by adding a 'case 0:' statement. Additionally, >> adjust the alignment of the statements in the ct_assert_unique macro to >> avoid a checkpatch warning. >> >> This solution was originally sent by Arnd Bergmann with a default case >> statement: https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/756723/ >> >> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/43 >> Suggested-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> >> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> >> --- >> >> Since this is not the same as Arnd's patch, I took authorship for it >> while leaving a link to the original patch in the commit message. If >> this is not how it should have been done, please let me know. >> >> include/linux/genl_magic_struct.h | 5 ++++- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/genl_magic_struct.h b/include/linux/genl_magic_struct.h >> index 5972e4969197..eeae59d3ceb7 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/genl_magic_struct.h >> +++ b/include/linux/genl_magic_struct.h >> @@ -191,6 +191,7 @@ static inline void ct_assert_unique_operations(void) >> { >> switch (0) { >> #include GENL_MAGIC_INCLUDE_FILE >> + case 0: >> ; >> } >> } >> @@ -209,6 +210,7 @@ static inline void ct_assert_unique_top_level_attributes(void) >> { >> switch (0) { >> #include GENL_MAGIC_INCLUDE_FILE >> + case 0: >> ; >> } >> } >> @@ -218,7 +220,8 @@ static inline void ct_assert_unique_top_level_attributes(void) >> static inline void ct_assert_unique_ ## s_name ## _attributes(void) \ >> { \ >> switch (0) { \ >> - s_fields \ >> + s_fields \ >> + case 0: \ >> ; \ >> } \ >> } >> -- >> 2.19.0 >> > > Hi Lars and Philipp, > > Could you please make sure that this patch and the other one I sent make > it into 4.21/5.0? I am not sure when you were planning on sending the > pull request to Jens that you mentioned in the other thread but I've > noticed most maintainers typically send their requests for the impending > merge window around -rc7 or so and I wanted to make sure it was on your > radar. It needs to get here now, but drbd hasn't really sent anything in for about a year, so I'm starting to doubt how maintained it is at this point. -- Jens Axboe
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 10:29:38AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: > > Hi Lars and Philipp, > > > > Could you please make sure that this patch and the other one I sent make > > it into 4.21/5.0? I am not sure when you were planning on sending the > > pull request to Jens that you mentioned in the other thread but I've > > noticed most maintainers typically send their requests for the impending > > merge window around -rc7 or so and I wanted to make sure it was on your > > radar. I'm sorry. From my point of view, "fixing the pointless switch" is just "pointless", so it (again) fell through. I get it that it is important to others, and getting rid of Clang warnings is a good thing. So sorry again. > It needs to get here now, but drbd hasn't really sent anything in for > about a year, Last actual fix was 2018-06-25 64dafbc9530c drbd: fix access after free so almost six month, yes. > so I'm starting to doubt how maintained it is at this > point. Oh, it is maintained. It is just happens to be "stable". We don't add new features there, and I'm currently not aware of any misbehavior. I'll prepare a pull request containing this, the other Clang warning patch from Nathan, and possibly other small stuff that accumulated, if I can find any, and send that out later today. Thanks for the reminder, Lars
On 12/18/18 2:22 AM, Lars Ellenberg wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 10:29:38AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: >>> Hi Lars and Philipp, >>> >>> Could you please make sure that this patch and the other one I sent make >>> it into 4.21/5.0? I am not sure when you were planning on sending the >>> pull request to Jens that you mentioned in the other thread but I've >>> noticed most maintainers typically send their requests for the impending >>> merge window around -rc7 or so and I wanted to make sure it was on your >>> radar. > > I'm sorry. > From my point of view, "fixing the pointless switch" is just "pointless", > so it (again) fell through. I get it that it is important to others, > and getting rid of Clang warnings is a good thing. So sorry again. > >> It needs to get here now, but drbd hasn't really sent anything in for >> about a year, > > Last actual fix was 2018-06-25 64dafbc9530c drbd: fix access after free > so almost six month, yes. It just dropped from its usual cadence of regular updates. >> so I'm starting to doubt how maintained it is at this >> point. > > Oh, it is maintained. It is just happens to be "stable". > We don't add new features there, > and I'm currently not aware of any misbehavior. Well, I guess that's good news then :-) > I'll prepare a pull request containing this, > the other Clang warning patch from Nathan, > and possibly other small stuff that accumulated, > if I can find any, and send that out later today. > > Thanks for the reminder, Thank. -- Jens Axboe
diff --git a/include/linux/genl_magic_struct.h b/include/linux/genl_magic_struct.h index 5972e4969197..c11f42179c63 100644 --- a/include/linux/genl_magic_struct.h +++ b/include/linux/genl_magic_struct.h @@ -191,6 +191,7 @@ static inline void ct_assert_unique_operations(void) { switch (0) { #include GENL_MAGIC_INCLUDE_FILE + default: ; } } @@ -209,6 +210,7 @@ static inline void ct_assert_unique_top_level_attributes(void) { switch (0) { #include GENL_MAGIC_INCLUDE_FILE + default: ; } } @@ -219,6 +221,7 @@ static inline void ct_assert_unique_ ## s_name ## _attributes(void) \ { \ switch (0) { \ s_fields \ + default: \ ; \ } \ }