Message ID | 1521051359-34473-9-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | dfda4492322ed0a1eb9c4d4715c4b90c9af57352 |
Headers | show |
Series | LPC: legacy ISA I/O support | expand |
On Wednesday, March 14, 2018 7:15:57 PM CET John Garry wrote: > Through the logical PIO framework systems which otherwise have > no IO space access to legacy ISA/LPC devices may access these > devices through so-called "indirect IO" method. In this, IO > space accesses for non-PCI hosts are redirected to a host > LLDD to manually generate the IO space (bus) accesses. Hosts > are able to register a region in logical PIO space to map to > its bus address range. > > Indirect IO child devices have an associated host-specific bus > address. Special translation is required to map between > a logical PIO address for a device and it's host bus address. > > Since in the ACPI tables the child device IO resources would > be the host-specific values, it is required the ACPI scan code > should not enumerate these devices, and that this should be > the responsibility of the host driver so that it can "fixup" > the resources so that they map to the appropriate logical PIO > addresses. > > To avoid enumerating these child devices, we add a check from > acpi_device_enumeration_by_parent() as to whether the parent > for a device is a member of a known list of "indirect IO" hosts. > For now, the HiSilicon LPC host controller ID is added. > > Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com> > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> You have my ACK here already. Since I've ACKed the [7/10] too, I don't think there's anything more I can do about this series and I'm assuming that it will be routed through other trees. Thanks! > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> > Tested-by: dann frazier <dann.frazier@canonical.com> > --- > drivers/acpi/scan.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c > index f9e7904..a4cbf3e 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c > @@ -1524,11 +1524,25 @@ static int acpi_check_serial_bus_slave(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data) > return -1; > } > > +static bool acpi_is_indirect_io_slave(struct acpi_device *device) > +{ > + struct acpi_device *parent = device->parent; > + const struct acpi_device_id indirect_io_hosts[] = { > + {"HISI0191", 0}, > + {} > + }; > + > + return parent && !acpi_match_device_ids(parent, indirect_io_hosts); > +} > + > static bool acpi_device_enumeration_by_parent(struct acpi_device *device) > { > struct list_head resource_list; > bool is_serial_bus_slave = false; > > + if (acpi_is_indirect_io_slave(device)) > + return true; > + > /* Macs use device properties in lieu of _CRS resources */ > if (x86_apple_machine && > (fwnode_property_present(&device->fwnode, "spiSclkPeriod") || >
On 19/03/2018 10:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, March 14, 2018 7:15:57 PM CET John Garry wrote: >> > Through the logical PIO framework systems which otherwise have >> > no IO space access to legacy ISA/LPC devices may access these >> > devices through so-called "indirect IO" method. In this, IO >> > space accesses for non-PCI hosts are redirected to a host >> > LLDD to manually generate the IO space (bus) accesses. Hosts >> > are able to register a region in logical PIO space to map to >> > its bus address range. >> > >> > Indirect IO child devices have an associated host-specific bus >> > address. Special translation is required to map between >> > a logical PIO address for a device and it's host bus address. >> > >> > Since in the ACPI tables the child device IO resources would >> > be the host-specific values, it is required the ACPI scan code >> > should not enumerate these devices, and that this should be >> > the responsibility of the host driver so that it can "fixup" >> > the resources so that they map to the appropriate logical PIO >> > addresses. >> > >> > To avoid enumerating these child devices, we add a check from >> > acpi_device_enumeration_by_parent() as to whether the parent >> > for a device is a member of a known list of "indirect IO" hosts. >> > For now, the HiSilicon LPC host controller ID is added. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com> >> > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > You have my ACK here already. > > Since I've ACKed the [7/10] too, I don't think there's anything more I can do > about this series and I'm assuming that it will be routed through other trees. > > Thanks! > Hi Rafael, Thanks for this. Yes, I am working on getting this whole series routed through another tree. Actually I think 7+8 could go separately since there is no build dependency, but I will try to keep the series together. All the best, And thanks again, John
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 11:48 AM, John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com> wrote: > On 19/03/2018 10:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> >> On Wednesday, March 14, 2018 7:15:57 PM CET John Garry wrote: >>> >>> > Through the logical PIO framework systems which otherwise have >>> > no IO space access to legacy ISA/LPC devices may access these >>> > devices through so-called "indirect IO" method. In this, IO >>> > space accesses for non-PCI hosts are redirected to a host >>> > LLDD to manually generate the IO space (bus) accesses. Hosts >>> > are able to register a region in logical PIO space to map to >>> > its bus address range. >>> > >>> > Indirect IO child devices have an associated host-specific bus >>> > address. Special translation is required to map between >>> > a logical PIO address for a device and it's host bus address. >>> > >>> > Since in the ACPI tables the child device IO resources would >>> > be the host-specific values, it is required the ACPI scan code >>> > should not enumerate these devices, and that this should be >>> > the responsibility of the host driver so that it can "fixup" >>> > the resources so that they map to the appropriate logical PIO >>> > addresses. >>> > >>> > To avoid enumerating these child devices, we add a check from >>> > acpi_device_enumeration_by_parent() as to whether the parent >>> > for a device is a member of a known list of "indirect IO" hosts. >>> > For now, the HiSilicon LPC host controller ID is added. >>> > >>> > Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com> >>> > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> >> >> You have my ACK here already. >> >> Since I've ACKed the [7/10] too, I don't think there's anything more I can >> do >> about this series and I'm assuming that it will be routed through other >> trees. >> >> Thanks! >> > > Hi Rafael, > > Thanks for this. > > Yes, I am working on getting this whole series routed through another tree. > Actually I think 7+8 could go separately since there is no build dependency, > but I will try to keep the series together. I can take the [7-8/10] if you want me to, so please let me know. Thanks!
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c index f9e7904..a4cbf3e 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c @@ -1524,11 +1524,25 @@ static int acpi_check_serial_bus_slave(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data) return -1; } +static bool acpi_is_indirect_io_slave(struct acpi_device *device) +{ + struct acpi_device *parent = device->parent; + const struct acpi_device_id indirect_io_hosts[] = { + {"HISI0191", 0}, + {} + }; + + return parent && !acpi_match_device_ids(parent, indirect_io_hosts); +} + static bool acpi_device_enumeration_by_parent(struct acpi_device *device) { struct list_head resource_list; bool is_serial_bus_slave = false; + if (acpi_is_indirect_io_slave(device)) + return true; + /* Macs use device properties in lieu of _CRS resources */ if (x86_apple_machine && (fwnode_property_present(&device->fwnode, "spiSclkPeriod") ||